Sean Hanity sums it up

[Marener]

haha how is that?

Rep. Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

Director Comey: No.

 

[surada]

you have no idea if they all do. Violation of that act is not a crime either, it’s a civil penalty.

that’s no bases for a raid, especially since trump was working with the NA.

So now, you cultist are changing your narrative…it wasn’t over classified material. gotcha

Trump made it a felony when he wanted to go after Hillary.

 

[Marener]

hahah whatever makes you feel better about yourself

either way, they were clearly marked

A small c is not a clear marking. Furthermore, the information wasn’t even classified at the time of the email. So the worst you can say is that there emails had a incomplete marking that something wasnt even classified.

Meanwhile Trump had clearly and properly marked top secret documents that were top secret.

 

[struth]

Rep. Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

Director Comey: No.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Director Comey's statement to the press on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

www.fbi.gov

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information

There was, without question, marked classified material on the illegal server that was not secured.

 

[struth]

A small c is not a clear marking. Furthermore, the information wasn’t even classified at the time of the email. So the worst you can say is that there emails had a incomplete marking that something wasnt even classified.

Meanwhile Trump had clearly and properly marked top secret documents that were top secret.

What was unclear about the C? Did she not have her reading glasses? \

Yes, the information was classified at the time. At least some of the thousands was. Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

 

[Marener]

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Director Comey's statement to the press on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

www.fbi.gov

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information

There was, without question, marked classified material on the illegal server that was not secured.

Nope. Not classified. It was classified but they became unclassified after the decision was made to make a call with a foreign official.

State: Some classified markings in Clinton emails were 'human error'

At issue is how important was the material discussed in the Clinton email case.

www.politico.com

 

[Marener]

I

What was unclear about the C? Did she not have her reading glasses? \

Yes, the information was classified at the time. At least some of the thousands was. Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Because there were no other classification markings that would indicate the document was actually classified as all classified documents would have.

Rep. Cartwright: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that had the little “c” in the text someplace?

Director Comey: No, there were three e-mails. The “c” was in the body in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text.

Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.

In addition, the State Department spokesperson made clear yesterday that these emails, which discussed call information for the Secretary, included these “c”s by mistake, and the information was not in fact classified:

“Generally speaking, there’s a standard process for developing call sheets for the Secretary of State. Call sheets are often marked – it’s not untypical at all for them to be marked at the confidential level - prior to a decision by the Secretary that he or she will make that call. Oftentimes, once it is clear that the Secretary intends to make a call, the department will then consider the call sheet SBU, sensitive but unclassified, or unclassified altogether, and then mark it appropriately and prepare it for the secretary’s use in actually making the call. The classification of a call sheet therefore is not necessarily fixed in time, and staffers in the Secretary’s office who are involved in preparing and finalizing these call sheets, they understand that. … Those markings were a human error. They didn’t need to be there.”

 

[struth]

Nope. Not classified. It was classified but they became unclassified after the decision was made to make a call with a foreign official.

State: Some classified markings in Clinton emails were 'human error'

At issue is how important was the material discussed in the Clinton email case.

www.politico.com

bhahaha ALL of them? Just stop. Comey made the statement, are you calling him a liar now?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Rep. Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

Director Comey: No.

C is for cookie.

 

[struth]

I

Because there were no other classification markings that would indicate the document was actually classified as all classified documents would have.

Rep. Cartwright: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that had the little “c” in the text someplace?

Director Comey: No, there were three e-mails. The “c” was in the body in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text.

Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.

In addition, the State Department spokesperson made clear yesterday that these emails, which discussed call information for the Secretary, included these “c”s by mistake, and the information was not in fact classified:

“Generally speaking, there’s a standard process for developing call sheets for the Secretary of State. Call sheets are often marked – it’s not untypical at all for them to be marked at the confidential level - prior to a decision by the Secretary that he or she will make that call. Oftentimes, once it is clear that the Secretary intends to make a call, the department will then consider the call sheet SBU, sensitive but unclassified, or unclassified altogether, and then mark it appropriately and prepare it for the secretary’s use in actually making the call. The classification of a call sheet therefore is not necessarily fixed in time, and staffers in the Secretary’s office who are involved in preparing and finalizing these call sheets, they understand that. … Those markings were a human error. They didn’t need to be there.”

It didn't need any other marking...the C stood for classified....it was classified at the time.

