This is not a left or right issue, you idiot. If you were not mentally impaired, as well as ignorant it would not be necessary to spoon feed facts to you. You have access to the same information as anyone else, you just choose to claim it doesn't exist.
What facts? Some things you read can be proven, a fact. Stats on women benefitting from AA, no proof. How do you prove a woman got the job because she was female?
This is not a left or right issue, you idiot. If you were not mentally impaired, as well as ignorant it would not be necessary to spoon feed facts to you. You have access to the same information as anyone else, you just choose to claim it doesn't exist.
What facts? Some things you read can be proven, a fact. Stats on women benefitting from AA, no proof. How do you prove a woman got the job because she was female?
The majority of the gains by white females during AA were recognized in the first 3 decades of the initiative. There is much more evidence like this out there. This is only one example.
Interestingly, in spite of what the one who started this thread insists about white people being "victimized" by AA, white males as a demographic represent approximately 35% of the population, however they hold nearly 75% of managerial positions in the workforce.
That is not a case of "victimization".
Prior to AA gaining traction, white females in most cases held secretarial jobs, teaching jobs or positions in the service industry.
If you are 60+ years or older, you would have seen this yourself.
"A 1995
report by the California Senate Government Organization Committee found that white women held a majority of managerial jobs (57,250) compared with African Americans (10,500), Latinos (19,000), and Asian Americans (24,600) after the first two decades of affirmative action in the private sector. In
2015, a disproportionate representation of white women business owners set off concerns that New York state would not be able to bridge a racial gap among public contractors".