Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia

[easyt65]

There was never any evidence of any crime that required an investigation from the start, especially one that required a Special Prosecutor to be appointed.

2+ years, millions of tax dollars, and all criminal evidence regarding illegal collusion with the Russians points to the Democrats.

 

[Siete]

Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia


YET !

 

[The Original Tree]

Now if Trump had given Iran Billions for Obama Bombs built by Putin, funded Terrorists, plotted coups and assassinations of world leaders by paying Al Queda, and sold Russia Our Uranium, I'd ask for him to be tried for Treason.

Oh wait, that was Obama.

Never mind, that's racist.

 

[OldLady]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

The legislature is supposed to have oversight over the executive. We have an independent investigation going on, the Senate just concluded a total sham, and the House will finally do its duty after abandoning it for Trump’s first 2 years.

Well, they can read the Mueller report first.

 

[bendog]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

The legislature is supposed to have oversight over the executive. We have an independent investigation going on, the Senate just concluded a total sham, and the House will finally do its duty after abandoning it for Trump’s first 2 years.

Well, they can read the Mueller report first.

It wouldn't affect them.

 

[The Original Tree]

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

The legislature is supposed to have oversight over the executive. We have an independent investigation going on, the Senate just concluded a total sham, and the House will finally do its duty after abandoning it for Trump’s first 2 years.

Well, they can read the Mueller report first.

It wouldn't affect them.

Mueller will ask to have his own report buried.

 

[easyt65]

The legislature is supposed to have oversight over the executive. We have an independent investigation going on, the Senate just concluded a total sham, and the House will finally do its duty after abandoning it for Trump’s first 2 years.

Evidence shows that 'Independent Investigator / Special Counsel' was working with the DOJ's Ohr and FBI EMPLOYEE Trump-Hating Foreign Spy Steele BEFORE an investigation was opened up, BEFORE he was appointed Special Counsel, and that he KNEW the Dossier was false, written by Russians because Ohr testified before Congress and stated he briefed the DOT, NSA, CIA ,and FBI that the dossier was NOT reliable and that Steele hated Trump. That means there was already collaboration between the DOJ, NSA, CIA, FBI, and Mueller back in 2016 before the election.

The entire conspiracy has been exposed with evidence, documents, and testimony. Democrats and Mueller will be extremely lucky if after filing their report they are able to slip away into obscurity instead of being rounded up and sent to jail.

 

[easyt65]

Mueller will ask to have his own report buried.

'A Matter Of national Security'

 

[The Original Tree]

The legislature is supposed to have oversight over the executive. We have an independent investigation going on, the Senate just concluded a total sham, and the House will finally do its duty after abandoning it for Trump’s first 2 years.

Evidence shows that 'Independent Investigator / Special Counsel' was working with the DOJ's Ohr and FBI EMPLOYEE Trump-Hating Foreign Spy Steele BEFORE an investigation was opened up, BEFORE he was appointed Special Counsel, and that he KNEW the Dossier was false, written by Russians because Ohr testified before Congress and stated he briefed the DOT, NSA, CIA ,and FBI that the dossier was NOT reliable and that Steele hated Trump. That means there was already collaboration between the DOJ, NSA, CIA, FBI, and Mueller back in 2016 before the election.

The entire conspiracy has been exposed with evidence, documents, and testimony. Democrats and Mueller will be extremely lucky if after filing their report they are able to slip away into obscurity instead of being rounded up and sent to jail.

The sick part is that NONE OF THIS WAS EXPOSED BY ANY OF THESE FAKE INVESTIGATIONS.

NOPE.

It was all exposed through FOIA requests and JUDICIAL WATCH.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

When has a Senate Committee ever found evidence of wrong doing by a president from the majority party of the Senate?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[The Purge]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

When has a Senate Committee ever found evidence of wrong doing by a president from the majority party of the Senate?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Now don't cry little ABNORMAL...It will get worse for yoU... ROTFLMFAO!

 

[easyt65]

The sick part is that NONE OF THIS WAS EXPOSED BY ANY OF THESE FAKE INVESTIGATIONS. NOPE. It was all exposed through FOIA requests and JUDICIAL WATCH.

After Mueller vowed to investigate ANY crime that was exposed during his investigation...and these Democrat crimes went 'Un-Noticed', uncovered by a simple FOIA Request by American Citizens, AND he refused to investigate any of them, that must make Mueller one of the WORST Special Prosecutors / Investigators in history, a complete failure.

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

The REPUBLICAN Senate has found no collusion between members of the Trump campaign and Russia, despite coverage of that fact being all over the news for some time!

Gee, there's a surprise...

It was a bi-partisan committee. The vice chair is a (D)...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

When has a Senate Committee ever found evidence of wrong doing by a president from the majority party of the Senate?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Now don't cry little ABNORMAL...It will get worse for yoU... ROTFLMFAO!

It was a simple question, so it triggered you so.



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[easyt65]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

When has a Senate Committee ever found evidence of wrong doing by a president from the majority party of the Senate?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Now don't cry little ABNORMAL...It will get worse for yoU... ROTFLMFAO!

It was a simple question, so it triggered you so.

No, it was a stupid partisan question driven by emotion. You can't find any evidence against Trump so you demand someone else present evidence about something else.

 

[debbiedowner]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

Circumstantial evidence is not enough to convict.

Sure you can look it up, but it's up to the jury to weigh the evidence.

 

[debbiedowner]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

When did we start convicting people on "circumstantial evidence", dolt? I just heard that Mueller might not even release his findings.

Please turn out the lights and lock the door when you leave. The party's over.

Does Scott Peterson ring a bell?

 

[Dragonlady]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

The also don't have supeona power and have to get witness to volunteer to testify.

 

[debbiedowner]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Sounds a lot like Trump

 

[Dirk the Daring]

"Donald Trump Jr. made clear in his messages that he was willing to accept help from the Russians," one Democratic Senate investigator said. "Trump publicly urged the Russians to find Clinton's missing emails."
​

That from the NBC News article. I see this tossed about all the time trying to link Trump and Russia, but does no one else remember WHY Trump made this request in the first place? Am I the only person with a memory longer than 12 minutes ago...?