Scott Brown Backs Obama Recess Appointment Of Consumer Finance Watchdog

[Sarah G]

It's going to take a lot more than this to save Scott Brown.

I hope it's a last ditch effort by Brown. I sort of liked him at times but he was never a consistent vote, he even connected with the teaparty during his campaign. We have enough of those on our side already.

Elizabeth makes sense consistently. It's your state but I'm rooting for her.

 

[editec]

So it doesnt bother you at all that he made a recess appointment when there hasnt been a recess?!

He is that corrupt. and that doesnt bother you?

No. The Congress is corrupt.

Except for Bernie Sanders.

I wouldn't go quite that far, but your POV has merit.

 

[The Rabbi]

So Scott Brown's reasoning is he wants to get past partisan bickering and get the country moving. And the Left's reaction? Go Elizabeth.
Shows you the Left is just a bunch of partisan bastards interested in power for its own sake. It wouldn't matter what Brown said, they'd find some reason to oppose him.
Warren is an ugly underqualifed socialist hag. Who'd vote for her?

 

[Article 15]

So Scott Brown's reasoning is he wants to get past partisan bickering and get the country moving. And the Left's reaction? Go Elizabeth.
Shows you the Left is just a bunch of partisan bastards interested in power for its own sake. It wouldn't matter what Brown said, they'd find some reason to oppose him.
Warren is an ugly underqualifed socialist hag. Who'd vote for her?

Me and about 55% of people who will cast a vote in November.

Scott Brown can run against Lurch or run for governor in couple of years and I will gladly vote for him but not if he is running against my sweet Miss Elizabeth.

 

[The Rabbi]

So Scott Brown's reasoning is he wants to get past partisan bickering and get the country moving. And the Left's reaction? Go Elizabeth.
Shows you the Left is just a bunch of partisan bastards interested in power for its own sake. It wouldn't matter what Brown said, they'd find some reason to oppose him.
Warren is an ugly underqualifed socialist hag. Who'd vote for her?

Me and about 55% of people who will cast a vote in November.

Scott Brown can run against Lurch or run for governor in couple of years and I will gladly vote for him but not if he is running against my sweet Miss Elizabeth.

You go for the socialist hags with no experience? What a shock.

But we're talking about a state that elected the corrupt Ted Kennedy multiple times, and returned the ****** Barney Frank to Congress over and over, despite his criminal actitivty. SO anything is possible.

 

[Article 15]

So Scott Brown's reasoning is he wants to get past partisan bickering and get the country moving. And the Left's reaction? Go Elizabeth.
Shows you the Left is just a bunch of partisan bastards interested in power for its own sake. It wouldn't matter what Brown said, they'd find some reason to oppose him.
Warren is an ugly underqualifed socialist hag. Who'd vote for her?

Me and about 55% of people who will cast a vote in November.

Scott Brown can run against Lurch or run for governor in couple of years and I will gladly vote for him but not if he is running against my sweet Miss Elizabeth.

You go for the socialist hags with no experience? What a shock.

But we're talking about a state that elected the corrupt Ted Kennedy multiple times, and returned the ****** Barney Frank to Congress over and over, despite his criminal actitivty. SO anything is possible.

Clearly, your real issue is that you are afraid of a strong liberal woman.

 

[J.E.D]

Brown is only trying to sound reasonable because of Elizabeth Warren. Go Elizabeth!!!!!

Exactly. I don't think the voters of MA are going to fall for it. His record speaks for itself. It wasn't that long ago that he said the opposite.

link?

Senators: Run consumer head by us - Meredith Shiner - POLITICO.com

Sens. Scott Brown of Massachusetts and Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine "strongly [urged]" the President not to bypass the Senate, but to "follow regular order" in naming the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, according to the letter obtained by POLITICO.

"While we may have different views of the need for this new agency, as supporters of the legislation that included it, we firmly believe the United States Senate’s responsibilities in confirming the head of the CFPB are paramount," the senators wrote, citing they were "deeply disappointed" by previous recess appointments made by the president in recent weeks.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So it doesnt bother you at all that he made a recess appointment when there hasnt been a recess?!

He is that corrupt. and that doesnt bother you?

It doesn't bother you that the Senate is pretending to be in session?

 

[NYcarbineer]

So it doesnt bother you at all that he made a recess appointment when there hasnt been a recess?!

He is that corrupt. and that doesnt bother you?

Our President is not corrupt. What he is finally doing is making the GOP answer for the obstruction of all of the business of this nation. Good for him. And I wish that he would make a recess appointment of every judge that the GOP has blocked since the President took office.

Actually, President Clueless is about to burden us with one more expensive government agency that will make it harder to do business here in the US and will be one more reason companies go elsewhere. Then all of "you" will scratch your heads and wonder why businesses STILL aren't hiring people. Duh?

"The central mission of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is to make markets for consumer financial products and services work for Americans—whether they are applying for a mortgage, choosing among credit cards, or using any number of other consumer financial products." The jurisdiction of the bureau includes banks, credit unions, securities firms, payday lenders, mortgage-servicing operations, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors and other financial companies, and its most pressing concerns are mortgages, credit cards and student loans, according to incoming enforcement chief, Richard Cordray."

How are those companies going to 'go elsewhere'?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

From what I have seen of Scott Brown, he may actually mean what he says. But Elizabeth Warren is the better person for the job. Nice to see a race where both candidates are sane, however.

I applaud the Warren candidacy. It's about time the Democrats stopped pretending to be moderates and started running real radicals and Neo-Marxists

 

[Katzndogz]

It doesn't do any good to point out that obama has become a dictator. The left WANTS a dictator. They want more of the same. If obama confiscated the banks, went house to house looking for expensive assets to confiscate and started mass arrests of republicans, liberals would be cheering in the streets. Il Duche! Il Duche! Mussolini might have been a cruel and despotic dictator, but he made the trains run on time.

 

[Sallow]

Brown is only trying to sound reasonable because of Elizabeth Warren. Go Elizabeth!!!!!

Some damn good pandering..I tell you what.

Next up..Brown endores Obama.

 

[Sallow]

Our President is not corrupt. What he is finally doing is making the GOP answer for the obstruction of all of the business of this nation. Good for him. And I wish that he would make a recess appointment of every judge that the GOP has blocked since the President took office.

Actually, President Clueless is about to burden us with one more expensive government agency that will make it harder to do business here in the US and will be one more reason companies go elsewhere. Then all of "you" will scratch your heads and wonder why businesses STILL aren't hiring people. Duh?

We have had 21 straight months of private sector job growth.

Why do you lie?

And a decline in government jobs. Which makes UE look really bad. Now why are all these government workers getting the boot?

Oh yeah..Republicans!

 

[Sallow]

It doesn't do any good to point out that obama has become a dictator. The left WANTS a dictator. They want more of the same. If obama confiscated the banks, went house to house looking for expensive assets to confiscate and started mass arrests of republicans, liberals would be cheering in the streets. Il Duche! Il Duche! Mussolini might have been a cruel and despotic dictator, but he made the trains run on time.

Which is interesting coming from a conservative. The last president lost the popular vote in his first election. But still became president!

 

[Full-Auto]

Actually, President Clueless is about to burden us with one more expensive government agency that will make it harder to do business here in the US and will be one more reason companies go elsewhere. Then all of "you" will scratch your heads and wonder why businesses STILL aren't hiring people. Duh?

We have had 21 straight months of private sector job growth.

Why do you lie?

And a decline in government jobs. Which makes UE look really bad. Now why are all these government workers getting the boot?

Oh yeah..Republicans!

 

[Sallow]

We have had 21 straight months of private sector job growth.

Why do you lie?

And a decline in government jobs. Which makes UE look really bad. Now why are all these government workers getting the boot?

Oh yeah..Republicans!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-A09a_gHJc]Mitch McConnell: Top Priority, Make Obama a One Term President - YouTube[/ame]

Good job boys!

 

[Full-Auto]

And a decline in government jobs. Which makes UE look really bad. Now why are all these government workers getting the boot?

Oh yeah..Republicans!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-A09a_gHJc]Mitch McConnell: Top Priority, Make Obama a One Term President - YouTube[/ame]

Good job boys!

The point? You can at least manage that? You have failed every where else.

 

[Sallow]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-A09a_gHJc]Mitch McConnell: Top Priority, Make Obama a One Term President - YouTube[/ame]

Good job boys!

The point? You can at least manage that? You have failed every where else.

What? You're not going to bring up Keystone?

For shame..for shame.

 

[Full-Auto]

Mitch McConnell: Top Priority, Make Obama a One Term President - YouTube

Good job boys!

The point? You can at least manage that? You have failed every where else.

What? You're not going to bring up Keystone?

For shame..for shame.

This isnt the twilight zone.

 

[Conservative]

Our President is not corrupt. What he is finally doing is making the GOP answer for the obstruction of all of the business of this nation. Good for him. And I wish that he would make a recess appointment of every judge that the GOP has blocked since the President took office.

Actually, President Clueless is about to burden us with one more expensive government agency that will make it harder to do business here in the US and will be one more reason companies go elsewhere. Then all of "you" will scratch your heads and wonder why businesses STILL aren't hiring people. Duh?

We have had 21 straight months of private sector job growth.

Why do you lie?

Unemployment Rate Drops To 8.6% But Job Growth Remains Weak

Long-term unemployment remains a big problem: The average duration for joblessness surged to a record-high 40.9 weeks. Stagnation in wages also continues, as more employed workers took on second jobs.

Additionally, the drop in the unemployment rate is largely attributable to the fact that some 310,000 people simply stopped looking for work and therefore are no longer counted as unemployment. The Labor Force participation rate fell from 64.2% to 64.0%, if that figure were at the same level it was at the time President Obama took office, the current unemployment rate would be 11%. So, while the press, the Administration, and many Americans are likely to focus on the topline unemployment number, there’s really nothing encouraging about this report beyond the fact that it’s always good when more people are working. Even Matthew Yglesias acknowledged that on Twitter this morning, when he noted that lowering unemployment by decreasing labor force participation is “not exactly winning the future.”