End time prophecy is silly. For you, the bible may be the standard for fact and reality by which everything else is to be judged. That is your right. However, you cannot insist that should be imposed on anyone else. The bible contains no scientific theory whatsoever. True science clearly does contradict the bible, in many ways which cannot be reconciled. The origins of life are not out of supernatural intervention. Humans did not originate from the dust, and a rib. The world was never covered with a global flood -there is overwhelming evidence against such an event. Languages did not originate from the Tower of Babel. The earth is not immoble: it rotates and moves through space. The stars are not for signs and seasons. The earth is not flat.Nothing silly about end time prophecy. It's unfolding even more than most realize.
You're not going to make it to 2060, so it doesn't matter if you believe it or not. You'll just end up in a bad place after death and eventually end up you know where.
Yes, but what should we do when we see/hear "from the face of the serpent?"Check out minute 21:10 where it is wrongly stated "to the serpent". It should read "from the face of the serpent." This is incredibly important, and is likely why it was deliberately changed.
How did I catch that you ask? I guess I know my Bible.
It's in the Bible, but you are already in a bad place so you believe another who whispers in your ear. You already discarded Sir Isaac Newton.
I believe Sir Isaac Newton and he believed the Bible. It's more evidence for science backing Biblical creation. Facts are facts.
What secular beliefs?
Testing, evidence and facts fully support the ToE. It's not a belief.
There is no requirement for belief when facts support the theory. You are free to embrace a 17th century worldview but the notion of various gods guiding the natural world is just not relevant.
Why do you think your triune God is any more "real" than any of the other, competing versions of gods?
