Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a warrant and caught the guy. I personally didn’t like the process and am glad they righted you the rules but It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spinIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your postsIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?
The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)
Where’s trumps list?Obama Has Lost in the Supreme Court More Than Any Modern President
That pretty much sums up Obama's rulings by the Supreme Court...
Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spinIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your postsIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?
The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)
why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?So what’s your complaint about investigating Trump?Because Clinton committed the crime, not the investigation.
It's not an investigation, but a fiction collaboration intended to bring down an election.
Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.
Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.
Of policies ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court? You tell me, Slade! Of the cases that have made their way to the Supreme court...Trump has won both. That would be the travel ban and the diversion of funds to build the wall! Would you like to show me where he's lost?Where’s trumps list?Obama Has Lost in the Supreme Court More Than Any Modern President
That pretty much sums up Obama's rulings by the Supreme Court...
they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against RosenHaha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spinIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your postsIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?
The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)
Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!
You’re avoiding the topic again.why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?So what’s your complaint about investigating Trump?
It's not an investigation, but a fiction collaboration intended to bring down an election.
Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.
Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.
The Clintons are currently a protected species.
You’re avoiding the topic again.why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?It's not an investigation, but a fiction collaboration intended to bring down an election.
Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.
Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.
The Clintons are currently a protected species.
fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?
they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against RosenHaha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spinIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your postsIn order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?
The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)
Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!
wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the factsYou’re avoiding the topic again.why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?
Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.
Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.
The Clintons are currently a protected species.
fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?
He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against RosenHaha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spinHolder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your posts
The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)
Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!
Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.
He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against RosenHaha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spinThe OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)
Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!
Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.
well then good for you that neither are in power. Nice job diverting the conversation away from Trump btw. Much easier to attack than defend... I get itHe got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against RosenHaha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin
Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!
Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.
Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!
well then good for you that neither are in power. Nice job diverting the conversation away from Trump btw. Much easier to attack than defend... I get itHe got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against RosenHolder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!
Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.
Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!
wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the factsYou’re avoiding the topic again.why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.
Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.
The Clintons are currently a protected species.
fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?
Are you accusing Obama of procedural breaks or criminal acts?well then good for you that neither are in power. Nice job diverting the conversation away from Trump btw. Much easier to attack than defend... I get itHe got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen
Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.
Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!
Good for the whole country that Eric Holder isn't our Attorney General anymore.
As for what you now term a diversion? You accuse Trump of breaking the law and when I point out that he in fact hasn't broken the law but that Obama did so quite often...you label it a diversion? That's amusing.
wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the factsYou’re avoiding the topic again.why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?
The Clintons are currently a protected species.
fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?
I see I did a fly-by.
wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the factsYou’re avoiding the topic again.The Clintons are currently a protected species.
fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?
I see I did a fly-by.
You’re done Billy... go take a nap
wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the factsYou’re avoiding the topic again.
fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?
I see I did a fly-by.
You’re done Billy... go take a nap
I'm done, yet I am back. This is the logic you employ in all your posts.
Now run along, Calvin.
