SCOTUS Shadow Docket Proves They Work For Trump

[Crepitus]

The Court does what it's paid to do and that's interpreting the Constitution.

LMAO!!! They make most of their money by "interpreting" it the way they are told by the billionaires who pay them 100 times more than the government, that being "we the people" do.

 

[Crepitus]

SO the Court left more injunctions in place against Trump than they did against Biden. And exactly how does that put them in Trump's pocket?

Dude, do you walk backwards and shit too?

 

[Crepitus]

Scotus has also ruled against trump on several occasions

They ruled again Joe Biden 100% of the time.

 

[Billiejeens]

There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump

So when a national injunction was issued against a trump law or EO, the court intervened 70% of the time.

Those injunctions BTW were issued by judges appointed by both sides of the aisle.

And when a Biden law or EO was challenged?

0% intervention.

Not once.

And every injunction was issued by a right wing judge. Most of them in texas.

Some pretty clear bias showing here.

Thank you SCOTUS.

 

[Billiejeens]

There is an obvious double standard here.

And SCOTUS is not even trying to hide it.

Good

 

[Crepitus]

Thank you SCOTUS.

Not them, folks like Halran Crow.

 

[WEATHER53]

Well one of your district judge chumps will have to order them to stop

 

[Crepitus]

Good

What an anti-American thing to say.

 

[Billiejeens]

What an anti-American thing to say.

Thank you.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not them, folks like Halran Crow.

Club for growth?

 

[TemplarKormac]

There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump

So when a national injunction was issued against a trump law or EO, the court intervened 70% of the time.

Those injunctions BTW were issued by judges appointed by both sides of the aisle.

And when a Biden law or EO was challenged?

0% intervention.

Not once.

And every injunction was issued by a right wing judge. Most of them in texas.

Some pretty clear bias showing here.

I'm sure I trust judges with a firm grasp on the law more than you. And the government these days has the wherewithal to file emergency appeals directly to SCOTUS. Biden didn't. Why? Because his handlers knew that what they were doing would be struck down at the Supreme Court.

Stop whining.

 

[TemplarKormac]

It's not winning when you cheat.

Your conspiracies are hilarious, man!

 

[Crepitus]

I'm sure I trust judges with a firm grasp on the law more than you. And the government these days has the wherewithal to file emergency appeals directly to SCOTUS. Biden didn't. Why? Because his handlers knew that what they were doing would be struck down at the Supreme Court.

Stop whining.

Pretty sure that disqualifies the SC(r)OTUS these days.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Pretty sure that disqualifies the SC(r)OTUS these days.

Of course, I'll defer to your vast judicial expertise, legal eagle.

 

[Crepitus]

Of course, I'll defer to your vast judicial expertise, legal eagle.

YOu don't have to be a lawyer to see what they are doing.

You do, however, need to not be a GOP brainwashing victim.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

There’s no longer any doubt that the country’s highest court favors trump

So when a national injunction was issued against a trump law or EO, the court intervened 70% of the time.

Those injunctions BTW were issued by judges appointed by both sides of the aisle.

And when a Biden law or EO was challenged?

0% intervention.

Not once.

And every injunction was issued by a right wing judge. Most of them in texas.

Some pretty clear bias showing here.

That’s called winning.

 

[blackhawk]

If the Supreme Court was a 6 six liberal three conservative and it was ruling overwhelming in favor of the Democrats all the lefties would be praising, it and to be fair the righties would be trashing it outrage of convivence is no outrage at all. This bitching about the Court from the left is we are not getting our way, so we are going to throw the adult version of two-year-old temper tantrum.

 

[Crepitus]

That’s called winning.

As previously mentioned, it's not winning if you cheat.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

They ruled again Joe Biden 100% of the time.

Makes sense due to him doing the wrong thing 100% of the time.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

As previously mentioned, it's not winning if you cheat.

Where is the cheating happening?