Scientist discovers errors in global warming model

[jc456]

Another one who thinks the debate is over.. And you would be wrong..

Science is NOT subjective.......The debate is LONG over...

Some right wingers would argue about the existence of gravity if Sean Hannity tells them to.

From Albert Einstein:

"Even Albert agrees:
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.
Albert Einstein"

 

[paulitician]

I'm just waiting for the Globalist idiots to start pushing a 'Global Cooling' scam. Because i assure you, that is coming next. But see, at least Global Cooling is a real threat to humanity. There is no evidence showing Global Warming ends life on Earth. In fact, in the warmest temperatures ever recorded, life actually thrived on the Planet. It was incredibly diverse and abundant. More so than today.

However, when it turns cold, life struggles to survive. Not much survives Ice Ages. So at least Global Cooling would be somewhat of a concern. But again, no need to panic. You're gonna die of anything but Global Warming and Global Cooling. So just live and enjoy your short time here. Peace.

Been there done that: 1974 the leftards were pushing we were headed into another ice age unless we acted now. Maybe we overreacted?
Another Ice Age?

Awww, it's that cute global cooling myth again that was debunked last decade.

An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Check your smart-watch. This interglacial is already longer than 2 of the previous three.. Time's a'wasting.
Good news is -- spewing A LOT of CO2 might just help a few people in the higher latitudes survive the next glacial period..

Animal and plant life have always thrived during times of high CO2 levels and warm climates. Lush tropical climates are perfect for life. It's only when climates turn cold & dry, that life struggles to survive. 'Global Warming' will not spell the end of humanity. In fact, humanity will likely thrive.

 

[jc456]

Been there done that: 1974 the leftards were pushing we were headed into another ice age unless we acted now. Maybe we overreacted?
Another Ice Age?

Awww, it's that cute global cooling myth again that was debunked last decade.

An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Bring on the warmth. I can handle it. I ain't afraid of no Global Warming Boogeyman.

Until it starts killing too many people, then....

until what does that? Let's see some evidence of something you fear here.

 

[paulitician]

Been there done that: 1974 the leftards were pushing we were headed into another ice age unless we acted now. Maybe we overreacted?
Another Ice Age?

Awww, it's that cute global cooling myth again that was debunked last decade.

An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Bring on the warmth. I can handle it. I ain't afraid of no Global Warming Boogeyman.

Until it starts killing too many people, then....

People die all the time. That's never gonna change. But the historical climate evidence shows that animal and plant life thrive during times of high CO2 levels and warm climates. So humanity isn't doomed.

Now, extreme cold climates are another story. Animal and plant life don't do very well in those climates. So, when the 'Global Cooling' fear mongering begins, it would be somewhat reasonable to be concerned. Humans don't like harsh cold climates.

 

[jc456]

Awww, it's that cute global cooling myth again that was debunked last decade.

An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Bring on the warmth. I can handle it. I ain't afraid of no Global Warming Boogeyman.

Until it starts killing too many people, then....

People die all the time. That's never gonna change. But the historical climate evidence shows that animal and plant life thrive during times of high CO2 levels and warm climates. So humanity isn't doomed.

Now, extreme cold climates are another story. Animal and plant life don't do very well in those climates. So, when the 'Global Cooling' fear mongering begins, it would be somewhat reasonable to be concerned. Humans don't like harsh cold climates.

well perhaps the dude could actually post up some evidence of global warming deaths. But those facts are not in evidence, because............there is none.

 

[paulitician]

Awww, it's that cute global cooling myth again that was debunked last decade.

An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Bring on the warmth. I can handle it. I ain't afraid of no Global Warming Boogeyman.

Until it starts killing too many people, then....

until what does that? Let's see some evidence of something you fear here.

It's fear. Humans seem to enjoy being afraid.

 

[jc456]

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Bring on the warmth. I can handle it. I ain't afraid of no Global Warming Boogeyman.

Until it starts killing too many people, then....

until what does that? Let's see some evidence of something you fear here.

It's fear. Humans seem to enjoy being afraid.

socialists I guess.

 

[paulitician]

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Bring on the warmth. I can handle it. I ain't afraid of no Global Warming Boogeyman.

Until it starts killing too many people, then....

People die all the time. That's never gonna change. But the historical climate evidence shows that animal and plant life thrive during times of high CO2 levels and warm climates. So humanity isn't doomed.

Now, extreme cold climates are another story. Animal and plant life don't do very well in those climates. So, when the 'Global Cooling' fear mongering begins, it would be somewhat reasonable to be concerned. Humans don't like harsh cold climates.

well perhaps the dude could actually post up some evidence of global warming deaths. But those facts are not in evidence, because............there is none.

