Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement (175 yrs)

[abu afak]

The "science" they were covering was getting more and more political, anyway.

"Climate change" as if the earth has not endured ice ages and warming spells since time immemorial.

There's a NIV Bible and a deck of standard playing cards in the back room of all this science.

Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Opposing (The AGW Consensus)

Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.".."[28][30]

`

 

[Sunni Man]

I didn't know the rag was still being published? ...

 

[Billy_Bob]

expert opinion

SA isn't an expert on anything... they are promoting opinions and nothing more...

 

[easyt65]

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement

The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

www.politico.com

09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​

The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​

​

“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.​

​

“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​

The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​

​

“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​

[.....]​

`

Do they mean the 'Science' has so strongly embraced and stuck to all this time?


Masks, Promising to shutdown the country again, Travel Ban oppositions.....flip....flop....flip...flop....

"These Joe Biden Flip Flops on COVID-19 Prove He's Incapable of Leading During the Pandemic"
Joe Biden's many flip-flops on COVID-19 show he doesn't have the ability to lead America through a pandemic.

The 'Science' from what leading Scientists called the 'worst model that could have been used' to project horrifically proven-wrong projections on how severe the virus would be?

The 'science' that led Democrats to tell Americans to ignore virus warning, to continue to go about their lives without concern, to come to China Town', to 'ride packed subways' lick turn styles, and huddles in large masses?

The science behind the life-saving travel ban he and fellow Democrats opposed, calling it 'Xenophobic' and leading them to author legislation intended to block it?

The 'Science' that led Democrats like Pelosi to order businesses to be closed / shuttered ... except for the one where SHE always has her done?

The 'Science' that led Cuomo to acknowledged the elderly are most vulnerable to die from the virus but convinced Cuomo it was okay to pack nursing homes with infected patients?

 

[GreenBean]

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement

The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

www.politico.com

09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​

The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​

​

“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.​

​

“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​

The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​

​

“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​

[.....]​

`

Scientific American is not American - it is owned mostly by a German group known as Springer Nature - Germans don't like the Trumpster as he is forcing them to pay their fare share in many International endeavors instead of dipping into Uncle Sams pocket

 

[justinacolmena]

owned mostly by a German group known as Springer Nature

And it's all the usual German academic paper mills, Elsevier and others, which they promote, certainly nothing "American" to speak of.

 

[WTF19]

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement

The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

www.politico.com

09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​

The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​

​

“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.​

​

“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​

The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​

​

“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​

[.....]​

`

who? you mean someone that didnt like what your president TRUMP said, and this is his punishment? oh well, thay cant help with those looters, murderers, and rioters anyhow, its got nothing to do w/science

 

[WTF19]

If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------

Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.

please have respect for yourself and realize the dems are the ones that played it down and invited every1 to their party in chinatown---remember? when TRUMP closed borders and you idiots claimed it was xenophobic, come on lets party in china town was their answer--remember? when douchebag pill-osi closed the country AFTER TRUMP took all precautions for every AMERICAN--remember? im here to remind you

 

[Cellblock2429]

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement

The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

www.politico.com

09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​

The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​

​

“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.​

​

“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​

The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​

​

“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​

[.....]​

`

/———/ Leftist endorse Leftist.

 

[Norman]

President Trump takes Americans to Mars.

Biden... instead of the rocket ships the flames will be seen on our houses via Biden riots.

 

[Thinker101]

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement

The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.

www.politico.com

09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​

The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​

​

“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.​

​

“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​

The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​

​

“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​

[.....]​

`

Laura Helmuth is an American science journalist and the Editor in Chief of Scientific American. She was formerly the Health and Science editor at The Washington Post.

Laura Helmuth - Wikipedia

 

[abu afak]

Laura Helmuth is an American science journalist and the Editor in Chief of Scientific American. She was formerly the Health and Science editor at The Washington Post.
Laura Helmuth - Wikipedia

. It's almost certainly not just "her opinion."
2. You DISHONESTLY 'short-quoted' Wikipedia.


"....Helmuth began her writing career as a staff reporter and editor for Science Magazine, from 1999 to 2004.[6] She then became a Science Editor at Smithsonian Magazine, where she remained from 2004 to 2012 before becoming the Science and Health editor at the online magazine Slate.[7] During her four-year tenure, she became known for Slate's imaginative science coverage, which included a series that explored the science of longevity about why humans are living longer than they have before.[8] On April 28, 2016, Helmuth became The Washington Post's editor of Health, Science and Environment, overseeing a team of 13 journalists.[9] On April 13, 2020, Helmuth succeeded Mariette DiChristina as the ninth Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American.[1]

Throughout the course of her career, Helmuth has developed a reputation for bringing rigor to coverage of science. She has written about and lectured on combatting misinformation through science journalism.[10][11] While at the Washington Post, she oversaw the development of a video series called "The Vaccine Project," written by Anna Rothschild and Brian Monroe, to address vaccine hesitancy. She has also taken advantage of the mystery format to draw readers into rigorous medical coverage with a Post series called "Medical Mysteries."[11] Most recently, she developed a tip sheet for journalists covering the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, noting that "repetition makes misinformation feel more true."[12][13]

Leadership and service

Helmuth serves as a member of a Standing Committee on Advancing Science Communication Research and Practice in the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.[14][15]
She has also given lectures at institutions like the American Institute of Physics, the National Academy of Sciences, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison about how science journalists can counter misinformation and address uncertainty in their reporting.[16][17]

From 2016 to 2018, Helmuth served as the President of the National Association of Science Writers.[18]
She serves on the boards of Society for Science and the Public, High Country News, the Geological Society of Washington, Spectrum magazine (an initiative of the Simons Foundation), and the American Association for the Advancement of Science's service SciLine.[19]...

`

 

[basquebromance]

this will secure the election for Biden!

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[tyroneweaver]

our government basically funds global warming advocates and well as subsidizes covid outbreaks.
So I'm not surprised

 

[Ben Thomson]

this will secure the election for Biden!

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Republicans don't care..they think science is some kind of hoax anyway.

 

[Billy_Bob]

this will secure the election for Biden!

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Wrong again..... Its a left wing rag and has ZERO CREDIBILITY! , Keep dreaming.

 

[Billy_Bob]

this will secure the election for Biden!

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Republicans don't care..they think science is some kind of hoax anyway.

SA prints opinions now... they are not related to science in any form any more... They are political propagandists now...

 

[Ben Thomson]

this will secure the election for Biden!

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Republicans don't care..they think science is some kind of hoax anyway.

SA prints opinions now... they are not related to science in any form any more... They are political propagandists now...

Would you be saying that if they endorsed Trump??

 

[Billy_Bob]

this will secure the election for Biden!

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history—until now

www.scientificamerican.com

Republicans don't care..they think science is some kind of hoax anyway.

SA prints opinions now... they are not related to science in any form any more... They are political propagandists now...

Would you be saying that if they endorsed Trump??

Yep!

These people are in the far left wacko realm these days...

 

[BluesLegend]

There's BIG climate change government PORK spending in the scientific community.