Sean Hanity sums it up

[Mac-7]

If it's all of the above, capitalism is 10x worse. Believe whatever nonsense toots your horn.

View attachment 682367​

If the world had been communist since WWII science would still be marching along using pencil and paper instead of computers

 

[Red Front]

If the world had been communist since WWII science would still be marching along using pencil and paper instead of computers

What a dumb statement. Trailer parks shouldn't have internet.

The Soviets were the first in space, less than 20 years after WW2. The Soviet Union was invaded by 4 million Germans and their infrastructure was devastated by the war. They lost nine million soldiers on the battlefield and 17 million civilians. Thanks to socialism, they were able to rebuild their infrastructure and become a world power once again, as they were in the late 1930s, in about 12 years. While they were rebuilding they were developing new technology:

Russian inventions in the soviet era: from Tetris to 3D holography

Discover some of the most well known Russian inventions - how competition led to innovation

www.inventions-handbook.com

5 Russian inventions that you didn’t know exist - Red Kalinka

The history of inventions is often surrounded by controversy because of one question: Who was its real inventor? Very often in history, someone creates a new product. It is a brilliant idea but, for different reasons it is ignored until someone else....

www.redkalinka.com

The Soviets made a lot of contributions to Science. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Mac-7]

What a dumb statement. Trailer parks shouldn't have internet.

View attachment 682551​

The Soviets were the first in space, less than 20 years after WW2. The Soviet Union was invaded by 4 million Germans and their infrastructure was devastated by the war. They lost nine million soldiers on the battlefield and 17 million civilians. Thanks to socialism, they were able to rebuild their infrastructure and become a world power once again, as they were in the late 1930s, in about 12 years. While they were rebuilding they were developing new technology:

Russian inventions in the soviet era: from Tetris to 3D holography

Discover some of the most well known Russian inventions - how competition led to innovation

www.inventions-handbook.com

5 Russian inventions that you didn’t know exist - Red Kalinka

The history of inventions is often surrounded by controversy because of one question: Who was its real inventor? Very often in history, someone creates a new product. It is a brilliant idea but, for different reasons it is ignored until someone else....

www.redkalinka.com

The Soviets made a lot of contributions to Science. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

The soviets made ZERO contributions that benefited the human race

They devoted their energy to acquiring power over the rest of the human race

 

[GWV5903]

Would they? Because frankly, while you guys are great at insisting the unwanted fetus should be born, you don't seem terribly keen on making sure they have the resources for a productive life.

I grew up in a low end middle class neighborhood with a single mother, it didn’t prevent me from being successful. There were multiple times I could have gone into the abyss, but I decided to work hard and it paid off.

You see, here's the thing. Because I had parents who wanted me, they made sure I went to nice schools (even though they were run by Catholic Psychopaths), had enough to eat, and got me going in the right direction.

Most homes in America provided the same thing, it doesn’t mean they’re going to be successful.

Compared to the poor kid who can't get education, health care, nutrition because the Right Wing are too busy cutting school lunches to give tax breaks to billionaires.

Yeah that billionaire is a Liberal in many cases…you understand most millionaires are conservative? Sad truth is your as naïve as they come and you act like you’re an expert….

 

[JoeB131]

If you think there are too many people on the planet, and that the population needs to be reduced, then start with yourself.

The average unborn child will surely contribute more to society than you ever have or will.

I don't think the population needs to be reduced, I think it needs to be controlled.

Of course, in much of the third world, the fetuses that aren't aborted end up starving, dying from a lack of clean water, etc.

Have you ever noticed this…?

Whenever someone speaks of the world being overpopulated, and claims that some people should die in order to reduce the excess population, they never think that they, themselves, are the ones that should die. Always, they think someone else should die, who they consider inferior to themselves.

And almost always, those who claim this are among those whose deaths would be most beneficial to society and to humanity as a whole.

Fetuses aren't people, so preventing them from ever being isn't killing them. Ideally, contraception is preferable to abortion, but abortion is preferable to children being born into grinding poverty. If you want to know the difference between first world and third world countries today, it's access to birth control and abortion.

The most important resource that a young child needs, to grow up right, is an intact family, with his father and his mother faithfully married to each other, showing him by example how to be a decent, productive adult. The the thing that you most devoutly hate and condemn are the moral standards that produce this environment. You had this benefit, but you are glad to see it denied to other children

You can have moral standards without trembling in fear of an imaginary sky pixie.

