Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement (175 yrs)

Grampa Murked U

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
82,384
Reaction score
21,331
Points
2,205
Location
Kansas City
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Pointless but congrats?
 

22lcidw

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2018
Messages
13,826
Reaction score
3,679
Points
275
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
The globalists and their one hundred quadrillion dollar boondoggle fraud eco energy agendas for global climate change bull are the reasons.
 

Missouri_Mike

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
16,798
Reaction score
5,421
Points
350
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Why are people so political and not believing in all things science!?

Oh, shit, never mind.
 

Meister

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
41,504
Reaction score
14,974
Points
2,250
Location
Conservative part of the Northwest
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
I am going to lose sleep over this one. Wow, just wow, I tell you.:04:
 

Missouri_Mike

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
16,798
Reaction score
5,421
Points
350
After 175 years the SA has decided to go political. I would argue that happened about ten years ago but they have finally made their stand.

Globull warming never was about science, never was about the planet and never was about people. It’s always been about money and control.

This should be obvious to everyone by now.
 

Issa

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
7,931
Reaction score
945
Points
275
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
Your making a fool of yourself...

Trump did not "downplay the virus" but Biden and your pukes did... Trump followed the protocols of the profesionals like Fauci... Now your saying Trump didn't follow their advice? :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
Trump is the president and not Biden.
I stated why he failed miserably.
And mo he wasnt following Fauci recommendations. The asshole disnt even wanna wear a mask till later on.
Keep on following him blindly.
 

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
23,571
Reaction score
4,738
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Pointless but congrats?
No one expects your dumbass to appreciate science Gramps.
 

Issa

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
7,931
Reaction score
945
Points
275
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
please have respect for yourself and realize the dems are the ones that played it down and invited every1 to their party in chinatown---remember? when TRUMP closed borders and you idiots claimed it was xenophobic, come on lets party in china town was their answer--remember? when douchebag pill-osi closed the country AFTER TRUMP took all precautions for every AMERICAN--remember? im here to remind you
And what makes you agree I agree with the dems or Pelosi ? As as far as I'm concerned teump failed miserably.
 

Grampa Murked U

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
82,384
Reaction score
21,331
Points
2,205
Location
Kansas City
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Pointless but congrats?
No one expects your dumbass to appreciate science Gramps.
Science has nothing to do with political endorsements ya moron
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
60,942
Reaction score
10,561
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Pathetic. Sports, science, everything is political now. You can't escape it
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
60,942
Reaction score
10,561
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
please have respect for yourself and realize the dems are the ones that played it down and invited every1 to their party in chinatown---remember? when TRUMP closed borders and you idiots claimed it was xenophobic, come on lets party in china town was their answer--remember? when douchebag pill-osi closed the country AFTER TRUMP took all precautions for every AMERICAN--remember? im here to remind you
And what makes you agree I agree with the dems or Pelosi ? As as far as I'm concerned teump failed miserably.
Well, Democrats have certainly tried to trip Trump every step of the way. Yet he's still been a far better President than Obama or Slick or Hillary would have been
 

bendog

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
34,908
Reaction score
4,120
Points
1,140
Location
Dog House in back yard
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
It's going to just blow away. And it's going to get cooler
 

bendog

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
34,908
Reaction score
4,120
Points
1,140
Location
Dog House in back yard
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Pathetic. Sports, science, everything is political now. You can't escape it
It's going to get cooler. and he did all anyone could do about the virus. No one disputes this.
 

Issa

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
7,931
Reaction score
945
Points
275
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
please have respect for yourself and realize the dems are the ones that played it down and invited every1 to their party in chinatown---remember? when TRUMP closed borders and you idiots claimed it was xenophobic, come on lets party in china town was their answer--remember? when douchebag pill-osi closed the country AFTER TRUMP took all precautions for every AMERICAN--remember? im here to remind you
And what makes you agree I agree with the dems or Pelosi ? As as far as I'm concerned teump failed miserably.
Well, Democrats have certainly tried to trip Trump every step of the way. Yet he's still been a far better President than Obama or Slick or Hillary would have been
Better? Please wake up.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
60,942
Reaction score
10,561
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
please have respect for yourself and realize the dems are the ones that played it down and invited every1 to their party in chinatown---remember? when TRUMP closed borders and you idiots claimed it was xenophobic, come on lets party in china town was their answer--remember? when douchebag pill-osi closed the country AFTER TRUMP took all precautions for every AMERICAN--remember? im here to remind you
And what makes you agree I agree with the dems or Pelosi ? As as far as I'm concerned teump failed miserably.
Well, Democrats have certainly tried to trip Trump every step of the way. Yet he's still been a far better President than Obama or Slick or Hillary would have been
Better? Please wake up.
Just turn on the news and see the endless violence in inner cities and Democrat extremism on spending on growing government and it's pretty clear that Trump is better than the Democrat alternative by far.

I didn't vote for Trump in 2016. I will in November. And it's mostly because of you. You finally convinced me the parties are no longer the same and yours has gone insane and we have to stop you
 

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
60,063
Reaction score
8,314
Points
2,070
Being patient is extremely difficult but it can also be rewarding. Keep your eyes on the prize. Philippians 3:14.

Trump has his eyes on the prize, and it's not liberal rag endorsements, but who wins on November 3
 

Issa

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
7,931
Reaction score
945
Points
275
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
please have respect for yourself and realize the dems are the ones that played it down and invited every1 to their party in chinatown---remember? when TRUMP closed borders and you idiots claimed it was xenophobic, come on lets party in china town was their answer--remember? when douchebag pill-osi closed the country AFTER TRUMP took all precautions for every AMERICAN--remember? im here to remind you
And what makes you agree I agree with the dems or Pelosi ? As as far as I'm concerned teump failed miserably.
Well, Democrats have certainly tried to trip Trump every step of the way. Yet he's still been a far better President than Obama or Slick or Hillary would have been
Better? Please wake up.
Just turn on the news and see the endless violence in inner cities and Democrat extremism on spending on growing government and it's pretty clear that Trump is better than the Democrat alternative by far.

I didn't vote for Trump in 2016. I will in November. And it's mostly because of you. You finally convinced me the parties are no longer the same and yours has gone insane and we have to stop you
Go on put Trump in for another 4 years so he can burn it down to the ground. All he does is add fuel to the fires. I'll sit here and watch.
 

WTF19

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
1,605
Reaction score
981
Points
893
Next they'r e gonna say Obama wasn't Kenyan. Sad.
no , BARRAG o was just plain ol worthless. who gives a shit where IT came from? IT already scammed AMERICA
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top