Sec.of State Blinken the idiot approves NATO sending jets to Ukraine

[Sunni Man]

The U.S. and Eurotards are hell bent on turning the regional conflict of Ukraine into another West vs. East proxy war like the Korean war and Vietnam war.

Blinken says NATO countries have "green light" to send fighter jets to Ukraine

The secretary of state says the U.S. is considering providing fighter jets to Poland if the country sends its own to Ukraine.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[eagle1462010]

A few planes will change nothing there. It will not have a prayer against Russian Air Power. They would be destroyed on the ground.

Unless they are going to be like China in the Korean War........based out of Poland itself. Which could draw us into a NATO CONFLICT.

The EU said UKRAINE WILL NOT BE IN NATO...........Why isn't Russia LEAVING?

 

[Slade3200]

The U.S. and Eurotards are hell bent on turning the regional conflict of Ukraine into another West vs. East proxy war like the Korean war and Vietnam war.

Blinken says NATO countries have "green light" to send fighter jets to Ukraine

The secretary of state says the U.S. is considering providing fighter jets to Poland if the country sends its own to Ukraine.

www.cbsnews.com

Yup, Russia provoked the wrong superpower. The russkies best run back to their country and Vladi should hire a few extra guards to watch his back

 

[odanny]

God Bless America, and God Bless Ukraine.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The U.S. and Eurotards are hell bent on turning the regional conflict of Ukraine into another West vs. East proxy war like the Korean war and Vietnam war.

Blinken says NATO countries have "green light" to send fighter jets to Ukraine

The secretary of state says the U.S. is considering providing fighter jets to Poland if the country sends its own to Ukraine.

www.cbsnews.com

That you support Russian aggression is stupid and short sighted. If we allow Russia to gobble up her neighbors we will have a real problem real quick.

 

[JGalt]

Blinken doesn't run NATO. He gave the go-ahead but I doubt if any NATO countries will do that, because they're more afraid of Russia than we are.

 

[Sunni Man]

By turning what was essentially a local disagreement between two neighboring countries into an all out war. We can now expect the conflict in Ukraine to last for years and cost the American taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars. ...

 

[eagle1462010]

By turning what was essentially a local disagreement between two neighboring countries into an all out war. We can now expect the conflict in Ukraine to last for years and cost the American taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars. ...

The fighting there has been going on for years already. Just not the full scale invasion we have now.

They have sent a fig leaf out with UKRAINE NOT IN NATO...............where is PUTIN'S RESPONSE.....?

 

[Sunni Man]

Blinken doesn't run NATO. He gave the go-ahead but I doubt if any NATO countries will do that, because they're more afraid of Russia than we are.

The NATO countries are happy to provide the MiG-29 jet fighters knowing that Putin won't attack a NATO member. Plus, my guess is there is already plan by the U.S. government to replace the jets given to Ukraine with new advanced American jet fighters.

 

[Slade3200]

By turning what was essentially a local disagreement between two neighboring countries into an all out war. We can now expect the conflict in Ukraine to last for years and cost the American taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars. ...

Russia turned it into a war. Place the blame where blame is due

 

[eagle1462010]

The NATO countries are happy to provide the MiG-29 jet fighters and know that Putin won't attack a NATO member. Plus, my guess is there is already plan by the U.S. government to replace the jets given to Ukraine with new advanced American jet fighters.

And how long will they last? They don't have a prayer with Russia having air superiority..........IT IS A WASTE.......Only way is they launch and attack from a NATO COUNTRY. In which case Russia would have to attack POLAND to kill them.

This is all a dang COMEDY CENTRAL media production.

Now........NATO could take that airspace and destroy the Russian quickly.........But then the MAD principle kicks in.......

 

[Sunni Man]

The fighting there has been going on for years already. Just not the full scale invasion we have now. They have sent a fig leaf out with UKRAINE NOT IN NATO...............where is PUTIN'S RESPONSE.....?

Pres. Putin tried for years to warn the U,S, and EU that Ukraine had become a terrorist state ran by the criminal gangster Zelensky.
Finally, Putin had no choice but to send in Russian peace keeping soldiers and rescue the Ukrainian people from globalist tyranny.

 

[JGalt]

The NATO countries are happy to provide the MiG-29 jet fighters and know that Putin won't attack a NATO member. Plus, my guess is there is already plan by the U.S. government to replace the jets given to Ukraine with new advanced American jet fighters.

Let's see how many NATO countries jump at that. I bet none of them do.

