Schiff says whistleblower (/leaker Eric Ciaramella) testimony is 'redundant and unnecessary'

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
30,046
Reaction score
2,786
Points
1,140
Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
Let Trump testify under oath first
I wish.

But it will never happen.

They know he's a runaway perjury machine with a hair trigger.
 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
30,046
Reaction score
2,786
Points
1,140
Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
 

The Original Tree

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
27,520
Reaction score
5,052
Points
290
Location
OHIO
He was mentioned both in The Mueller Report and one of Schiff’s Transcripts. Schiff pulled the transcript off of the server, the. Redacted Ciaramella’s name. Also, I have connections.

Eric Ciaramella is not a whistle blower but he is a Coward, Traitor and Spy hiding behind a Fake Whistleblower status.

Ciaramella was also involved with the bribery and extortion investigation with Hunter and Joe Biden and The Fake Russian Dirty Dossier.

The only reason he isn’t in jail is because in my opinion they were on to him and to save his own neck, he claimed whistleblower status.

He needs to face a firing squad.

He is not a Whistleblower. He also leaked classified calls between The President and Mexico, Thailand and Australia, and when his access was restricted leaked 2nd hand classified information. These are CRIMES.

He committed Espionage and Treason and is hiding behind a fake Whistleblower Status. He is a traitor and coward.

Why aren’t you defending A REAL Whistleblower at ABC who was fired for complaining that ABC squashed a legit story about Epstein and Clinton raping little girls? She not only got fired, she got death threats and is now blackballed.

Why aren’t you defending her?
Plenty of others have testified confirming the whistleblower's complaint. Outing the whistleblower is against the law.

Democrats want to determine the facts. Republicans want to find out who ratted them out.
How do you KNOW who the whistleblower is?
 
Last edited:

The Original Tree

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
27,520
Reaction score
5,052
Points
290
Location
OHIO
If it’s important that all witnesses should be heard. If Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, he should testify. Trump Jr. had no problem testifying. Eric Ciaramella should testify.

Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
 
Last edited:

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
30,046
Reaction score
2,786
Points
1,140
If it’s important than all witnesses should be heard. If Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, he should testify. Trump Jr. had no problem testifying. Eric Ciaramella should testify.

Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
They aren't witnesses.
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
45,661
Reaction score
9,328
Points
2,060
Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Schiff will do what he's told.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
110,416
Reaction score
20,789
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
Plenty of others have testified confirming the whistleblower's complaint. Outing the whistleblower is against the law.

Democrats want to determine the facts. Republicans want to find out who ratted them out.
Why won't he testify? Does he have something to hide?
 

The Original Tree

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
27,520
Reaction score
5,052
Points
290
Location
OHIO
Sure they are. Isn’t this about Hunter Biden”s Corruption amd about The President asking the Ukraine to keep The United States informed on the Status of an ongoing investigations in to Burisma, Soros and The Bidens that were re-opened 6 months prior to the call?

The Attorney General and President of Ukraine should also be interviewed, and so should Ciaramella and Biden, and The Ukraine Prosecutor who Biden got fired. Mueller also should be brought in since he referenced Ciaramella in his report.

If it’s important than all witnesses should be heard. If Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, he should testify. Trump Jr. had no problem testifying. Eric Ciaramella should testify.

Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
They aren't witnesses.
 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
30,046
Reaction score
2,786
Points
1,140
Sure they are. Isn’t this about Hunter Biden”s Corruption amd about The President asking the Ukraine to keep The United States informed on the Status of an ongoing investigations in to Burisma, Soros and The Bidens that were re-opened 6 months prior to the call?

The Attorney General and President of Ukraine should also be interviewed, and so should Ciaramella and Biden, and The Ukraine Prosecutor who Biden got fired. Mueller also should be brought in since he referenced Ciaramella in his report.

If it’s important than all witnesses should be heard. If Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, he should testify. Trump Jr. had no problem testifying. Eric Ciaramella should testify.

Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
They aren't witnesses.
That's a conspiracy theory, not reality.

They are not witnesses.

Why are you tRumplings so mind-bogglingly stupid?
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
110,416
Reaction score
20,789
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
He is not a Whistleblower. He also leaked classified calls between The President and Mexico, Thailand and Australia, and when his access was restricted leaked 2nd hand classified information. These are CRIMES.

He committed Espionage and Treason and is hiding behind a fake Whistleblower Status. He is a traitor and coward.

Why aren’t you defending A REAL Whistleblower at ABC who was fired for complaining that ABC squashed a legit story about Epstein and Clinton raping little girls? She not only got fired, she got death threats and is now blackballed.

Why aren’t you defending her?
Plenty of others have testified confirming the whistleblower's complaint. Outing the whistleblower is against the law.

Democrats want to determine the facts. Republicans want to find out who ratted them out.
Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Nunes wants Schiff to testify??
Schiff says "I'll testify AFTER all of those we subpoenaed show up and testify, motherfucker!"
Schiff is a material witness and co-conspirator, he needs to tell us his relationship with the whistlerblower. How much blowing was involved
 

The Original Tree

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
27,520
Reaction score
5,052
Points
290
Location
OHIO
They are all Material Fact Witnesses. So is Adam Schiff and he needs to be put in the hot seat and asked questions under oath.

The topic is corruption in The Ukraine and Spies Leaking Classified Information, therefore anyone involved in that should be interviewed in public.

Why are you afraid of transparency and a fair process?

If you have nothing to hide, and want to get to the truth, you can’t intentionally avoid some
Facts and not others like Mueller did when he refused to investigate the origins of the Fake Russian Dirty Dossier.

Sure they are. Isn’t this about Hunter Biden”s Corruption amd about The President asking the Ukraine to keep The United States informed on the Status of an ongoing investigations in to Burisma, Soros and The Bidens that were re-opened 6 months prior to the call?

The Attorney General and President of Ukraine should also be interviewed, and so should Ciaramella and Biden, and The Ukraine Prosecutor who Biden got fired. Mueller also should be brought in since he referenced Ciaramella in his report.

If it’s important than all witnesses should be heard. If Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, he should testify. Trump Jr. had no problem testifying. Eric Ciaramella should testify.

Why is a schiff afraid to allow Biden, Eric Ciaramella, and others on The Republican list from testifying?

If Schiff has nothing to hide, he should allow all testimony.
This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
They aren't witnesses.
That's a conspiracy theory, not reality.

They are not witnesses.

Why are you tRumplings so mind-bogglingly stupid?
 

Nosmo King

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
24,403
Reaction score
5,961
Points
290
Location
Buckle of the Rust Belt
Outing the whistleblower is against the law.
No, it isn't.

But I understand you must protect fabricated lies and conspiracies at all costs.
There are statues protecting the identity of whistleblowers. But since when has adherence to the law been a priority for Trump and his minions?
 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
30,046
Reaction score
2,786
Points
1,140
They are all Material Fact Witnesses. So is Adam Schiff and he needs to be put in the hot seat and asked questions under oath.

The topic is corruption in The Ukraine and and Spies Leaking Classified Information, therefore anyone involved in that should be interviewed in public.

Why are you afraid of transparency and a fair process?

If you have nothing to hide, and want to get to the truth, you can’t intentionally avoid some
Facts and not others like Mueller did when he refused to investigate the origins of the Fake Russian Dirty Dossier.

Sure they are. Isn’t this about Hunter Biden”s Corruption amd about The President asking the Ukraine to keep The United States informed on the Status of an ongoing investigations in to Burisma, Soros and The Bidens that were re-opened 6 months prior to the call?

The Attorney General and President of Ukraine should also be interviewed, and so should Ciaramella and Biden, and The Ukraine Prosecutor who Biden got fired. Mueller also should be brought in since he referenced Ciaramella in his report.

If it’s important than all witnesses should be heard. If Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, he should testify. Trump Jr. had no problem testifying. Eric Ciaramella should testify.

This is an important federal hearing, not a place for you conservitards to air your crazy conspiracy theories.
They aren't witnesses.
That's a conspiracy theory, not reality.

They are not witnesses.

Why are you tRumplings so mind-bogglingly stupid?
No, they aren't. Imaginary corruption in the Ukraine is not the subject of the hearing.

No conspiracy theories allowed conservitards, run along and pester someone else now.
 

The Original Tree

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
27,520
Reaction score
5,052
Points
290
Location
OHIO
He is not a whistleblower. He had no first hand information. So He is a leaker of Classified information a fellow Spy leaked
To him and did not even get it right.

Thr transcript makes that clear that he is a Spy and nothing else and needs to be prosecuted under The Espionage Act.

Why are you afraid of transparency and a fair process. If no one has anything to hide, Achiff, Biden, and Ciaramella should testify.



Outing the whistleblower is against the law.
No, it isn't.

But I understand you must protect fabricated lies and conspiracies at all costs.
There are statues protecting the identity of whistleblowers. But since when has adherence to the law been a priority for Trump and his minions?
 

Billy_Bob

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
21,187
Reaction score
4,995
Points
1,010
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
Once it goes to the Senate - and it will - Schiff will become no more than an observer as the Senate takes him apart.
Graham has indicated that Schiff would be first on the witness list and followed by Caramillio.The trial will be over by the end of the first day on legal grounds..
 

Billy_Bob

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
21,187
Reaction score
4,995
Points
1,010
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
He is not a Whistleblower. He also leaked classified calls between The President and Mexico, Thailand and Australia, and when his access was restricted leaked 2nd hand classified information. These are CRIMES.

He committed Espionage and Treason and is hiding behind a fake Whistleblower Status. He is a traitor and coward.

Why aren’t you defending A REAL Whistleblower at ABC who was fired for complaining that ABC squashed a legit story about Epstein and Clinton raping little girls? She not only got fired, she got death threats and is now blackballed.

Why aren’t you defending her?
Plenty of others have testified confirming the whistleblower's complaint. Outing the whistleblower is against the law.

Democrats want to determine the facts. Republicans want to find out who ratted them out.
How do you KNOW who the whistleblower is?
Schiff outed him in testimony..
 

Nosmo King

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
24,403
Reaction score
5,961
Points
290
Location
Buckle of the Rust Belt
Plenty of others have testified confirming the whistleblower's complaint. Outing the whistleblower is against the law.

Democrats want to determine the facts. Republicans want to find out who ratted them out.
Why won't he testify? Does he have something to hide?
The story has been laid bare by the testimony of others, others who were on the call. The only reason Republicans want the whistleblowers testimony is to publically destroy him/her. We've seen this play before.

Trump wants his 'Lisa Page' for a new scandal.
 

Nosmo King

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
24,403
Reaction score
5,961
Points
290
Location
Buckle of the Rust Belt
He is not a whistleblower. He had no first hand information. So He is a leaker of Classified information a fellow Spy leaked
To him and did not even get it right.

Thr transcript makes that clear that he is a Spy and nothing else and needs to be prosecuted under The Espionage Act.

Why are you afraid of transparency and a fair process. If no one has anything to hide, Achiff, Biden, and Ciaramella should testify.



Outing the whistleblower is against the law.
No, it isn't.

But I understand you must protect fabricated lies and conspiracies at all costs.
There are statues protecting the identity of whistleblowers. But since when has adherence to the law been a priority for Trump and his minions?
Those people did not try to shakedown Ukraine.
 

New Posts

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top