I Worked for Democrats for Years. Billionaires Have Unfettered Influence | Opinion

How about you wise up and realize Democrats lie to you.

Just kidding! That'll never happen.

Even the left-wing New York Times said the bill is crap.
Paywalled, but right on top it says guest opinion - do you know what those words mean?

Assuming you’ve actually read it - where does it say that the bill would not IMPROVE situation at the border?
 
Paywalled, but right on top it says guest opinion - do you know what those words mean?

Assuming you’ve actually read it - where does it say that the bill would not IMPROVE situation at the border?
The nation already spends more money on border policing than at any other point in its history. In the last two decades, Customs and Border Protection’s budget has almost tripled and Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s budget has doubled. Today, the Department of Homeland Security pays for over 19,000 Border Patrol agents, a similar number of ICE officers and expensive contracts with private companies that quickly sift through enormous amounts of data. And yet, border encounters in December set record highs.

These measures, if enacted, will do little to improve how the United States manages migration, nor will it stop migrants from coming. If more money could keep people from crossing our borders, we would have paid for the solution years ago.
The bill, which President Biden supports, would set aside nearly $4 billion for Customs and Border Protection, the Homeland Security division that includes Border Patrol, to prepare for a “migration surge” by hiring new staff members, reimbursing the Defense Department for its help and paying for Border Patrol agents’ overtime.

In addition, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which runs the government’s network of immigration prisons, would get over $7 billion to increase the number of people it can detain and deport, hire more staff members and track more migrants through electronic monitoring systems.

Democrats, who have consistently pushed for more options for migrants to enter the United States legally, can point to expanded opportunities that the legislation would provide: 32,000 green cards for people with close relatives who are already here legally and 18,000 more work visas for people with high-demand skills during each of the next five years. The bill wouldn’t touch the federal government’s parole authority, a flexible legal power that goes back decades. Unhappy with the Biden administration’s use of parole, Republicans had hoped to limit the discretion immigration officials have to use it.
 
The nation already spends more money on border policing than at any other point in its history. In the last two decades, Customs and Border Protection’s budget has almost tripled and Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s budget has doubled.

Dummy, thats because border was never secured and we've have had more people than ever trying to get in after covid.

Bill would provide more border agents to aprehend and immedeately deport illegals if the border gets too hot. Bill would also vastly increase adjudication capacity to deal with backlog of asylum aplicants and deport more of them straight from detention.

Funny how you write copy-and-paste all those words but can't address the meat of the bill.
 
Last edited:
In addition, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which runs the government’s network of immigration prisons, would get over $7 billion to increase the number of people it can detain and deport, hire more staff members and track more migrants through electronic monitoring systems.

Yes it would, which is yet another reason your dumbass should've been supporting the bill.

Maybe you should actually READ what you copy and paste.
 
Dummy, thats because border was never secured and we've have had more people than ever trying to get in after covid.

Bill would provide more border agents to aprehend and immedeately deport illegals if the border gets too hot. Bill would also vastly increase adjudication capacity to deal with backlog of asylum aplicants and deport more of them straight from detention.

Funny how you write copy-and-paste all those words but can't address the meat of the bill.
What's the point? You'd just screech NUH UH, spit out some garbage, and pretend you won the internet.
 
What's the point? You'd just screech NUH UH, spit out some garbage, and pretend you won the internet.
The point is the bill DEPORTS MORE ILLEGALS, which is what you rightwingers keep saying you wanted. Duh

It's a very simple to understand concept...unless you are a mindfucked Trumptard who has no brain of his own.
 
Yes it would, which is yet another reason your dumbass should've been supporting the bill.

Maybe you should actually READ what you copy and paste.
Have you read it? Let's see what someone who has read it has to say about it.

Under the proposed legislation, the president’s authority to shut down the border “may” be exercised if the 7-day average of border encounters exceeds 4,000 per day and “shall” be exercised if the 7-day average is above 5,000 per day. But the legislation explicitly states that this authority shall not be activated “during the first calendar year after the effective date, for more than 270 calendar days; during the second calendar year … for more than 225 days; and during the third calendar year, for more than 180 calendar days.”

And, as the chief Democratic negotiator, Sen. Chris Murphy (Conn.) explained, “even during these emergency times, the border never fully closes. The President is just better able to manage the border by moving asylum claim processing to the land ports.” That’s because the law mandates the continued processing of “a minimum of 1,400 inadmissible aliens each calendar day cumulatively across all southwest land border ports of entry.”

