Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia

[JGalt]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Those were sham "investigations." Obama's DOJ refused to turn over documents to Congress, and exonerated Hillary even before the investigation was over.

Hillary's troubles haven't even started yet. The Senate is opening hearings on her shenanigans which after they go to the DOJ, will most likely open a criminal investigation.

 

[sealybobo]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

Yea but it's the House of Reps you got to worry about.

 

[sealybobo]

Something we knew all along.

We already knew what the Senate thinks

 

[JGalt]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Sounds a lot like Trump

No, that was a reference to you people. You define insanity: Doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result.

How's that "socialism" thingy working out or you? Think you'll make it work this time?

 

[Lesh]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

The also don't have supeona power and have to get witness to volunteer to testify.

They "have " it but CHOSE not to use it

 

[sealybobo]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Sounds a lot like Trump

No, that was a reference to you people. You define insanity: Doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result.

How's that "socialism" thingy working out or you? Think you'll make it work this time?

It was working. In fact the new deal, unions, pensions, labor laws, social security, medicare were all working fine until Republicans sabotaged all of these things in the name of increasing profits and giving tax breaks to the rich.

We created a middle class the world had never seen before. And now you are asking Trump to MAGA? How? Is he going to shrink the gap between the rich and poor? So far he has only widened it.

Trump’s First 500 Days Only Widen Gap Between Richest Americans & Everyone Else - Democrats

 

[Lesh]

To start with we know that the e-mails released by wikileaks were stolen by Russian Intel (GRU...Military Intel)

We now know that there was collusion between wikileaks and the Trump campaign that goes as far as Steve Bannon and "someone" above him in the campaign .That leaves only a few people

We know that Trump was in negotiations with the Russian government to get the biggest deal of his life done (Trump Moscow Tower...300 million) all the way through the 2016 election campaign

We know that Putin (as stated in the Helsinki Conference) admits that he favored Trump

We know that virtually everyone in the Trump campaign had meetings with high ranking Russians and lied about them to the public and Federal investigators

We know that the RNC Convention platform was changed from being pro-Ukraine to being Pro-Russia

We know that there was a meeting in the Trump Tower in which opposition research on Clinton was offered

We know that Trump crafted a statement lying about that meeting

We know that Trump has not initiated sanctions against Russia that were enacted into law by Congress after the Skripal poisoning

We know that Trump never said a word about the Russian mercenary attack on our forces in Syria

We know that Trump just eased sanctions on the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska

We know that Trump has made a number of very puzzling statements that sound like Russian propaganda (Montenegrans being warlike people...the Soviet incursion in Afghanistan being caused by terrorism)

What we don't know (or can't yet prove)

Where those bizarre statements came from (virtually no one in Trump's cabinet would have fed him that)

Why those actions regarding sanctions occurred

Why the Platform was changed at the RNC Convention and by whom

Which upper campaign official (above Bannon) was colluding with Stone and wikileaks

DId Stone or the campaign officials know that the wikileaks stuff came from Russians

DId Assange and Wikileaks know that

Were leaked e-mails discussed at the Trump Tower meeting?

 

[Dragonlady]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

The also don't have supeona power and have to get witness to volunteer to testify.

They "have " it but CHOSE not to use it

It's kinda hard to find much of anything unless you actually look for it. Dontcha think.

 

[hazlnut]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

"But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.

"If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," said Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, in an interview with CBS News last week.

Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered, but he also made clear that the investigation was nearing an end."


What is the opposite of conclusive?

No, I mean a word stronger that inconclusive...

 

[JGalt]

"Donald Trump Jr. made clear in his messages that he was willing to accept help from the Russians," one Democratic Senate investigator said. "Trump publicly urged the Russians to find Clinton's missing emails."
​

That from the NBC News article. I see this tossed about all the time trying to link Trump and Russia, but does no one else remember WHY Trump made this request in the first place? Am I the only person with a memory longer than 12 minutes ago...?

You do know he was being sarcastic, right?

"Hey Russia: If you're listening, would you please send us back Hillary's missing emails. The news media would love you for it."

How about this: "Hey Russia: If you're listening, how about we trade you all our liberals for some decent vodka and caviar? You can put them to work growing beets on your farms, and we won't be bothered by them anymore."

Now what are you gonna do? Go tell Mueller? Start an "investigation"?

 

[JGalt]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

Yea but it's the House of Reps you got to worry about.

The House can only initiate impeachment proceedings. It's the Senate who conducts the removal trial.

Once again, you're just pissing into the wind, so just admit it: You lost. Trump is still President, he will continue to be President, and he isn't going anywhere.

 

[JGalt]

Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia


YET !

Nor will they ever. You're finished.

