Science and Religion
I heard from some christians who denie the evolution, some are even flat earthers, but I am theological evolutionary, I combine both. I believe the ulitmate origin of the world, the universe and all creatures is God. He created everything but science finds out "how he did it". I combine both.
Science is more or less worthless beyond the religious purposes and intents which it serves, whether we're talking the fairly recent Baconian natural sciences, and the axioms and mathematical approximations they're founded upon and constructed from, or any other strain of innovative or creative thinking, abstraction, and formalization, philosophical, theological, psychological, technological, and so on and so forth.
^^
Said the fool on his quantum mechanical device....
If I was using my quantum mechanical device to wire money to ISIS in hopes they would bomb civilians, it would be rather wicked and worthless.
So long as the quantum mechanical advice is being used in good ways, and good intents, in accordance with religious principles such as the Golden Rule, which our legal systems such as Common Law are founded and predicated upon.
Not to mention the silly and likely exaggerated popular or folk myth in regards to the Baconian system of natural science, falsely leading one to believe that science, as a human endeavor existing as far back as the ancient Greece and before the development of Bacon's specific inductive method, couldn't have developed in any other number of was, and possibly been more beneficial and led to superior technology and innovation than Bacon's specific method, it's mathematical approximations, and axioms it was founded upon.
Being a fairy recent historical invention dating back to the 15-16th century, unlike the only truly "pure" science, mathematics, which as been in development since the ancients in all human societies, I suspect the rather archaic Baconian sciences and their methodologies will eventually die out, as many of the archaic, 19th century theories, such as Newtons are already outdated in favor of newer ones, such as quantum and String theory.
Likely it will be computer and informational sciences, in which most future discoveries will take place, as opposed to the rather archaic natural sciences such as biology, Newtonian physics, and their archaic and dated axioms and approximations, and hopefully all the popular myths and superstitions which surround them, their silly historical myths and quaint teleological claims rooted in various religious or philosophical axioms, like that of the little Humanist cult and its nonscientific fetishization of "science" as some type of quasi-theistic entity rather than just a tiny economic industry and systems and axioms of learning, theorization, or information gathering, such as, again, the Baconian inductive method, its arbitrated industry rules for evidence, testing, mathematically approximating and so forth, and the many little childish false dicthomies and simplifications which simple people so often appeal to, not because they're "true" in any inherent or immutable sense, but solely because their simplistic, convenient little axioms and fables not requiring any deeper reasoning, thought, or mental taxation, as documented by experts like Phillip Tetlock and his research into the sciences of forecasting and thinking, it being simplistic mode of "system 1" thinking which simple and less intelligent people often tend to use and abuse just to impose "coherency" and maintain willful ignorance, rather than due to reasoning or seeking truth or greater understandings and approximations thereof to begin with.
Such as the whole "science / religion" dichotomy to begin with.