As former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy points out, if this legislation were to be enacted “it could be argued (and progressive judges appointed by [President] Biden would surely rule) that this new law superseded the old” — and that henceforth the president cannot shut down the border unless the 4,000 threshold is reached, and then for just three years, and for a limited, declining number of days each year — and that he cannot shut down processing at land ports.

In other words, by “authorizing” powers the president already has with new conditions, the legislation is not really “authorizing” anything — it is simply placing restrictions on the president’s existing authority.

So, this bill is not better than nothing; it is worse than nothing. In the name of forcing the hand of a sitting president who is not serious about securing the border, it would tie the hands of a future president who is serious about securing the border.

And that is only the beginning of the problems with this legislation. For example, the bill authorizes funding for an additional 16,000 immigrant detention beds, up from the current 34,000. But Biden is not filling thousands of existing detention beds, which are sitting empty in facilities across the country. The problem is not a lack of detention beds, it is the lack of presidential will to detain illegal migrants.

The bill would also provide $1.4 billion to nongovernmental organizations and municipalities struggling to handle the influx of migrants to pay “sheltering and related activities.” This would lift the pressure Republican governors such as Texas’s Greg Abbott have put on Democratic leaders of self-proclaimed “sanctuary cities” such as New York and Chicago. And it would provide federal funding to pay for housing, food and other support for migrants who entered this country illegally. Why would Republicans agree to that, when they believe these migrants should be deported? Let sanctuary cities bear the burden of providing sanctuary.

The question here is, why does your dumbass support this stupid legislation?
 
Have you read it?

I'm quoting your own copy-and-paste of the article...and you are asking me if I've read it?

Yes I obviously read the post I've quoted dumbass and it clearly says ICE would get billions to detain, deport and track illegals. Which part of that did you not get?
 
I'm quoting your own copy-and-paste of the article...and you are asking me if I've read it?

Yes I obviously read it dumbass and clearly says ICE would get billions to detain, deport and track illegals. Which part of that did you not get?
The part where ICE would actually deport illegals.

But the whole thing is absurd. If Border Czar Harris had actually closed the border, there'd be no need to increase staffing to handle the rush of illegals Border Czar Harris purposely let in.

What little of her campaign isn't ORANGE MAN BAD is her promising to fix the problems she herself has contributed to.

And idiots like you fall for it.
 
The part where ICE would actually deport illegals.

So then you disagree with the very article you are quoting.

Want to go google some more articles because you can't stand to admit that Trump obviously sunk a bipartisan Deport More bill so he could have something to run on?

I honestly feel bad for you all you mindfucked Trumptards, twisting yourself into pretzels like this must take a toll.
 
During the summer of 2020, I worked as a consultant for multiple progressive DA candidates backed by George Soros and his foundation. In the places where they won, these DAs have since done immeasurable damage to the local communities. They failed to prosecute offenders, especially surrounding drug use and distribution, and allowed crime to run rampant, hurting communities of color the most—the very people they were supposedly trying to help.

Far from progressive, these Soros-backed DAs did more to hurt progressives than anything the Right has managed; to everyday Americans, the term "progressive" now conjures up images of fentanyl overdoses, crime, defecation in the streets, and riots.

I feel remorse for the work I did on these campaigns. The Soros money that was contributed to progressive DA races would have been better spent on supportive housing, mental health services, and recovery programs. Police need resources to arrest and imprison drug dealers and end open-air drug use. This is just common sense.

Unfortunately, the Soroses are just the tip of the iceberg.

I spent years fundraising for Democrats. I raised millions of dollars. And in the process, I routinely saw and heard about inappropriate relationships between donors and candidates that would bust anyone's bubble about the independence of our leaders. There is an entire donor ecosystem working against the interests of regular Americans—and it's the one top Democrats are swimming in.

Consider the long-time friendship between Kamala Harris and billionaire donor Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Steve Jobs. The New York Times described the women as being so close that they've gone on vacation together and consider each other family. Powell Jobs sat in Harris' exclusive friends and family suite at the DNC last month. She was also instrumental in getting Biden to step down to clear the way for Harris; one of her top aides circulated a polling memo to other key influential donors that allegedly showed Biden's inability to win.

It was another example of a megadonor overcoming the will of the people—and making things worse for voters. Now that the Kool-Aid from the DNC is wearing off, people are waking up to the realities of an untested candidate. Harris is barely beating Biden in key swing state polls, dodges questions from the press, and continually gaffes answers on significant policy issues. She can barely answer basic questions about her plans for regular people in friendly encounters with people like Oprah.

This is what happens when a candidate is anointed by donors and not selected by voters.

