You tell me what "We do not support Taiwan Independence" mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so youre a chinese operative that knows everything china thinks,,China has never intended to take back Taiwan by military force.
Blinken, in desperation to stop the China/Russia military alliance, knows nothing else.
But no American should be thinking that he's not saying what has been thoroughly discussed by the Pentagon, his president, and his government.
That kind of loose cannon simply doesn't exist.
On an optimistic note for America, China and Russia will still offer peaceful coexistence with extreme caution!
No, I'm not a Chinese operative. That's just being silly!so youre a chinese operative that knows everything china thinks,,
we already knew that,,
you should educate yourself better,,Carefully chosen words from Blinken?
Read him as saying that America will continue to arm Taiwan in preparation for a US proxy war, if China will tolerate it.
Or in other words, the same now well known tactics that were used in the Ukraine.
then how could you know the inner thinkings of the CCP???No, I'm not a Chinese operative. That's just being silly!
But it's not hard to see the similarity in the game plan with the Ukraine proxy war.
It's just my guess of course but does it make better sense than suggesting that Blinken has become a loose cannon speaking out of turn?
China has never intended to take back Taiwan by military force.
Blinken, in desperation to stop the China/Russia military alliance, knows nothing else.
But no American should be thinking that he's not saying what has been thoroughly discussed by the Pentagon, his president, and his government.
That kind of loose cannon simply doesn't exist.
On an optimistic note for America, China and Russia will still offer peaceful coexistence with extreme caution!
You tell me what "We do not support Taiwan Independence" mean?
Wow. Cool speech.As a history of US China relations, Kissenger described this
I think the art of this period consists of not challenging the principle of "one China" and leaving open the possibility of an ultimate resolution, but also making very clear that the United States has an intense interest in a peaceful resolution. To enable Taiwan to continue its autonomous existence without facing the issue of its precise legal status and while maintaining the basic principle of "one China" is a delicate road to go, but every American president now for 30 years has managed to walk that.
Every time there has been an attempt to disturb it, it led to two things. It led to immediate intense conflict with China, and it led to a reaffirmation in the end, because nobody wanted a major confrontation with China to this principle of a "one China" policy within which Taiwan is finding a place now. Its own position has greatly improved since the Nixon policy. It is richer, it is stronger and it is participating in many international organizations.
You tell me what "We do not support Taiwan Independence" mean?