Sure................Duh...
He was a gay Kenyan coke whore community HATE HOAX organizer BEFORE she ran for Senate and called Michelle "Michael" twice on camera....
Jr. is coming back, I promise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure................Duh...
He was a gay Kenyan coke whore community HATE HOAX organizer BEFORE she ran for Senate and called Michelle "Michael" twice on camera....
Take the tornado question. It's really a poor question because first off, the Fujita scale we use today was only developed in the late 1970's. There is evidence prior to this, tornado's were reported as stronger than they actually were.You mean like this one?
Among questions in which the wrong answers accorded with partisan agendas, an average of 57% of answers were liberally misinformed, while 28% were conservatively misinformed. In other words, voters were twice as likely to believe certain progressive myths than conservative ones.
Any question can be questioned. I assume they based their questions on mainstream knowledge.Take the tornado question. It's really a poor question because first off, the Fujita scale we use today was only developed in the late 1970's. There is evidence prior to this, tornado's were reported as stronger than they actually were.
Tornadoes and climate change – Markowski Research Group
"That said, the U.S. historical tornado record has grave limitations that make its use for establishing tornado trends dubious. The record is derived solely from unsolicited eyewitness reports and post-event damage surveys, both of which suffer from representativeness errors and other unnatural biases."
Article shows what we already know. That liberals are generally way more misinformed than the right.
![]()
Scientific Survey Shows Voters Across the Political Spectrum Are Ideologically Deluded – Just Facts
A cutting-edge scientific survey shows that the vast bulk of voters have embraced false and harmful dogmas that accord with their political views.www.justfacts.com
no, it is not what the people wantEven facts can be mis-perceived and misinterpreted. Every time one of the leftists here makes a list of all of Trump's atrocities, every one of them is bogus. It is either factually incorrect or a wildly distorted interpretation of a harmless reality.
My most frightening thought is that the elections of Joe Biden and John Fetterman were not flukes. That's what the people really want. It makes me glad that I'm 73 years old and don't pay much in taxes. Otherwise it would drive me crazy.
Leftists still thunk that walls don't work![]()
Lol. No site is 100% non partisan. It is common practice to demonize any source that does not put you in a good light.4
In my mind, you are proving my link right.And that is complete bullshit. Figures never lie, but liars often figure. That site is in no way non partisan.
I read your article and it's interesting how these figures are being manipulated to show the conservative media in a much better light than they deserve.
Any question can be questioned. I assume they based their questions on mainstream knowledge.
What is the bias of “media bias fact-check”?The article is completely one sided and biased, which is typical of this website.
![]()
Just Facts – Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded wordsmediabiasfactcheck.com
"In conclusion, while it is true that all the facts listed on JF are validated or peer-reviewed in some way, JF does not attempt to report a balanced view of the totality of information, they do not include information that disagrees with their preferred conclusions, and they present facts (especially time series) selectively in such a way that those very facts seem to support the opposite of what the full data really support. Based on not presenting research and facts from both sides, we score this 6/10. Our last criteria are political affiliation which looks at a combination of ownership, funding, and the general tone of the information. We rate Just Facts 6/10 right for political affiliation based on ownership bias and demonstrated bias on the sister site. When added up, this website scores 3.5 Right, which falls within the Right-Center category."
What is the bias of “media bias fact-check”?
He never became osama you drooling idiotSo if you believe Michelle Obama is a man, what does that "scientific survey" say?
What if you think these photos show Jimmy Carter's NSA Zbigniew talking to Col Tim Osman CIA Asset before he became "Osama?"
![]()
![]()
Who fact checks the fact checkers? They made opinions in their summations.. how do we ensure those aren’t biased?Their bias is the reliability and honesty in the media.
You mean like this one?
Among questions in which the wrong answers accorded with partisan agendas, an average of 57% of answers were liberally misinformed, while 28% were conservatively misinformed. In other words, voters were twice as likely to believe certain progressive myths than conservative ones.
So I found a media fact check site that doesn't agree with yours. Now what?The article is completely one sided and biased, which is typical of this website.
![]()
Just Facts – Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded wordsmediabiasfactcheck.com
"In conclusion, while it is true that all the facts listed on JF are validated or peer-reviewed in some way, JF does not attempt to report a balanced view of the totality of information, they do not include information that disagrees with their preferred conclusions, and they present facts (especially time series) selectively in such a way that those very facts seem to support the opposite of what the full data really support. Based on not presenting research and facts from both sides, we score this 6/10. Our last criteria are political affiliation which looks at a combination of ownership, funding, and the general tone of the information. We rate Just Facts 6/10 right for political affiliation based on ownership bias and demonstrated bias on the sister site. When added up, this website scores 3.5 Right, which falls within the Right-Center category."