Schiff directed Vindman not to answer certain questions from Republicans

[Slade3200]

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your posts

The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a warrant and caught the guy. I personally didn’t like the process and am glad they righted you the rules but It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

 

[Oldstyle]

Obama Has Lost in the Supreme Court More Than Any Modern President

That pretty much sums up Obama's rulings by the Supreme Court...

 

[Slade3200]

Obama Has Lost in the Supreme Court More Than Any Modern President

That pretty much sums up Obama's rulings by the Supreme Court...

Where’s trumps list?

 

[Oldstyle]

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your posts

The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Because Clinton committed the crime, not the investigation.

So what’s your complaint about investigating Trump?

It's not an investigation, but a fiction collaboration intended to bring down an election.

how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?

Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.

Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.

why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

 

[Oldstyle]

Obama Has Lost in the Supreme Court More Than Any Modern President

That pretty much sums up Obama's rulings by the Supreme Court...

Where’s trumps list?

Of policies ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court? You tell me, Slade! Of the cases that have made their way to the Supreme court...Trump has won both. That would be the travel ban and the diversion of funds to build the wall! Would you like to show me where he's lost?

 

[Slade3200]

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your posts

The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

 

[Slade3200]

So what’s your complaint about investigating Trump?

It's not an investigation, but a fiction collaboration intended to bring down an election.

how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?

Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.

Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.

why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It's not an investigation, but a fiction collaboration intended to bring down an election.

how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?

Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.

Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.

why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

 

[Oldstyle]

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

In order to believe that Barack Obama obeyed our laws...you have to believe that he didn't know that Holder OK'd wiretapping journalists...and OK'd running guns to Mexican narco terrorists. You'd have to believe that he didn't know that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. You'd have to believe he didn't know that his Secretary of State was running the State Department on a "pay to play" basis through illegal servers hidden in her home! So do you believe all of those things, Slade? Do you believe that Barack Obama...the so called "smartest man in the room"...didn't have a clue all of those things were going on?

Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your posts

The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.

 

[Slade3200]

how was it different from Clinton’s investigation prior to the perjury?

Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.

Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.

why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the facts

 

[Slade3200]

Holder doesn’t have the power to OK wiretaps, the court does and the court did. You need to work on accuracy in your posts

The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.

He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!

 

[Oldstyle]

The OK on applying for that wiretap came directly from Eric Holder! Are you now claiming that Obama's Attorney General didn't know what the FBI was doing? This is getting pathetic. Is there anyone in the Obama Administration who DID have a clue what was happening, Slade? (eye roll)

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.

He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!

Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!

 

[Slade3200]

Haha, man you are getting so thin from your stretches. If holder wiretapped without court approval then you’d have a point. But somebody was leaking national security secrets and he was going after them. He followed the legal process to apply for a war tent and caught the guy. It wasn’t illegal. That’s just spin

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.

He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!

Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!

well then good for you that neither are in power. Nice job diverting the conversation away from Trump btw. Much easier to attack than defend... I get it

 

[Oldstyle]

Holder wasn't going after the leaker...they were going after the reporter who was doing his job under the First Amendment! James Rosen was doing the EXACT same thing that Bernstein and Woodward were celebrated for doing!

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.

He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!

Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!

well then good for you that neither are in power. Nice job diverting the conversation away from Trump btw. Much easier to attack than defend... I get it

Good for the whole country that Eric Holder isn't our Attorney General anymore.

As for what you now term a diversion? You accuse Trump of breaking the law and when I point out that he in fact hasn't broken the law but that Obama did so quite often...you label it a diversion? That's amusing.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Clinton's behavior created a situation affecting national security by opening up the office of the presidency to foreign extortion/blackmail.

Accusations against Trump in the Democrats' attack are wholly fictional, based entirely on opportunistic opinions and interpretations designed by evil men.

why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the facts

I see I did a fly-by.

 

[Slade3200]

they were going after the release of classified information and they never filed charges against Rosen

Of course they never filed charges against Rosen! HE DIDN'T BREAK THE LAW AND THEY KNEW IT!!! You go after the person that did break the law...the leaker! What Obama and Holder did was a blatant end run around the Constitution.

He got intel that was illegally obtained and you are blaming holder for wanting to get the details about how and what was communicated?!

Yeah, it's that whole First Amendment of the Constitution thing! You know...freedom of the press? I blame Eric Holder for violating the First Amendment...something that he AND Barack Obama swore to uphold!

well then good for you that neither are in power. Nice job diverting the conversation away from Trump btw. Much easier to attack than defend... I get it

Good for the whole country that Eric Holder isn't our Attorney General anymore.

As for what you now term a diversion? You accuse Trump of breaking the law and when I point out that he in fact hasn't broken the law but that Obama did so quite often...you label it a diversion? That's amusing.

Are you accusing Obama of procedural breaks or criminal acts?

as for Trump, mueller outlined many instances of obstruction and the dems are making their case for his Ukraine actions. Whether any criminal charges are filed in the future or impeachment pursued... we shall see

 

[Slade3200]

why wasn’t Clinton impeached for the extortion/blackmail business?

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the facts

I see I did a fly-by.

You’re done Billy... go take a nap

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Clintons are currently a protected species.

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the facts

I see I did a fly-by.

You’re done Billy... go take a nap

I'm done, yet I am back. This is the logic you employ in all your posts.

Now run along, Calvin.

 

[Slade3200]

You’re avoiding the topic again.

fact is Clinton was investigated for whitewater and was impeached for perjury about having an affair. In Trumpland that would be called a witch-hunt. Right?

wow, now you’re down to emojis and YouTube videos?! Come on Billy I thought you were better than that. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and win an argument using the facts

I see I did a fly-by.

You’re done Billy... go take a nap

I'm done, yet I am back. This is the logic you employ in all your posts.

Now run along, Calvin.

Your argument is done smart guy, you abandoned it pages ago and continue to prove me right. Too easy