The historical climate evidence doesn't support the belief that high CO2 levels and warm climates spell the end for life. In fact, it supports the exact opposite.

 

[nat4900]

You moronic right wingers actually thrive on belittling science.....There is NO argument amount our changing weather patterns; you'd rather believe some lone dissenter than the 99% of scientists who have and will continue to warn us of the impending dangers......Sure, your sorry asses won't be around to see the devastation, but your great grand kids will....and will curse your souls for it.

The turmoil in many parts of Africa AND the civil war in Syria initially began because of global warming.....

If the impending devastation were to happen tomorrow (which won't happen), you morons would be the first claiming that you did NOT EVER doubt that it would happen. Such is the nature of morons.

 

[paulitician]

Awww, it's that cute global cooling myth again that was debunked last decade.

An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Actually, many currently believe the earth is about to enter a cooling cycle. But regardless, Global Warming/Global Cooling? We'll survive... Or we won't.

No not really. Most believe we have just started the interglacial period which will last for thousands of years.

Adapt or die.

Check your smart-watch. This interglacial is already longer than 2 of the previous three.. Time's a'wasting.
Good news is -- spewing A LOT of CO2 might just help a few people in the higher latitudes survive the next glacial period..

View attachment 52605

View attachment 52608
Dag Namit... Westwall is right...!!! AGAIN!

Oh look! more stupid graphs.

you're not a climate scientist. you're an anonymous loser on a web based message board

Ha, and you're not?

 

[paulitician]

You moronic right wingers actually thrive on belittling science.....There is NO argument amount our changing weather patterns; you'd rather believe some lone dissenter than the 99% of scientists who have and will continue to warn us of the impending dangers......Sure, your sorry asses won't be around to see the devastation, but your great grand kids will....and will curse your souls for it.

The turmoil in many parts of Africa AND the civil war in Syria initially began because of global warming.....

If the impending devastation were to happen tomorrow (which won't happen), you morons would be the first claiming that you did NOT EVER doubt that it would happen. Such is the nature of morons.

High CO2 levels and warm climates are actually ideal for animal and plant life. The historical climate record shows that. We'll survive some warming. Seriously, we will.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You moronic right wingers actually thrive on belittling science.....There is NO argument amount our changing weather patterns; you'd rather believe some lone dissenter than the 99% of scientists who have and will continue to warn us of the impending dangers......Sure, your sorry asses won't be around to see the devastation, but your great grand kids will....and will curse your souls for it.

The turmoil in many parts of Africa AND the civil war in Syria initially began because of global warming.....

If the impending devastation were to happen tomorrow (which won't happen), you morons would be the first claiming that you did NOT EVER doubt that it would happen. Such is the nature of morons.

Yeah, never was violence in the Middle East or Africa until Gorebal Warming.
Ignorant moron.

 

[paulitician]

Most humans seem to enjoy living in fear of their imagined Doomsday scenarios. Whether it's religious zealots, zombie apocalypse zealots, or Global Warming zealots. They all have that in common. And usually there's an agenda behind what they're pushing as well.

The reality is, the Global Warming Boogeyman ain't gonna get you. You're much more likely to die of cancer or get hit by a bus. But one thing's for sure, you're gonna die. Just accept that and quit living in fear of Boogeymen. Live life to the fullest. You're not gonna be here long. Don't waste another day living in fear.

 

[nat4900]

Yeah, never was violence in the Middle East or Africa until Gorebal Warming.
Ignorant moron.

NO, idiot......I'm not referring to the violence as much as I am referring to the MASS MIGRATIONS...
(is there a grown up in your basement to help you understand?)

 

[paulitician]

Yeah, never was violence in the Middle East or Africa until Gorebal Warming.
Ignorant moron.

NO, idiot......I'm not referring to the violence as much as I am referring to the MASS MIGRATIONS...
(is there a grown up in your basement to help you understand?)

Are you suggesting 'Global Warming' is the reason people are choosing to flee the Middle East? I'm not following.

 

[nat4900]

Are you suggesting 'Global Warming' is the reason people are choosing to leave he Middle East? I'm not following.

[The} drought — combined with the mismanagement of natural resources by [Syrian President Bashar] Assad, who subsidized water-intensive crops like wheat and cotton farming and promoted bad irrigation techniques — led to significant devastation. According to updated numbers, the drought displaced 1.5 million people within Syria..........a massive internal migration was happening, mainly on the periphery, from farmers and herders who had lost their livelihoods completely. Around 75 percent of farmers suffered total crop failure, so they moved into the cities. Farmers in the northeast lost 80 percent of their livestock, so they had to leave and find livelihoods elsewhere. They all moved into urban areas — urban areas that were already experiencing economic insecurity due to an influx of Iraqi and Palestinian refugees. But this massive displacement mostly wasn't reported. So it wasn't factoring into various security analyses.
Drought helped cause Syria’s war. Will climate change bring more like it?

Even as Europe wrestles over how to absorb the migrant tide, experts warn that the flood is likely to get worse as climate change becomes a driving factor.
How Climate Change is Behind the Surge of Migrants to Europe

Drawing one of the strongest links yet between global warming and human conflict, researchers said Monday that an extreme drought in Syria between 2006 and 2009 was most likely due to climate change, and that the drought was a factor in the violent uprising that began there in 2011.

The drought was the worst in the country in modern times, and in a study published Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists laid the blame for it on a century-long trend toward warmer and drier conditions in the Eastern Mediterranean, rather than on natural climate variability...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/s...o-drought-caused-by-climate-change.html?_r=0#

 

[paulitician]

Are you suggesting 'Global Warming' is the reason people are choosing to leave he Middle East? I'm not following.

[The} drought — combined with the mismanagement of natural resources by [Syrian President Bashar] Assad, who subsidized water-intensive crops like wheat and cotton farming and promoted bad irrigation techniques — led to significant devastation. According to updated numbers, the drought displaced 1.5 million people within Syria..........a massive internal migration was happening, mainly on the periphery, from farmers and herders who had lost their livelihoods completely. Around 75 percent of farmers suffered total crop failure, so they moved into the cities. Farmers in the northeast lost 80 percent of their livestock, so they had to leave and find livelihoods elsewhere. They all moved into urban areas — urban areas that were already experiencing economic insecurity due to an influx of Iraqi and Palestinian refugees. But this massive displacement mostly wasn't reported. So it wasn't factoring into various security analyses.
Drought helped cause Syria’s war. Will climate change bring more like it?

Even as Europe wrestles over how to absorb the migrant tide, experts warn that the flood is likely to get worse as climate change becomes a driving factor.
How Climate Change is Behind the Surge of Migrants to Europe

Drawing one of the strongest links yet between global warming and human conflict, researchers said Monday that an extreme drought in Syria between 2006 and 2009 was most likely due to climate change, and that the drought was a factor in the violent uprising that began there in 2011.

The drought was the worst in the country in modern times, and in a study published Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists laid the blame for it on a century-long trend toward warmer and drier conditions in the Eastern Mediterranean, rather than on natural climate variability...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/s...o-drought-caused-by-climate-change.html?_r=0#

No offense, but that's a bizarre stretch at best. And there's no real scientific evidence showing 'Global Warming' has caused any droughts. Some are pushing that claim, but there's no real scientific proof to back it. Droughts have existed on earth forever, during periods of warming and cooling.

 

[IanC]

Most humans seem to enjoy living in fear of their imagined Doomsday scenarios. Whether it's religious zealots, zombie apocalypse zealots, or Global Warming zealots. They all have that in common. And usually there's an agenda behind what they're pushing as well.

The reality is, the Global Warming Boogeyman ain't gonna get you. You're much more likely to die of cancer or get hit by a bus. But one thing's for sure, you're gonna die. Just accept that and quit living in fear of Boogeymen. Live life to the fullest. You're not gonna be here long. Don't waste another day living in fear.

people would prefer to think themselves important, even in a negative connotation, rather than be insignificant. global warming gives them the chance to be important again, with opportunities to repent and sacrifice, and so receive the blessings of the tribe.

this of course goes against the grain of science, which has been putting mankind further and further away from the centre of the universe for a very long time.

 

[paulitician]

Most humans seem to enjoy living in fear of their imagined Doomsday scenarios. Whether it's religious zealots, zombie apocalypse zealots, or Global Warming zealots. They all have that in common. And usually there's an agenda behind what they're pushing as well.

The reality is, the Global Warming Boogeyman ain't gonna get you. You're much more likely to die of cancer or get hit by a bus. But one thing's for sure, you're gonna die. Just accept that and quit living in fear of Boogeymen. Live life to the fullest. You're not gonna be here long. Don't waste another day living in fear.

people would prefer to think themselves important, even in a negative connotation, rather than be insignificant. global warming gives them the chance to be important again, with opportunities to repent and sacrifice, and so receive the blessings of the tribe.

this of course goes against the grain of science, which has been putting mankind further and further away from the centre of the universe for a very long time.

Well said. Wise observation.

 

[nat4900]

Well, my right wing friends, I'd guess that for you, denial is the best coping mechanism.

Based MORE on politics, you're willing to defy 99% of the scientific world-wide community, than to accept the fact that your opposite party is raising the alarm.