Or take Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn. He is a megadonor—a "big fish" as we would call him behind the scenes—and is expected to spend up to $100 million to ensure that Vice President Kamala Harris beats former President Donald Trump in the presidential election. But Hoffman has an agenda: He has publicly called for the resignation of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan, who Hoffman said is "at war with American business."

The reality is somewhat different: Khan has been one of the only lifelines for working people in the modern Democratic machine. She stood up for workers' rights by banning non-compete agreements and led efforts to block major mergers of grocery stores like the Kroger-Albertsons, which would have resulted in higher food prices and hurt union workers.

If Hoffman is successful in his public campaign to replace Khan, he will further cement the Democrats as the party of the wealthy, the powerful, and corporate elite. I won't be surprised when he gets the job done.

Another name I've seen pop up many times in my years fundraising for progressive candidates is the San Francisco based Democratic donor and influencer Steve Phillips. Phillips has written books that focus heavily on the importance of race in politics, with titles like Brown Is the New White: How the Demographic Revolution Has Created a New American Majority and How We Win the Civil War: Securing a Multiracial Democracy and Ending White Supremacy for Good.

Yet, Donald Trump is on track to secure more support from minority voters, especially Black men, than any other Republican in generations. It's becoming increasingly clear that the real divide is the one separating the college educated from the working class of all races. But Phillips and others like him continue to focus exclusively on race—and you can see the direct impact this has on Democratic politicians, who talk much more about things like "equity" than they do about the class divide.

It's out of touch with the pulse of the country and deeply alienating to working-class voters who were once stalwart Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Democrats aren't getting the message. Last week, Alexander Soros posted images at his opulent New York mansion on X with Harris' VP pick, Tim Walz.

Is this how you convince people you're the party of the people? By posing with a billionaire nepo baby while Americans struggle to pay for groceries?

Some Democrats surely know how damaging such a photo is to their flailing brand. But Soros has so much power and influence that no one would dare tell him to take the photo down.

Internally, the Democrats know that like the photo of Walz with Alex Sorors, the Soros-funded criminal justice policies have been an embarrassing failure from an outcome, messaging, and public perception standpoint. They also know that Reid Hoffman and Laurene Powell Jobs do not have the best interests of regular Americans at heart—but they will continue to cower to them anyway.

Forget "Kamala is Brat" or the "Joy!" campaign. The image of Soros with Walz perfectly encapsulates the Democrats' real vibe these days—the unfettered influence the donors have over this party and the lives they've destroyed in the process.
Who wrote that? Who was too scared to put his/her name on that piece?
 
Who wrote that? Who was too scared to put his/her name on that piece?

Evan Barker - who finally got small claim to fame doing rounds on conservative shows shitting on Democratic party.

He complains that billionares and celebrities have alot of pull in the Democrat party (ummm DUH)...while of course giving no equal commentary on what Republican party is about.
 
If Border Czar Harris had actually closed the border

What the fuck? VP has no such authority and for some reason you gave president Trump full pass for never having done it.

2019 had record ecounters at the border, how come you had zero such demands for Trump? Obviously because you are just a hack, jumping form one argument of convinience to the next.
 
So then you disagree with the very article you are quoting.

Want to go google some more articles because you can't stand to admit that Trump obviously sunk a bipartisan Deport More bill so he could have something to run on?

I honestly feel bad for you all you mindfucked Trumptards, twisting yourself into pretzels like this must take a toll.
A border security bill that doesn't secure the border? Why would anyone vote for that?

If Biden/Harris actually wanted to secure the border...they could have done it 3 years ago with EO's! They obviously didn't want to stop the flow of illegals.
 
During the summer of 2020, I worked as a consultant for multiple progressive DA candidates backed by George Soros and his foundation. In the places where they won, these DAs have since done immeasurable damage to the local communities. They failed to prosecute offenders, especially surrounding drug use and distribution, and allowed crime to run rampant, hurting communities of color the most—the very people they were supposedly trying to help.

Far from progressive, these Soros-backed DAs did more to hurt progressives than anything the Right has managed; to everyday Americans, the term "progressive" now conjures up images of fentanyl overdoses, crime, defecation in the streets, and riots.

I feel remorse for the work I did on these campaigns. The Soros money that was contributed to progressive DA races would have been better spent on supportive housing, mental health services, and recovery programs. Police need resources to arrest and imprison drug dealers and end open-air drug use. This is just common sense.

Unfortunately, the Soroses are just the tip of the iceberg.

I spent years fundraising for Democrats. I raised millions of dollars. And in the process, I routinely saw and heard about inappropriate relationships between donors and candidates that would bust anyone's bubble about the independence of our leaders. There is an entire donor ecosystem working against the interests of regular Americans—and it's the one top Democrats are swimming in.