The problem is, most women who have abortions don't have guys who are ready for marriage, or aren't ready themselves. Let's be blunt. Back in my Dad's day, after he left the Army in WWII, he was able to come home, join the Union, and make a living wage. So he had what he needed when he married my mom and started raising kids.

CONVERSELY, today kids can't make a living wage until they are college graduates, then them spend years paying down their student loans. And then, maybe, maybe by the time they hit their 30's.... they can rush to have kids before the ovaries start spitting out Down Syndrome Retards.

That used to be one of the Democraps' favorite false accusations to hurl at Republicans, that we wanted to make schoolchildren go hungry.

For the most part, they stopped hurling that accusation when it actually happened when a political agenda was enacted that really did result in schoolchildren going hungry. Don't you remember Michelle Obama's school lunch proposals, that went into effect, with the result that instead of consisting of proper amounts of decent-quality food, school lunches came to consist of inadequate amounts of poor-quality, and often inedible “food”? That was your side that did that.

Uh, what I remember was that Mrs. Obama tried to get food that was nutritious instead of outsourcing it to fast food franchises. Problem is, kids wont eat their veggies if their parents aren't standing there watching them. So like a lot of Democratic policies, good intentions, bad results.

As opposed to the GOP, who not only want to cut School Lunches, but Head Start, SNAP, TANF, Section 8 or anything else that might benefit poor kids.

The innocent victim of every abortion doesn't choose to die. It's a very safe bet that nearly all of them, if given the choice, would choose to live.

So what's your point? 2/3rd of zygotes never attach to the uterine wall, and 20% of pregnancies end up in miscarriage. Given the choice, I suspect all of them would choose to live, too.

 

[Red Front]

The soviets made ZERO contributions that benefited the human race

They devoted their energy to acquiring power over the rest of the human race

Your statements are so stupid that they're not even worth responding to. If anything it's the United States under capitalism/imperialism that did more harm to humanity, not the Soviet Union. You're just a brainwashed working-class person, defending his capitalist fief-lord master.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Fetuses aren't people…

And it's still a hateful lie, just as it was every previous time you told it, and every time you yet tell it.

You're no different than a Nazi screaming that Jews are not people, for the same motive.

 

[JoeB131]

The soviets made ZERO contributions that benefited the human race

YOu mean other than defeating Fascism?

I grew up in a low end middle class neighborhood with a single mother, it didn’t prevent me from being successful. There were multiple times I could have gone into the abyss, but I decided to work hard and it paid off.

Yet, if you go to the prisons, you are going to find nearly every last one of them was the product of a single parent home.

Yeah that billionaire is a Liberal in many cases…you understand most millionaires are conservative? Sad truth is your as naïve as they come and you act like you’re an expert….

The problem is the Millionaire and Billionaire class supported the GOP for years, but even they are starting to realize the level of crazy the theocratic wing of the party is engaging in.

 

[Red Front]

I don't think the population needs to be reduced, I think it needs to be controlled.

Of course, in much of the third world, the fetuses that aren't aborted end up starving, dying from a lack of clean water, etc.



Fetuses aren't people, so preventing them from ever being isn't killing them. Ideally, contraception is preferable to abortion, but abortion is preferable to children being born into grinding poverty. If you want to know the difference between first world and third world countries today, it's access to birth control and abortion.



You can have moral standards without trembling in fear of an imaginary sky pixie.

The problem is, most women who have abortions don't have guys who are ready for marriage, or aren't ready themselves. Let's be blunt. Back in my Dad's day, after he left the Army in WWII, he was able to come home, join the Union, and make a living wage. So he had what he needed when he married my mom and started raising kids.

CONVERSELY, today kids can't make a living wage until they are college graduates, then them spend years paying down their student loans. And then, maybe, maybe by the time they hit their 30's.... they can rush to have kids before the ovaries start spitting out Down Syndrome Retards.



Uh, what I remember was that Mrs. Obama tried to get food that was nutritious instead of outsourcing it to fast food franchises. Problem is, kids wont eat their veggies if their parents aren't standing there watching them. So like a lot of Democratic policies, good intentions, bad results.

As opposed to the GOP, who not only want to cut School Lunches, but Head Start, SNAP, TANF, Section 8 or anything else that might benefit poor kids.



So what's your point? 2/3rd of zygotes never attach to the uterine wall, and 20% of pregnancies end up in miscarriage. Given the choice, I suspect all of them would choose to live, too.

You made some great points. Thanks.

 

[JoeB131]

And it's still a hateful lie, just as it was every previous time you told it, and every time you yet tell it.

You're no different than a Nazi screaming that Jews are not people, for the same motive.

Please point out where Fetuses were ever declared people for purposes of tax collection, censuses, litigation or any other facet other than the goofy fetal homicide laws?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Please point out where Fetuses were ever declared people for purposes of tax collection, censuses, litigation or any other facet other than the goofy fetal homicide laws?

The worth of a human being is not dependent on how government recognizes or treats his existence.

There is no point to your argument that could not equally support the premise that the victims of the Nazi Holocaust were not human beings. Or the slaves that were imported and kept as such in our own country's early history.

 

[JoeB131]

The worth of a human being is not dependent on how government recognizes or treats his existence.

There is no point to your argument that could not equally support the premise that the victims of the Nazi Holocaust were not human beings. Or the slaves that were imported and kept as such in our own country's early history.

Except not really.

The Jews of the Holocaust DID pay taxes before the Nazis came to power and even before it. They WERE counted on censuses... this is how we have a pretty good idea of how many people Hitler killed, because someone actually bothered to count them before they were killed. They actually had names.

Same thing with slaves. Slaves WERE counted in the census. In fact, the Constitution had a specific clauses on how to count slaves for purposes of congressional/electoral apportionment. There were laws governing the humane treatment of slaves. You could be charged with murder for killing your slave. Slaves had names.

It is disingenuous to think that a Kidney bean sized fetus or a zygote no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence merits the same consideration.

 

[beautress]

Wow, it's fun to watch the Doomsday Cult drink the koolaid.

The same people who spent 70 million dollars proving Bill Clinton lied about getting a blow job are the ones whining that Trump is getting a bad deal for walking off with FIFTEEN BOXES of sensitive documents.

How arrogant of you to say such poppycock things.

 

[beautress]

Except not really.

The Jews of the Holocaust DID pay taxes before the Nazis came to power and even before it. They WERE counted on censuses... this is how we have a pretty good idea of how many people Hitler killed, because someone actually bothered to count them before they were killed. They actually had names.

Same thing with slaves. Slaves WERE counted in the census. In fact, the Constitution had a specific clauses on how to count slaves for purposes of congressional/electoral apportionment. There were laws governing the humane treatment of slaves. You could be charged with murder for killing your slave. Slaves had names.

It is disingenuous to think that a Kidney bean sized fetus or a zygote no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence merits the same consideration.

How expedient that you can beat up on a one-inch being. Jeffrey Dahmer picked on boys smaller than himself to do the murder deed, and he thought nothing of torturing and murdering many of them. You're only accordance seems to go with beasts.

 

[Red Front]

And it's still a hateful lie, just as it was every previous time you told it, and every time you yet tell it.

You're no different than a Nazi screaming that Jews are not people, for the same motive.

Even your Bible doesn't consider fetuses equal to life outside of the womb. If you respond "I don't care about the Bible", well, where did you get this idea that an embryo or fetus is a human person and fullfledged member of society? The actual human being is the woman, not the embryo or fetus hence her wellbeing and interests should take precedence over that of an embryo or fetus. If you're a Republican, you really don't have any moral high ground upon which to stand and condemn anyone for being pro-choice. Conservatives like you are sanctimoniously, trying to force pregnant women to remain pregnant for nine months, while you are defunding social programs that help low-income, single mothers feed and house their children. Are you going to support that single mother when she loses her job, as a result of her pregnancy? Are you going to give her a room in your home?

You defend government policies that undermine a single mother's ability to remain pregnant and give birth to a child that she's going to be able to raise (feed, house, staying up all night for several months attending to her infant's needs at 2 am when he/she starts crying, changing diapers.etc). The likelihood of a single woman remaining pregnant and giving birth to a child that she's going to be able to care for is significantly reduced thanks to your views on government and its role in society. Private charities are not enough to meet the needs of the poor in modern society, due to the scale of the problem. Government is a social apparatus organized by the people to manage their large-scale socioeconomic civil affairs and projects. It's a societal management tool, that's it. It's not inherently good, nor is it inherently evil, it's whatever we want it to be. So flippantly dismissing the needs of single mothers, by saying "oh well, they can turn to private charity or open a GoFundMe account", is not the way to effectively resolve the issue, due to its scale and complexity. We need the government to resolve these large-scale societal ills, not private charity.

You want to force women who are pregnant to give birth, but then you make it more difficult for them to remain pregnant and give birth to a child that they can raise. Single mothers need healthcare, food, housing, job training, daycare for their children, school lunch programs, clothing and school supplies for their children..etc. If you're defunding government programs that provide these services, because you refuse to pay an extra 1% or 2% sales tax or an extra $20 monthly in taxes, when you're regularly buying $28 pizzas at Papa Johns, three times a week, why should anyone take your concern for embryos and fetuses (in other people's bodies) seriously? It's just hypocristy. You don't give a shit about the children or their single mothers, but we're suppose to believe that you're really concerned about embryos and fetuses in other people's wombs? It's nothing but self righteous bullshit. You don't give a rats ass, about the children in Cuba or Afghanistan that are suffering as a result of the economic sanctions being imposed upon them by our government, yet you're supposedly a righteous champion of fetuses.

THE CHAMPION OF FETUSES
(IN OTHER PEOPLE'S BODIES)
​

You just don't like women having sex out of marriage, hence you want to impose pregnancy upon them as a punishment. That's really what it's all about for you religious folks.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Except not really.

The Jews of the Holocaust DID pay taxes before the Nazis came to power and even before it. They WERE counted on censuses... this is how we have a pretty good idea of how many people Hitler killed, because someone actually bothered to count them before they were killed. They actually had names.

Same thing with slaves. Slaves WERE counted in the census. In fact, the Constitution had a specific clauses on how to count slaves for purposes of congressional/electoral apportionment. There were laws governing the humane treatment of slaves. You could be charged with murder for killing your slave. Slaves had names.

It is disingenuous to think that a Kidney bean sized fetus or a zygote no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence merits the same consideration.

A human being is a human being because that is what he inherently is. Your arguments about whether someone is a human being based on how government responds to his existence is absurd.

If government told you that two plus two equals ten, would you believe that? That if you add these dots •• to these dots ••, you get this many dots ••••••••••? If government told you that, would you believe it?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Even your Bible doesn't consider fetuses equal to life outside of the womb. If you respond "I don't care about the Bible", well, where did you get this idea that an embryo or fetus is a human person and fullfledged member of society? The actual human being is the woman, not the embryo or fetus hence her wellbeing and interests should take precedence over that of an embryo or fetus. If you're a Republican, you really don't have any moral high ground upon which to stand and condemn anyone for being pro-choice. Conservatives like you are sanctimoniously, trying to force pregnant women to remain pregnant for nine months, while you are defunding social programs that help low-income, single mothers feed and house their children. Are you going to support that single mother when she loses her job, as a result of her pregnancy? Are you going to give her a room in your home?

You defend government policies that undermine a single mother's ability to remain pregnant and give birth to a child that she's going to raise (feed, house, staying up all night for several months attending to her infant's needs at 2 am when he/she starts crying, changing diapers.etc). The likelihood of a single woman remaining pregnant and giving birth to a child that she's going to be able to care for is significantly reduced thanks to your views on government and its role in society. Private charities are not enough to meet the needs of the poor in modern society, due to the scale of the problem. Government is a social apparatus organized by the people to manage their large-scale socioeconomic civil affairs and projects. It's a societal management tool, that's it. It's not inherently good, nor is it inherently evil, it's whatever we want it to be. So flippantly dismissing the needs of single mothers, by saying "oh well, they can turn to private charity or open a GoFundMe account", is not the way to effectively resolve the issue, due to its scale and complexity.

You want to force women who are pregnant to give birth, but then you make it more difficult for them to remain pregnant and give birth to a child that they can raise. Single mothers need healthcare, food, housing, job training, daycare for their children, school lunch programs, clothing and school supplies for their children..etc. If you're defunding government programs that provide these services, because you refuse to pay an extra 1% or 2% sales tax or an extra $20 monthly in taxes, when you're regularly buying $28 pizzas at Papa Johns, three times a week, why should anyone take your concern for embryos and fetuses seriously? It's just hypocristy. You don't give a shit about the children or their single mothers, but we're suppose to believe that you're really concerned about embryos and fetuses in other people's wombs. You don't give a rats ass, about the children in Cuba or Afghanistan that are suffering as a result of the economic sanctions being imposed by our government, yet you're a righteous champion of fetuses.

View attachment 682647
THE CHAMPION OF FETUSES
(IN OTHER PEOPLE'S BODIES)​

I'm not interested in lies from a Godless Communist piece of shit purporting to tell me what my Bible says. Even the Devil himself will quote scripture, twisting it to his ends. And Satan is a lot better at it than you are.

 

[Red Front]

A human being is a human being because that is what he inherently is. Your arguments about whether someone is a human being based on how government responds to his existence is absurd.

If government told you that two plus two equals ten, would you believe that? That if you add these dots •• to these dots ••, you get this many dots ••••••••••? If government told you that, would you believe it?

Who decided that an embryo or fetus is a human person or being, with the same rights as the mother (the actual human being)? Who decided that? You? You're reducing human beings to zygotes, embryos, and fetuses? This has the same rights:

As this:

or this:

Really? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND?

​

One is a potential human being and person and the others are actual human beings and persons. The health and interests of the mother (the actual human being) takes precedence over:

A POTENTIAL
THE ACTUAL TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER A POTENTIAL...​

No one should force her to actualize that embryo or fetus into a human being and member of society. That should be her decision, not yours or mine. What it comes down to is our personal definition of what is a human being and person. In your mind and Christian world, a zygote:

Has all of the same rights as this:

We say "NO WAY, that's absurd", and you say "YES indeed, that makes perfect sense".
​

Potential human beings, don't have human rights. Human beings have rights because society gives them rights. Rights come from society. You didn't know that? Who gave you your rights? Did an angel come down from heaven and hand you the "Luminous Book Of Human Rights"? No. It's human beings that decide what type of society they want to create. You want to create a society where everyone only has sex when they're married and ready to be a parent. Well, that's nice, but unfortunately, we don't live in that perfect, ideal Christian world of yours. Even in church, there are people fornicating and committing adultery, so this righteous, holy world of yours where women have to be sexually pure and chaste, doesn't exist and will not exist, in the foreseeable future, if ever. The practice of forcing single women (even all women, single or not), to remain pregnant when they get pregnant, might be acceptable in church but it shouldn't be imposed upon the general population.

Now if you want to impose your Christian, religious ideals upon everyone else, stop complaining about liberals or socialists like myself imposing our values and views upon Christians. How about that? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Let's just admit that there is a struggle between religious people like yourself and those who don't believe or follow your religion when it comes to government policy. Stop crying about the government imposing mask mandates in the middle of a deadly pandemic, saying the government doesn't have the right to violate your personal sovereignty over your body when you are trying to violate the personal sovereignty of women over their bodies. The embryo and fetus are part of a woman's body and don't, at least in the first few months of pregnancy, have a right to remain attached to a woman's body. To believe otherwise is just a matter of opinion. If you want to pretend you're holy because you're defending embryos and fetuses, go right ahead, that's your pathology.

​

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Potential human beings, don't have human rights. Human beings have rights because society gives them rights. Rights come from society.

You're a Godless Communist piece of shit.

We all know what Communism's history is, with regard to human rights.

You have absolutely no credibility whatsoever on the subject. Less, so, even, than Incel Joe, and that's an extraordinarily low bar for you to be below.

 

[Red Front]

You're a Godless Communist piece of shit.

We all know what Communism's history is, with regard to human rights.

You have absolutely no credibility whatsoever on the subject. Less, so, even, than Incel Joe, and that's an extraordinarily low bar for you to be below.

You're the one who is the pathetic punk piece of excrement, pretending to care about fetuses in other people's bodies when you don't give a rats about single mothers and their children. You can claim you do, but you really don't by defunding government social programs that allow them to remain pregnant and raise their children. As far as your views on communism's history, that is nothing more than your ignorance and not even worth responding to, especially when it's a defender of capitalist imperialism that is talking shit. Your "god" is the devil, my God is everything that is good, noble, and beautiful. You Christians are a bunch of disgusting, braindead hypocrites.