Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement (175 yrs)

abu afak

ALLAH SNACKBAR!
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
3,335
Reaction score
850
Points
315
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
 
Last edited:

Turtlesoup

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
1,984
Reaction score
2,312
Points
1,893
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
 

Turtlesoup

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
1,984
Reaction score
2,312
Points
1,893
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Ahhh...that explains it Washington POst flunky took over as editor and chief 5 months ago....................

Tired of the corrupt media.
 

JGalt

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
30,945
Reaction score
13,042
Points
1,620
Location
SW Wisconsin
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Well that's news. It's good that Joe Biden finally got his first ever endorsement.

But if he's really going to win, he's gonna need more endorsements than just that one.
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
53,762
Reaction score
11,062
Points
2,040
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
So some hack has taken over as editor probably and decided to ruin 175 years of tradition of staying the fuck out of at least presidential politics.


Big fucking deal.
 

irosie91

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
71,513
Reaction score
6,827
Points
1,815
What's Scientific American?

Why should I care?
I care sassy-----it is a fairly good, for amateur's thing.
HOWEVER its comment seems to me unwarranted and MOST OF ALL, PARTISAN-----dem editors is
probably mostly democrats by custom
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
2,851
Reaction score
630
Points
140
Location
alaska, usa
The "science" they were covering was getting more and more political, anyway.

"Climate change" as if the earth has not endured ice ages and warming spells since time immemorial.

There's a NIV Bible and a deck of standard playing cards in the back room of all this science.
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
50,287
Reaction score
17,804
Points
2,280
The "science" they were covering was getting more and more political, anyway.

"Climate change" as if the earth has not endured ice ages and warming spells since time immemorial.

There's a NIV Bible and a deck of standard playing cards in the back room of all this science.
They did a whole issue on "gender".
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
53,762
Reaction score
11,062
Points
2,040
The "science" they were covering was getting more and more political, anyway.

"Climate change" as if the earth has not endured ice ages and warming spells since time immemorial.

There's a NIV Bible and a deck of standard playing cards in the back room of all this science.
They did a whole issue on "gender".
I thought gender was a social construct, not science, or is it science and not a social construct?

Or is it whatever it needs to be to make the SJW viewpoint the "right" one.....
 

ImAlwaysRight

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
422
Reaction score
977
Points
158
Location
Texas
Scientific American backs Biden in first-ever endorsement
The 175-year-old magazine said it was 'compelled' by Trump's skepticism of scientific experts, handling of pandemic.
09/15/2020 11:53 AM EDT

Scientific American backed Democrat Joe Biden for president on Tuesday, the magazine's first-ever White House endorsement in its 175-year history.​
The magazine's editors wrote that they felt "compelled" to back Biden in his effort to unseat President Donald Trump. Scientific American cited Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and his skepticism of expert opinion and mainstream science on issues like climate change as the impetus for its decision.​
“The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science,” editors wrote for its October issue.
“Joe Biden, in contrast, comes prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of legitimate science in policy making. He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals.”​
The editorial focuses much of its attention on the pandemic response and Trump’s repeated attempts to minimize the severity of the situation, which has killed nearly 200,000 Americans to date.​
“At every stage, Trump has rejected the unmistakable lesson that controlling the disease, not downplaying it, is the path to economic reopening and recovery,” editors wrote."..."​
[.....]​

`
Another liberal fairy tale! Once upon a time this would have been meaningful but not any more. SA has been in decline for years, some say decades, now they are more about politics and sensationalism than science. An endorsement from SA is about as prestigious as an endorsement fro CNN.
 
Last edited:

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
2,851
Reaction score
630
Points
140
Location
alaska, usa

Issa

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
7,952
Reaction score
949
Points
275
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
24,741
Reaction score
10,874
Points
1,280
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
If they were truly scientific---they would not be able to back SENILE BIDEN and would admit that Trump did all he could to stop the spread of the wuhan virus. Tired of the mentally ill on the left trying to affect the election------
Please have some respect for yourself. Trump downplayed the virus and made the situation worse. Even he refused to wear a mask and gathered crowds. He 3ncouranged the spread of the virus.
Your making a fool of yourself...

Trump did not "downplay the virus" but Biden and your pukes did... Trump followed the protocols of the profesionals like Fauci... Now your saying Trump didn't follow their advice? :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top