You are such a dembot cultist.

 

[struth]

C is for cookie.

hahah

Yeah, let's be for real here....nothing the Obama admin did with classified material was according to the manual. That's how reckless and careless they were with classified material.

Literally Comey said it would have been more secure on google, then with Clinton

 

[Marener]

bhahaha ALL of them? Just stop. Comey made the statement, are you calling him a liar now?

There were three. Just three.

I think the State Dept knows more about how State Dept information is classified than Comey. This was a specific and technical difference that Comey would not be expected to know anything about.

 

[Marener]

It didn't need any other marking...the C stood for classified....it was classified at the time.

You are such a dembot cultist.

To be properly marked, it ABSOLUTELY needed other markings.

There’s a world of difference between a small c (which stands for confidential the lowest rank of classification) and properly marked top secret documents which Trump was keeping in his basement.

 

[struth]

There were three. Just three.

I think the State Dept knows more about how State Dept information is classified than Comey. This was a specific and technical difference that Comey would not be expected to know anything about.

hahahah well President Trump knows more about his documents then the Xiden DOJ. So there is that defense too.

Either way, Comey literally conclude that Google would have been more secure and safer then letting the Obama admin, with Clinton running State, handle classified material.

 

[struth]

To be properly marked, it ABSOLUTELY needed other markings.

There’s a world of difference between a small c (which stands for confidential the lowest rank of classification) and properly marked top secret documents which Trump was keeping in his basement.

It was marked, it was classified at the time.

There were Top Secret material on Clinton's server. It was less secure then even having them on Google for goodness sake.

And you have no idea how the material Trump has was marked...nor that it was even still classified. He had the power to declassify anything at any time and any moment...Clinton did not.

 

[Marener]

hahahah well President Trump knows more about his documents then the Xiden DOJ. So there is that defense too.

Either way, Comey literally conclude that Google would have been more secure and safer then letting the Obama admin, with Clinton running State, handle classified material.

If Trump knows so much about classification, then that’s even worse because he can’t claim he didn’t know he was breaking the law. But if push actually does come to shove, Trump will probably claim ignorance as he did in his previous fraud cases.

Comey said a lot of things that he shouldn’t have.

DOJ watchdog slams Comey for claiming Clinton’s server could have been hacked

No public evidence has emerged to indicate that hackers compromised Clinton’s private server.

www.politico.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

I have to admit watching demonrats and their buddies at cnn et al bought a smile to my face. I love the whining. But the love libtards have for a corrupt, incompetent career politician who never held down a real job and can't put together a coherent sentence and advocates murdering all the unborn babies he possibly can is just mind boggling.

How you liking that this morning?
Still smiling?

 

[struth]

If Trump knows so much about classification, then that’s even worse because he can’t claim he didn’t know he was breaking the law. But if push actually does come to shove, Trump will probably claim ignorance as he did in his previous fraud cases.

Comey said a lot of things that he shouldn’t have.

DOJ watchdog slams Comey for claiming Clinton’s server could have been hacked

No public evidence has emerged to indicate that hackers compromised Clinton’s private server.

www.politico.com

he wasn’t breaking the law. There was no intent…remember? that’s the standard you all made for Obama Admin, when they keep top secret material on a third party server that was less secure then if they keep it on Google

Garland said a lot of things he shouldn’t have.

 

[Marener]

It was marked, it was classified at the time.

There were Top Secret material on Clinton's server. It was less secure then even having them on Google for goodness sake.

And you have no idea how the material Trump has was marked...nor that it was even still classified. He had the power to declassify anything at any time and any moment...Clinton did not.

Nope. It wasn’t properly marked and the presence of the c does not indicate it was classified at the time.

Nothing that was top secret was marked on Clinton’s server. It was classified after the fact.

Trump on the other hand:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/10/trump-records-classified/

Trump lost his power to declassify anything when he was booted from office. In order to declassify information, he had to go through the proper process which didn’t happen.

 

[Marener]

he wasn’t breaking the law. There was no intent…remember? that’s the standard you all made for Obama Admin, when they keep top secret material on a third party server that was less secure then if they keep it on Google

Garland said a lot of things he shouldn’t have.

It’s the proper standard. Tell me how boxing up top secret documents and flying them down to Florida wasn’t intentional? They didn’t just magically appear.

Garland is being criticized for not saying enough.