 

[Donald H]

A few planes will change nothing there. It will not have a prayer against Russian Air Power. They would be destroyed on the ground.

Unless they are going to be like China in the Korean War........based out of Poland itself. Which could draw us into a NATO CONFLICT.

The EU said UKRAINE WILL NOT BE IN NATO...........Why isn't Russia LEAVING?

Because America won't agree and the talking point that is ensuring the ongoing death and destruction is US insistence on Ukraine having a right to become a Nato country.

That's not an argument pro or con; it's just the facts.

Does Ukraine have that right, considering that Nato is a military challenge to Russia's very existence?

Is a peaceful compromise possible, based on Russia's needs and Europe's needs?

Not as long as America portrays Russia's needs as something like world power. And portrays Putin as another madman

In a long string of other country's leaders who have been portrayed as mad men!

Peace is the objective and there's only one party that is preventing it from happening. Antiwar.com has several new stories every day that explain it from a 'peace' prospective by Americans who are motivated to reject the pro-war agenda.

 

[eagle1462010]

Pres. Putin tried for years to warn the U,S, and EU that Ukraine had become a terrorist state ran by the criminal gangster Zelensky.
Finally, Putin had no choice but to send in Russian peace keeping soldiers and rescue the Ukrainian people from globalist tyranny.

Of course he had a choice. And the fact that they are fighting him to the death shows THEY DON'T WANT TO BE PART OF RUSSIA.

He is using this to try and take all of Ukraine.........He needs to carry his happy ass back home.........

 

[eagle1462010]

Because America won't agree and the talking point that is ensuring the ongoing death and destruction is US insistence on Ukraine having a right to become a Nato country.

That's not an argument pro or con; it's just the facts.

Does Ukraine have that right, considering that Nato is a military challenge to Russia's very existence?

Is a peaceful compromise possible, based on Russia's needs and Europe's needs?

Not as long as America portrays Russia's needs as something like world power. And portrays Putin as another madman

In a long string of other country's leaders who have been portrayed as mad men!

Peace is the objective and there's only one party that is preventing it from happening. Antiwar.com has several new stories every day that explain it from a 'peace' prospective by Americans who are motivated to reject the pro-war agenda.

NATO was created for the USSR not the current RUSSIA...............All of these countries lived under USSR OPPRESSION til the USSR COLLAPSED........COLD WAR.

Ukraine was a break away country.........It didn't exist til after Reagan and the collapse of the USSR.

NATO is still for RUSSIA and is a pact between Europe and the United States that a attack against one is an attack against all.............It doesn't apply if one goes rouge and attacks Russia instead.

 

[Donald H]

Russia turned it into a war. Place the blame where blame is due

There are more likely culprits and Americans themselves are bringing the answer through antiwar.com

By using Ukraine to fight Russia, the US provoked Putin's war

After backing a far-right coup in 2014, the US has fueled a proxy war in eastern Ukraine that has left 14,000 dead. Russia's invasion is an illegal and catastrophic response.

mate.substack.com

The US is using Ukraine to fight Russia.

 

[Sunni Man]

Most of the former Eastern Block countries that are now NATO members still use the MiG-29 as their main jet fighter.
Zelensky is begging NATO for MiG-29's because that's these jet fighters are the ones Ukraine pilot's have been trained to fly.
But all this is going to do is prolong the fighting of a war Ukraine can't win, and cost thousands of civilian lives.

 

[eagle1462010]

There are more likely culprits and Americans themselves are bringing the answer through antiwar.com

By using Ukraine to fight Russia, the US provoked Putin's war

After backing a far-right coup in 2014, the US has fueled a proxy war in eastern Ukraine that has left 14,000 dead. Russia's invasion is an illegal and catastrophic response.

mate.substack.com

The US is using Ukraine to fight Russia.

During the Cold War both the USSR and Us fought each other all over the world with our weapons. Because of the same scenario today. We can't fight each other because of the Nukes........

This is NOTHING DIFFERENT.........except that the USSR doesn't exist and Russia is not as near as powerful as then.

 

[eagle1462010]

Most of the former Eastern Block countries that are now NATO members still use the MiG-29 as their main jet fighter.
Zelensky is begging NATO for MiG-29's because that's these jet fighters are the ones Ukraine pilot's have been trained to fly.
But all this is going to do is prolong the fighting of a war Ukraine can't win, and cost thousands of civilian lives.

And where will they be safe to park in Ukraine...........lmao