 

[hazlnut]

GOP Senator: We found exactly what we were looking for...nothing.

DEM Senator: We found substantial evidence to prove being in the minority limits your ability to investigate things.

American People: How much did that cost us?

Donald Trump: How much you wanna bet I can have sex with Mitch's wife?

 

[Dragonlady]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Those were sham "investigations." Obama's DOJ refused to turn over documents to Congress, and exonerated Hillary even before the investigation was over.

Hillary's troubles haven't even started yet. The Senate is opening hearings on her shenanigans which after they go to the DOJ, will most likely open a criminal investigation.

Watch those hearings get shut down in a big fast hurry, because there is no "there", there.

If Republicans gin up yet another boondoggle of an fake investigation into the supposed cimes of Hillary Clinton, all of which have been investigated at least a half dozen times with not a single charge ever having been filed, or even recommended by any Court, Grand Jury, Special Investigator, Senate, Committeem House Committee, IG, IRS, CIA, or FBI. 17 investigations in all, they're just going to make themselves look ridiculous as an every longer parade of Trump Staffers, is carted of in handcuffs to plead guilty and go to jail.

None of these entities have ever produced a shred of evidence that Hillary Clinton ever committed a crime, or a single witness who testified against her.

I have come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton has to be the smartest criminal in the world, if even Trey Gowdy didn't recommend that she be charged with a crime. Because I'm pretty sure Gowdy would have sold his soul to the devil to put Hillary Clinton behind bars, and even he could find nothing against her. He considers his campaign a success because he kept her from the White House.

Either that or she has operated at all times within the law, met all legal requirements for conducting her Foundations, and her personal businesses, and made all legal filings required. She has not deceived or lied to the public in regards to her business matters or her finances.

Since everything the woman has done in the past 25 years has been investigated 6 times over, the Clintons would have to be fools to do ANYTHING illegal.

As we've seen with Trump, somebody always says something stupid, somebody always brags, somebody gets in trouble, and people start turning state's evidence. And the whole conspiracy unravels. If the Clintons really were the criminals Republicans continue to claim they are, they'd be some evidence of it somewhere after all this time.

 

[JGalt]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Sounds a lot like Trump

No, that was a reference to you people. You define insanity: Doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result.

How's that "socialism" thingy working out or you? Think you'll make it work this time?

It was working. In fact the new deal, unions, pensions, labor laws, social security, medicare were all working fine until Republicans sabotaged all of these things in the name of increasing profits and giving tax breaks to the rich.

We created a middle class the world had never seen before. And now you are asking Trump to MAGA? How? Is he going to shrink the gap between the rich and poor? So far he has only widened it.

Trump’s First 500 Days Only Widen Gap Between Richest Americans & Everyone Else - Democrats

"Sabotaged"? Well I'm honored that you think we are that powerful. But seriously, you people screwed your own pooch, we didn't do that to you.

Keep up the good work.

 

[JGalt]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Those were sham "investigations." Obama's DOJ refused to turn over documents to Congress, and exonerated Hillary even before the investigation was over.

Hillary's troubles haven't even started yet. The Senate is opening hearings on her shenanigans which after they go to the DOJ, will most likely open a criminal investigation.

Watch those hearings get shut down in a big fast hurry, because there is no "there", there.

If Republicans gin up yet another boondoggle of an fake investigation into the supposed cimes of Hillary Clinton, all of which have been investigatered at least a half dozen times with not a single charge ever having been filed, or even recommended by any Court, Grand Jury, Special Investigator, Senate, Committeem House Committee, IG, IRS, CIA, or FBI. 17 investigations in all.

None of these entities have ever produced a shred of evidence that Hillary Clinton ever committed a crime, or a single witness who testified against her.

I have come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton has to be the smartest criminal in the world, if even Trey Gowdy didn't recommend that she be charged with a crime. Because I'm pretty sure Gowdy would have sold his soul to the devil to put Hillary Clinton behind bars, and even he could find nothing against her. He considers his campaign a success because he kept her from the White House.

You do know that most of the Obama-sympathizers have been weeded out of the Justice Department by now, don't you? Do you even know how many upper-echelon FBI and DOJ personnel have either been fired or quit, over the last two years?

As soon as this new AG is confirmed, you're going to see some serious shit hitting the fan. Be ready for it.

 

[Dragonlady]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Those were sham "investigations." Obama's DOJ refused to turn over documents to Congress, and exonerated Hillary even before the investigation was over.

Hillary's troubles haven't even started yet. The Senate is opening hearings on her shenanigans which after they go to the DOJ, will most likely open a criminal investigation.

Watch those hearings get shut down in a big fast hurry, because there is no "there", there.

