SCOTUS Shadow Docket Proves They Work For Trump

[TemplarKormac]

YOu don't have to be a lawyer to see what they are doing.

You do, however, need to not be a GOP brainwashing victim.

One needs a good grasp of law and jurisprudence to know what they are doing, and I'd wager you don't, but I do. No, you don't need to be a lawyer, but you do need to educate yourself on the subject.

All you're doing is bitching and moaning.

 

[scruffy]

As previously mentioned, it's not winning if you cheat.

Go tell Joe Biden.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

YOu don't have to be a lawyer to see what they are doing.

You do, however, need to not be a GOP brainwashing victim.

You should be a better lawyer than Jackson, I’ll give you that.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump

So when a national injunction was issued against a trump law or EO, the court intervened 70% of the time.

Those injunctions BTW were issued by judges appointed by both sides of the aisle.

And when a Biden law or EO was challenged?

0% intervention.

Not once.

And every injunction was issued by a right wing judge. Most of them in texas.

Some pretty clear bias showing here.

Why do you make bald-faced lies like this?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The shadow docket should have been banned a long f****** time ago. The court should not be allowed to hear any case that has not been heard by a lower court. They should not be allowed to pick and choose specific things that they want to rule on that have not been brought them as part of an appeal.

Well, you are talking about some else's fantasy world. How does what you said have any bearing on reality?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No they are not and that is the issue. Originally the supreme Court could only hear a case if it was ruled on by a lower court. First they were not allowed to hear original cases or make rulings on matters that were not previously injuticated by a lower court. Except on very specific instances. The shadow docket allows them to basically bring up any case they want to, regardless of whether it's been heard by a lower court or not and make rulings on them without even hearing arguments. Basically it allows the majority on the court to bring up whatever they want and rule however they want without any oversight or transparency.

Where did you dream up that load of bullshit? Name a case! Put up or shut up!

 

[JanetTheGreat]

Sotomayor and Jackson are the worst justices in modern history. The rest of them, don't like them either other than Clarence Thomas, but those two are horrible!

 

[scruffy]

Why do you make bald-faced lies like this?

I had a thread locked for less.

And mine was backed up by multiple sources

 

[Leviticus]

Not sure where you are getting that. But they are called interlocutory appeals. An order is made by the lower court (adjudicated) which is appealed through the Circuit Court and up to the SC. It's not like the randomly pick issues out of the air

There are several things that have been added to the shadow docket without actually being brought before the court officially. The shadow docket was originally for emergency rulings on things that needed to be cleared up. But it has almost always been abused by the majority, whether the majority has been liberal or conservative, to add things to the courts docket that have not officially been brought to the court. And because the court alone dictates the shadow docket and does not have to publicly disclose it, they can pretty much get away with it whenever they want

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

When I see The Donald dancing to the gay anthem like that, it looks like he is masturbating two large penises to give himself a facial.

Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

^^^^^^^^^^
No TDS here.

 

[Modern Messiah]

The law is not supposed to be partial to Republicans or Democrats, Nazi ****.

That didn't take long.
#9 and your already calling people nazis

 

[Modern Messiah]

There was no lawfare, simp. Trump broke the law because he is a traitor. The End.

Nope.
It was lawfare

 

[Modern Messiah]

When I see The Donald dancing to the gay anthem like that, it looks like he is masturbating two large penises to give himself a facial.

Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

Maybe you should sit the next few rounds out and breathe into a paper bag.
You seem to be in a heightened state of derangement.

 

[Modern Messiah]

It's not winning when you cheat.

Who is cheating?
And how?

 

[Modern Messiah]

LMAO!!! They make most of their money by "interpreting" it the way they are told by the billionaires who pay them 100 times more than the government, that being "we the people" do.

Do you have proof of this?
That's a really heavy accusation.

 

[Modern Messiah]

They ruled again Joe Biden 100% of the time.

I guess what cornpop was doing was illegal then.

 

[1srelluc]

 

[Hollie]

There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump

So when a national injunction was issued against a trump law or EO, the court intervened 70% of the time.

Those injunctions BTW were issued by judges appointed by both sides of the aisle.

And when a Biden law or EO was challenged?

0% intervention.

Not once.

And every injunction was issued by a right wing judge. Most of them in texas.

Some pretty clear bias showing here.

“There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump”.

“….. because I cut and pasted an opinion I stole from the web”.

 

[Hollie]

There is an obvious double standard here.

And SCOTUS is not even trying to hide it.

It’s hilarious when morons cut and paste slogans they heard while binge watching The View.

 

[Rawley]

Dude, do you walk backwards and shit too?

WTF? The Court left more injunctions in place against Trump than they did against Biden. Your numbers, shiteater.