JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #281
Lieability, no debate exists on this matter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What comparison? I made no comparison. I stated a couple of facts: My brothers are USMC so they are courageous and they have been waterboarded with no ill effect.
If there is an idiot around, it ain't me. The evidence suggests it is you and a few others.
Can you prove you have brothers in the USMC who were waterboarded? It's a meritless claim without proof.
It doesn't matter if what she said is true or not. Nobody can honestly compare a voluntary simulation to actual waterboarding.
We already know waterboarding is torture. It's already been defined and signed long ago. There is no debate, only attempts at rationalization from those who are for using this method of torture to extract information from our captive enemies.
Wrong.
We don't "know" any such thing.
In reality, waterboarding appears NOT to qualify as "torture" under a VALID and appropriate defintion of the term.
So, yes, there IS a debate.
Nice try. No points.
I do support the use of this rather extreme technique to extract necessary information from the barbarians who are content beheading their "enemies" while alive and conscious are to send them hurtling at 500+ mph into occupied skyscrapers. You can falsely procalim that to be a rationalization all you wish. But your saying it doesn't make it so.
Waterboarding: A Tortured History : NPRCases of waterboarding have occurred on U.S. soil, as well. In 1983, Texas Sheriff James Parker was charged, along with three of his deputies, for handcuffing prisoners to chairs, placing towels over their faces, and pouring water on the cloth until they gave what the officers considered to be confessions. The sheriff and his deputies were all convicted and sentenced to four years in prison.
We already know waterboarding is torture. It's already been defined and signed long ago. There is no debate, only attempts at rationalization from those who are for using this method of torture to extract information from our captive enemies.
Wrong.
We don't "know" any such thing.
In reality, waterboarding appears NOT to qualify as "torture" under a VALID and appropriate defintion of the term.
So, yes, there IS a debate.
Nice try. No points.
I do support the use of this rather extreme technique to extract necessary information from the barbarians who are content beheading their "enemies" while alive and conscious are to send them hurtling at 500+ mph into occupied skyscrapers. You can falsely procalim that to be a rationalization all you wish. But your saying it doesn't make it so.
That's exactly what it is: Rationalizion.
And Liability you know full well from Dogbert's post above that our country has signed the UN Conventions Against Torture which defines waterboarding as torture. We have prosecuted and executed the Japanese for using this method against our soldiers in WWII.
Then there is always this:
Waterboarding: A Tortured History : NPRCases of waterboarding have occurred on U.S. soil, as well. In 1983, Texas Sheriff James Parker was charged, along with three of his deputies, for handcuffing prisoners to chairs, placing towels over their faces, and pouring water on the cloth until they gave what the officers considered to be confessions. The sheriff and his deputies were all convicted and sentenced to four years in prison.
Fuck NPR....they're hacks for the Democrats. They're paid to lie to us by Democraps using our tax-dollars.
Fuck NPR....they're hacks for the Democrats. They're paid to lie to us by Democraps using our tax-dollars.
NPR is paid to lie to Americans?
OK, there went your creditibility on this issue and on NPR.
mudwhistle, you are wrong. There is no reasonable-person standard for debate here. Waterboarding is torture.
Mudwhistle, I don't believe the comments about the NPR interview @ Campbell. You will have to do far better than that. NPR paid to lie to Americans? You are. That you don't like that waterboarding is torture is irrelevant. By law, by internation convention, and by a reasonable-person standard, it has always been and always will be torture.
SOME instances internationAL agreements do call it torture. By "law" it may or may not be torture. Depends on the law and the context. .....
Mudwhistle, I don't believe the comments about the NPR interview @ Campbell. You will have to do far better than that. NPR paid to lie to Americans? You are. That you don't like that waterboarding is torture is irrelevant. By law, by internation convention, and by a reasonable-person standard, it has always been and always will be torture.
SOME instances internationAL agreements do call it torture. By "law" it may or may not be torture. Depends on the law and the context. .....
Now you are backing up, getting ready to turn and run scared. Yeah, waterboarding is torture,
SOME instances internationAL agreements do call it torture. By "law" it may or may not be torture. Depends on the law and the context. .....
Now you are backing up, getting ready to turn and run scared. Yeah, waterboarding is torture,
Wrong AGAIN, ya assbite! It's amazing that someone with your brains
can even breathe!
If you had bothered to read some of my earlier posts (not that you would; "Why bother knowing what you're talking about?" could be written in Latin on your family crest), you would have seen that I conceded the possibility yesterday.
But that's not "backing up," you idiot. That's called honesty.
No wonder you wouldn't recognize it.
Lieability and Mudwhistle have learned how to entertain others with their fumbling and bumbling and stumbling and mumbling on this thread.
They bring a smile to each of us who reads them.
Thanks, you two.
Liability, you are so full of crap, it is painful to even look at your posts. We prosecuted Japnese after WWII for Waterboarding. It was a decided issue until DICK talked his chimp W into authorizing it again. So, a recovering alcoholic was the "Decider" and made a very lame decision.
When our military is captured in the future, they will certainly be Waterboarded, probably to and beyond the point of death, all because W and DICK felt it was legal and got some "yes" man attorney to write that decision. Where is that guy working now, by the way? How did that go for him?
Can you prove you have brothers in the USMC who were waterboarded? It's a meritless claim without proof.
It doesn't matter if what she said is true or not. Nobody can honestly compare a voluntary simulation to actual waterboarding.
So is this an admission that only what the detainee was thinking made any difference on how he was treated or simply *felt* he was being treated?
Waterboarding is a mind-game...nothing more. You think you're gonna drown. It's an involuntary response to panic when this happens....and the fact that KSM thought he was gonna drown at the hands of these evil Americans he literally spilled his guts in 90 seconds. The fact libs hate the technique is a testament to it's effectiveness.
And what literally galls me is that Americans are so damned worried about the feelings of a terrorist in the first place. It makes me sick to my stomach to call you a fellow American.