If Republicans gin up yet another boondoggle of an fake investigation into the supposed cimes of Hillary Clinton, all of which have been investigatered at least a half dozen times with not a single charge ever having been filed, or even recommended by any Court, Grand Jury, Special Investigator, Senate, Committeem House Committee, IG, IRS, CIA, or FBI. 17 investigations in all.

None of these entities have ever produced a shred of evidence that Hillary Clinton ever committed a crime, or a single witness who testified against her.

I have come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton has to be the smartest criminal in the world, if even Trey Gowdy didn't recommend that she be charged with a crime. Because I'm pretty sure Gowdy would have sold his soul to the devil to put Hillary Clinton behind bars, and even he could find nothing against her. He considers his campaign a success because he kept her from the White House.

You do know that most of the Obama-sympathizers have been weeded out of the Justice Department by now, don't you? Do you even know how many upper-echelon FBI and DOJ personnel have either been fired or quit, over the last two years?

As soon as this new AG is confirmed, you're going to see some serious shit hitting the fan. Be ready for it.

You do know that Clinton was investigated by Republicans don't you? By Republicans who had SWORN they were going to bring the ***** down? By Ken Starr who said his job was to "Get the Clintons". By Trey Gowdy who was appoplectic that Comey didn't recommend charges, but who himself did not recommend she be charged.

There have been numerous judicial reviews of all matters Hillary since Trump fired all of the Obama Justice Department workers and NOT ONE OF THEM has recommend charges be filed against Hillary. All have confirmed the results of the prior investigations.

 

[JGalt]

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Those were sham "investigations." Obama's DOJ refused to turn over documents to Congress, and exonerated Hillary even before the investigation was over.

Hillary's troubles haven't even started yet. The Senate is opening hearings on her shenanigans which after they go to the DOJ, will most likely open a criminal investigation.

Watch those hearings get shut down in a big fast hurry, because there is no "there", there.

If Republicans gin up yet another boondoggle of an fake investigation into the supposed cimes of Hillary Clinton, all of which have been investigatered at least a half dozen times with not a single charge ever having been filed, or even recommended by any Court, Grand Jury, Special Investigator, Senate, Committeem House Committee, IG, IRS, CIA, or FBI. 17 investigations in all.

None of these entities have ever produced a shred of evidence that Hillary Clinton ever committed a crime, or a single witness who testified against her.

I have come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton has to be the smartest criminal in the world, if even Trey Gowdy didn't recommend that she be charged with a crime. Because I'm pretty sure Gowdy would have sold his soul to the devil to put Hillary Clinton behind bars, and even he could find nothing against her. He considers his campaign a success because he kept her from the White House.

You do know that most of the Obama-sympathizers have been weeded out of the Justice Department by now, don't you? Do you even know how many upper-echelon FBI and DOJ personnel have either been fired or quit, over the last two years?

As soon as this new AG is confirmed, you're going to see some serious shit hitting the fan. Be ready for it.

You do know that Clinton was investigated by Republicans don't you? By Republicans who had SWORN they were going to bring the ***** down? By Ken Starr who said his job was to "Get the Clintons". By Trey Gowdy who was appoplectic that Comey didn't recommend charges, but who himself did not recommend she be charged.

There have been numerous judicial reviews of all matters Hillary since Trump fired all of the Obama Justice Department workers and NOT ONE OF THEM has recommend charges be filed against Hillary. All have confirmed the results of the prior investigations.

It doesn't matter that Clinton was investigated by Republicans. They were hamstrung by an uncooperative Department of Justice who refused to turn over documents. Then we got stuck with that weasel of an AG, Jeff Sessions.

Look for things to change soon, as soon as Barr is the AG.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

When has a Senate Committee ever found evidence of wrong doing by a president from the majority party of the Senate?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Now don't cry little ABNORMAL...It will get worse for yoU... ROTFLMFAO!

It was a simple question, so it triggered you so.

No, it was a stupid partisan question driven by emotion. You can't find any evidence against Trump so you demand someone else present evidence about something else.

I have said my whole time on this forum that did not think Trump did anything wrong, that still has not changed.

But if you were not such a mindless partisan sheep you would know there is not an example of a Senate Committee that ever found evidence of wrong doing by a president from the majority party of the Senate.

These committee reports are worth less than the paper they are printed on.

But you mindless sheep act like they were handed down by Moses himself.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It doesn't matter that Clinton was investigated by Republicans. They were hamstrung by an uncooperative Department of Justice who refused to turn over documents. Then we got stuck with that weasel of an AG, Jeff Sessions.

Who picked Jeff Sessions?

Look for things to change soon, as soon as Barr is the AG.

Barr is more of an establishment Repub than Sessions was. Nothing will change under Barr, he was born and raised in the swamp.