Second Amendment advocates would this change your mind?

[Blues Man]

In an opinion piece found in the news and observer, this nut believes his words could bring us to a compromise.
As for me I might pay him a visit and show him how wrong he is.

https://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/article259852460.html

A considerable number of proponents of gun control seem to know very little about the firearms they seek to regulate and so often sound ignorant when discussing gun control.

Magazine size is irrelevant.

It takes literally less than 2 seconds to swap a magazine.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

A considerable number of proponents of gun control seem to know very little about the firearms they seek to regulate and so often sound ignorant when discussing gun control.

Magazine size is irrelevant.

It takes literally less than 2 seconds to swap a magazine.

It depends on the person how fast they can swap a magazine out. I can do a mag exchange in less than a second. Someone with less experience will take longer.

 

[Blues Man]

It depends on the person how fast they can swap a magazine out. I can do a mag exchange in less than a second. Someone with less experience will take longer.

Which is why I said 2 seconds.

Even a complete newbie can change a magazine in 2 seconds after a couple hours on the range

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The proponents of gun control know they can't get rid of guns in one legislative sweep, so they must do it in increments. Once they have achieved one targeted goal then they move to the next one. They keep moving forward until the second amendment protected right is all but gone.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Which is why I said 2 seconds.

Even a complete newbie can change a magazine in 2 seconds after a couple hours on the range

True.

 

[pknopp]

Would you like to make the case that every person shot by a cop was no danger to the cop or civilians?

Why?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why?

Make the case.

 

[pknopp]

Make the case.

Why would I? I have no obligation to address your (or others) attempts at deflection.

Valid shooting.

Shorewood police shooting: Man shot, killed after firing on officers outside hotel, police say

Not valid.

San Jose Police Wound Black Man Who Broke Up Bar Fight

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why would I? I have no obligation to address your (or others) attempts at deflection.

Valid shooting.

Shorewood police shooting: Man shot, killed after firing on officers outside hotel, police say

Not valid.

San Jose Police Wound Black Man Who Broke Up Bar Fight

Oh I see one link identifies the race and one doesn't.

 

[pknopp]

Oh I see one link identifies the race and one doesn't.

I suppose that is what you would see.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I suppose that is what you would see.

No it's what I read from your links.

 

[pknopp]

No it's what I read from your links.

I'm sure you did.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I'm sure you did.

I didn't write the news headline.
I didn't use the link.
You used the links. You used the one to fit your racist views

 

[pknopp]

I didn't write the news headline.
I didn't use the link.
You used the links. You used the one to fit your racist views

You went looking for race, not me. You can't do it. You can't say "yes they shot an innocent man with a gun".

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You went looking for race, not me. You can't do it. You can't say "yes they shot an innocent man with a gun".

I didn't open the link it was in the link head line stupid. Do you actually read what you post?

 

[pknopp]

I didn't open the link it was in the link head line stupid. Do you actually read what you post?

I understand. We are not disagreeing. You aren't interested in the facts, only in the race of those involved.

 

[BlackSand]

In an opinion piece found in the news and observer, this nut believes his words could bring us to a compromise.
As for me I might pay him a visit and show him how wrong he is.

https://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/article259852460.html

.

It is impossible to reach a compromise, if one entity in the compromise has nothing to offer in exchange.

If the author would like to re-establish the proposal as regulations enforced through popular consent and mob rule ...
That may be a more appropriate way of framing their ideas.

.​

 

[bigrebnc1775]

.

It is impossible to reach a compromise, if one entity in the compromise has nothing to offer in exchange.

If the author would like to re-establish the proposal as regulations enforced through popular consent and mob rule ...
That may be a more appropriate way of framing their ideas.

.​

It's a good thing we don't live in a democracy

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

In an opinion piece found in the news and observer, this nut believes his words could bring us to a compromise.
As for me I might pay him a visit and show him how wrong he is.

https://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/article259852460.html

That cock sucking motherfucker can eat a bullet.

No, you fucking cock suckers, we're going the other way or we're going to war.

Machine guns or Valhalla.

 

[bripat9643]

Nonsense term.

Those who support a ban on high-capacity magazines are likewise Second Amendment advocates,

Wrong. Banning so-called "high-capacity magazines" ios a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

You gun control wackos post idiocies like this and then expect people to take you seriously.

given the fact that such bans do not violate the Constitution and have not been invalidated by the Supreme Court.

They sure as hell do violate the Constitution. The court has let slide numerous violations of the Constitution, so that proves nothing.

To advocate for firearm regulatory measures consistent with Second Amendment jurisprudence is not to be ‘anti’- Second Amendment.

There are no regulatory measures consistent with the Second Amendment