SCOTUS Shadow Docket Proves They Work For Trump

Oh look.....a MAGA dumb **** is making up his own reality again.....like all Nazis do.

Let me break it down for you, shit-for-brains......if Democrats were "lawless", then Trump would have been in ******* jail on Jan 7, 2021.
Keep crying, it's all you losers have left. How sad.
 
Because you are.

You lick the balls of a man who tried to kill his own Vice President.....how fucked up is that???

You are ******* sick in the head.
It seems like you probably need some professional help.
You obviously struggle with reality.
When you consult your therapist show him or her your deranged, unhinged posts.
That will be a good starting point. 🤪
 
So you have no proof of your wild accusations.
I gotta tell ya, I'm not surprised 🙄
Are ya stupid? I gave you a name, look it up.

There has been so much reporting on this I cannot believe this is the first you've heard of it, and I don't play "water is wet" for morons or liars.
 
Are ya stupid? I gave you a name, look it up.

There has been so much reporting on this I cannot believe this is the first you've heard of it, and I don't play "water is wet" for morons or liars.
You are implying that Supreme Court Justices have been taking bribes.
That is a major accusation.
You have provided zero proof or evidence.
You are a failure 😎
 
There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump

So when a national injunction was issued against a trump law or EO, the court intervened 70% of the time.

Those injunctions BTW were issued by judges appointed by both sides of the aisle.

And when a Biden law or EO was challenged?

0% intervention.

Not once.

And every injunction was issued by a right wing judge. Most of them in texas.

Some pretty clear bias showing here.
"Elections have consequences." - President Barack H. Obama, 2009 :auiqs.jpg:

------

Sucks when you've been voted out-of-power and SCOTUS leans towards the Other Guys and you can't stop it, doesn't it? :itsok:
 
You are implying that Supreme Court Justices have been taking bribes.
That is a major accusation.
You have provided zero proof or evidence.
You are a failure 😎
I'm not "implying" I'm stating.
 
"Elections have consequences." - President Barack H. Obama, 2009 :auiqs.jpg:

------

Sucks when you've been voted out-of-power and SCOTUS leans towards the Other Guys and you can't stop it, doesn't it? :itsok:
They don't "lean", they are bought and paid for.
 
Dude, there has been tons of reporting on it. Look up Harlan Crow for starters.
There has been plenty of reporting about Harlan Crow. The problem in all of that reporting is that those reports don't cite a single case where his gifts to Thomas had any effect on a decision made in the Supreme Court. If that's the standard, members of Congress, on both sides, would need to be kicked out of office. How many junkets do they take where political votes on matter in Congress is actually swayed by the rich and lobbyists?
 
What's the difference 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
You still have no proof. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄



There are literally dozens of links to your proof. It was all over the news for a while, until tRump threw out the next outrage to deflect it.
 
There has been plenty of reporting about Harlan Crow. The problem in all of that reporting is that those reports don't cite a single case where his gifts to Thomas had any effect on a decision made in the Supreme Court. If that's the standard, members of Congress, on both sides, would need to be kicked out of office. How many junkets do they take where political votes on matter in Congress is actually swayed by the rich and lobbyists?
642o5y.webp
 



There are literally dozens of links to your proof. It was all over the news for a while, until tRump threw out the next outrage to deflect it.
Name a single case that was affected by any of that.
 



There are literally dozens of links to your proof. It was all over the news for a while, until tRump threw out the next outrage to deflect it.
I read through your links and they appear to be extremely dubious with the authors incorporating they're own generally biased point of view.
You have to pay attention to words such as "likely" and "believed".
These words indicate heresay.
Also, I see no receipts.
Just because some writer says something doesn't mean anything.
If you want to accuse a Supreme Court Justice of taking bribes you should probably bring receipts.
Not a bunch of "likely" "believed" inuendo.
 
15th post
Just another ******* retarded NARRATIVE from the demented LEFT.
Do you idiots have any policy initiatives for the American People?


Didn't think so.

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom