Science proves Roe v. Wade wrong, humanity doesn't start at 20 weeks

What else can it be? A fish or bird? You fucking morons play semantics to deny reality.
As ignorant as you are, you aren't prepared for this kind of debate. But you will continue to look like a fool. Some folks just don't get it.
 
Now we are getting somewhere. You just destroyed your own argument. "Killing it." What is "it?" I never knew you could kill an "it."
You also call a newborn baby that you don’t know it’s gender an ”it”, dumbass.
 
A Fetus does not have fully developed organs and limbs. Read the science you idiot. Once again, you are falling flat on your face with this gross display of ignorance. You don't have a clue. You are making a fool of yourself with facts that you don't have. You keep pulling shit out of your ass. Stop doing that. It's embarrassing.

If you want to lock horns with educated arguments, educate yourself fool.
You read the science moron, you have no idea what you’re talking about. At 16 weeks, not much difference between a baby developing and growing in their mother’s womb than a child developing, growing big and tall outside.

16 weeks pregnant is how many months?​

If you're 16 weeks pregnant, you're in month 4 of your pregnancy. Only 5 months left to go! Still have questions? Here's some more information on how weeks, months and trimesters are broken down in pregnancy.

The backbone and tiny muscles in your baby's back are gaining strength, so she can straighten out that head and neck even more.

Baby's eyes are working​

Thanks to those developing facial muscles, your baby is capable of making a few expressive frowns and squints, even at this early stage.

Baby's beautiful eyes are finally working too, making small side-to-side movements and perceiving light, although the eyelids are still sealed. Peekaboo!

Baby's skin is transparent​

Your fetus is becoming a looker too — with a face that's starting to look more human — but a skinny looker, since there's no baby fat yet.

And here's the skinny on baby skin: It's practically translucent now, so if you took a peek inside your uterus, you'd be able to see your baby's blood vessels under that thin skin.

Baby will soon hear your voice​

Listen up: Tiny bones in your fetus' ears are in place, making it likely that baby will soon be able to hear your voice (or something like it) when you're speaking. Generally, babies fully develop the ability to hear in the womb by 18 weeks of pregnancy.

In fact, studies have found that babies who hear a song while they're in the womb recognize the same tune when it's sung to them after they’re born — so choose your lullabies with that in mind.
 
You also call a newborn baby that you don’t know it’s gender an ”it”, dumbass.
LOLOL

No, you don't. Even your next post after this one doesn't refer to a baby as "it." You slipped up, you know you slipped up, but you can't bring yourself to admit you slipped up.
 
LOLOL

No, you don't. Even your next post after this one doesn't refer to a baby as "it." You slipped up, you know you slipped up, but you can't bring yourself to admit you slipped up.
People refer to babies as it all the time. Get lost hack.
 
People refer to babies as it all the time. Get lost hack.
LOLOL

Let's say you have a sister. You walk into her hospital room to visit where she just had her baby and you don't know the sex yet... no fucking way would you refer to her baby as "it." You would ask something like, is that my niece or my nephew?" Or, "what's the baby's name?"

BWK was right -- you destroyed your own argument. You could have said, "ah I see, so kill the baby at will." But you didn't because even you don't think of it as a baby.
 
Sigh.

Let's try this again. The Second Amendment is one of the Bill of Rights. Get it now?
The right to privacy is also an amendment.

Government doesn't have any rights, they have restraints on their power.

The government does not have constitutional power given to them, to demand that we tell them something so personal and private, whether we are having sex, or are pregnant from having sex, or are not pregnant.... Whether we choose to grow our family or not grow our family, is not the government's decision to make....up and until the point where there is another viable person involved, where the SC ruled the govt could then have a say, for this other person to be....

is my understanding of Roe v Wade....
 
According to who, you? :auiqs.jpg: The second was written to control slaves. We no longer have slaves.

Lol!!!
The Second is one of the Bill of Rights, that's not an opinion dummy, that is a fact! Regardless of WHY it exists, is irrelevant as far as 'rights' are concerned.
Healthcare on the other hand, is NOT in the Constitution.
 
The right to privacy is also an amendment.

Government doesn't have any rights, they have restraints on their power.

The government does not have constitutional power given to them, to demand that we tell them something so personal and private, whether we are having sex, or are pregnant from having sex, or are not pregnant.... Whether we choose to grow our family or not grow our family, is not the government's decision to make....up and until the point where there is another viable person involved, where the SC ruled the govt could then have a say, for this other person to be....

is my understanding of Roe v Wade....

Yes, Roe is based on the Fourth Amendment. Abortion however, is not a constitutional right according to a direct reading of the text of the Constitution, but it has been justified as a constitutional right under the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy.
 
LOLOL

Let's say you have a sister. You walk into her hospital room to visit where she just had her baby and you don't know the sex yet... no fucking way would you refer to her baby as "it." You would ask something like, is that my niece or my nephew?" Or, "what's the baby's name?"

BWK was right -- you destroyed your own argument. You could have said, "ah I see, so kill the baby at will." But you didn't because even you don't think of it as a baby.
Further proof you are an ignorant undereducated moron. I’ve seen babies being referred to as it hundreds of times, especially when they are newborns or infants and their sex cannot be easily determined.


2. (used to represent a person or animal understood, previously mentioned, or about to be mentioned whose gender is unknown or disregarded): Who was it? It was John.
 
Last edited:
Let’s say you see a baby across the street, turn around and ask, how old is it? I’ve seen babies being referred to as it hundreds of times, especially when they are newborns or infants and their sex cannot be easily determined.
You would ask, "how old is your baby?"

Squirm on.
 
You would ask, "how old is your baby?"

Squirm on.
Did you see this, dumbass? Perhaps a night school so you can at least get your junior high diploma. Now go go under the rock you crawled out from.



2. (used to represent a person or animal understood, previously mentioned, or about to be mentioned whose gender is unknown or disregarded): Who was it? It was John.
 
Did you see this, dumbass? Perhaps a night school so you can at least get your junior high diploma. Now go go under the rock you crawled out from.



2. (used to represent a person or animal understood, previously mentioned, or about to be mentioned whose gender is unknown or disregarded): Who was it? It was John.
Great, prove personhood begins at 16 weeks...
 
And then it will become an adult. It's a new, unique human life from conception. Just because we label the stages of its evolution with different terms does not mean that all stages aren't a human life.
Not all human lives are worth saving, it depends on the situation. Also, not all of us consider a few strands of DNA to be entitled to more protection than an adult human.
 
Great, prove personhood begins at 16 weeks...
^^^^
Personhood! Ha ha ha what a lunatic.

An ignorant Leftist with no self respect or intellectual honesty, that can‘t admit they were wrong. What a surprise.

Didn’t you say babies are “never” referred to as it and therefore that means they can’t be considered as human?

Keep embarrassing yourself weasel, you’re a great example of the stupidity and insanity that permeates the Left.
 
Last edited:
You read the science moron, you have no idea what you’re talking about. At 16 weeks, not much difference between a baby developing and growing in their mother’s womb than a child developing, growing big and tall outside.

16 weeks pregnant is how many months?​

If you're 16 weeks pregnant, you're in month 4 of your pregnancy. Only 5 months left to go! Still have questions? Here's some more information on how weeks, months and trimesters are broken down in pregnancy.

The backbone and tiny muscles in your baby's back are gaining strength, so she can straighten out that head and neck even more.

Baby's eyes are working​

Thanks to those developing facial muscles, your baby is capable of making a few expressive frowns and squints, even at this early stage.

Baby's beautiful eyes are finally working too, making small side-to-side movements and perceiving light, although the eyelids are still sealed. Peekaboo!

Baby's skin is transparent​

Your fetus is becoming a looker too — with a face that's starting to look more human — but a skinny looker, since there's no baby fat yet.

And here's the skinny on baby skin: It's practically translucent now, so if you took a peek inside your uterus, you'd be able to see your baby's blood vessels under that thin skin.

Baby will soon hear your voice​

Listen up: Tiny bones in your fetus' ears are in place, making it likely that baby will soon be able to hear your voice (or something like it) when you're speaking. Generally, babies fully develop the ability to hear in the womb by 18 weeks of pregnancy.

In fact, studies have found that babies who hear a song while they're in the womb recognize the same tune when it's sung to them after they’re born — so choose your lullabies with that in mind.
Repeating the same dried up arguments doesn't change the argument. Once again you show us just how clueless you are.
 
^^^^
Personhood! Ha ha ha what a lunatic.

An ignorant Leftist with no self respect or intellectual honesty, that can‘t admit they were wrong. What a surprise.

Didn’t you say babies are “never” referred to as it and therefore that means they can’t be considered as human?

Keep embarrassing yourself weasel, you’re a great example of the stupidity and insanity that permeates the Left.
You were asked to prove personhood and you can't. Why? Because you aren't God. You have no intelligent arguments.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top