Consider the long-time friendship between Kamala Harris and billionaire donor Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Steve Jobs. The New York Times described the women as being so close that they've gone on vacation together and consider each other family. Powell Jobs sat in Harris' exclusive friends and family suite at the DNC last month. She was also instrumental in getting Biden to step down to clear the way for Harris; one of her top aides circulated a polling memo to other key influential donors that allegedly showed Biden's inability to win.

It was another example of a megadonor overcoming the will of the people—and making things worse for voters. Now that the Kool-Aid from the DNC is wearing off, people are waking up to the realities of an untested candidate. Harris is barely beating Biden in key swing state polls, dodges questions from the press, and continually gaffes answers on significant policy issues. She can barely answer basic questions about her plans for regular people in friendly encounters with people like Oprah.

This is what happens when a candidate is anointed by donors and not selected by voters.

Or take Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn. He is a megadonor—a "big fish" as we would call him behind the scenes—and is expected to spend up to $100 million to ensure that Vice President Kamala Harris beats former President Donald Trump in the presidential election. But Hoffman has an agenda: He has publicly called for the resignation of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan, who Hoffman said is "at war with American business."

The reality is somewhat different: Khan has been one of the only lifelines for working people in the modern Democratic machine. She stood up for workers' rights by banning non-compete agreements and led efforts to block major mergers of grocery stores like the Kroger-Albertsons, which would have resulted in higher food prices and hurt union workers.

If Hoffman is successful in his public campaign to replace Khan, he will further cement the Democrats as the party of the wealthy, the powerful, and corporate elite. I won't be surprised when he gets the job done.

Another name I've seen pop up many times in my years fundraising for progressive candidates is the San Francisco based Democratic donor and influencer Steve Phillips. Phillips has written books that focus heavily on the importance of race in politics, with titles like Brown Is the New White: How the Demographic Revolution Has Created a New American Majority and How We Win the Civil War: Securing a Multiracial Democracy and Ending White Supremacy for Good.

Yet, Donald Trump is on track to secure more support from minority voters, especially Black men, than any other Republican in generations. It's becoming increasingly clear that the real divide is the one separating the college educated from the working class of all races. But Phillips and others like him continue to focus exclusively on race—and you can see the direct impact this has on Democratic politicians, who talk much more about things like "equity" than they do about the class divide.

It's out of touch with the pulse of the country and deeply alienating to working-class voters who were once stalwart Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Democrats aren't getting the message. Last week, Alexander Soros posted images at his opulent New York mansion on X with Harris' VP pick, Tim Walz.

Is this how you convince people you're the party of the people? By posing with a billionaire nepo baby while Americans struggle to pay for groceries?

Some Democrats surely know how damaging such a photo is to their flailing brand. But Soros has so much power and influence that no one would dare tell him to take the photo down.

Internally, the Democrats know that like the photo of Walz with Alex Sorors, the Soros-funded criminal justice policies have been an embarrassing failure from an outcome, messaging, and public perception standpoint. They also know that Reid Hoffman and Laurene Powell Jobs do not have the best interests of regular Americans at heart—but they will continue to cower to them anyway.

Forget "Kamala is Brat" or the "Joy!" campaign. The image of Soros with Walz perfectly encapsulates the Democrats' real vibe these days—the unfettered influence the donors have over this party and the lives they've destroyed in the process.
A lot of words,
REALLITY IS BILLIONAIRES HAVE WAY WAY WAY TO MUCH INFLUENCE ON HOW WE LIVE.
And it is Not limited to any one political party...
 
So then you disagree with the very article you are quoting.

Want to go google some more articles because you can't stand to admit that Trump obviously sunk a bipartisan Deport More bill so he could have something to run on?

I honestly feel bad for you all you mindfucked Trumptards, twisting yourself into pretzels like this must take a toll.
You still have never proven the bill would have actually increased deportations. It said ICE could. Didn't say it would.
 
What the fuck? VP has no such authority and for some reason you gave president Trump full pass for never having done it.

2019 had record ecounters at the border, how come you had zero such demands for Trump? Obviously because you are just a hack, jumping form one argument of convinience to the next.
Biden gave her the authority, you idiot.

She had years to fix it. She did nothing but invite more illegals in. And you kiss her feet for it.
 
Biden gave her the authority, you idiot.

She had years to fix it. She did nothing but invite more illegals in. And you kiss her feet for it.

No he didn't and lets note how you don't have the balls to comment on Trump never closing the border.

You are a hack, own up to it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom