Scalise, Cole introduce resolution to change rules on impeachment

[Wry Catcher]

Democrats better be careful, Trump may declare the whole impeachment clause unconstitutional.

Oh, bullshit that'll never happen, only a megalomaniac would ever try to do that ... oops,

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Your're Crazy! Mueller is OVER! They were ALL open and a nothing burger. Trump IS stonewalling because they won't vote on the inquiry and open it up for ALL to see. You have EVERYTHING BACKWARDS! Read a newspaper and catch up!

The were numberous counts of obstruction of justice which were slam dunk prosecutions in the Mueller Report. Threatening witnesses via Twitter is frowned upon. But the Democrats need both the Grand Jury evidence or to interview the same witnesses who appeared before the Grand Jury in order to determine whether they have the evidence to impeach. The White House has stonewalled this investigation.

Then there's the stonewalling of the Oversight Committee's valid investigation of security clearances for White House staffers, wherein Trump has overridden legitimate security concerns for members of his family and his staff, and ordered clearances issued. There are a number of legitimate oversight issues, including emoluments in regard to the Trump Hotel Washington, but the White House has decided it will not cooperate with any oversight, even though obstruction of oversight is an impeachable offence.

The current impeachment hearings have nothing to do with Mueller and everything to do with the abuse of power in the Ukraine, which the President has confessed to, and then there's the legality of having the American Attorney General going around the world asking foreign security agencies to investigate the American FBI, CIA and NSA on behalf of the President. All of these investigations are based on conspiracy theories, and so far, none of Trump's conspiracy lies has ever been proven true.

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

Hate to break it to you but the President does not Obstruct Justice when he exercises a given right or power. He was free to fire Mueller at any time for any reason.

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Your're Crazy! Mueller is OVER! They were ALL open and a nothing burger. Trump IS stonewalling because they won't vote on the inquiry and open it up for ALL to see. You have EVERYTHING BACKWARDS! Read a newspaper and catch up!

The were numberous counts of obstruction of justice which were slam dunk prosecutions in the Mueller Report. Threatening witnesses via Twitter is frowned upon. But the Democrats need both the Grand Jury evidence or to interview the same witnesses who appeared before the Grand Jury in order to determine whether they have the evidence to impeach. The White House has stonewalled this investigation.

Then there's the stonewalling of the Oversight Committee's valid investigation of security clearances for White House staffers, wherein Trump has overridden legitimate security concerns for members of his family and his staff, and ordered clearances issued. There are a number of legitimate oversight issues, including emoluments in regard to the Trump Hotel Washington, but the White House has decided it will not cooperate with any oversight, even though obstruction of oversight is an impeachable offence.

The current impeachment hearings have nothing to do with Mueller and everything to do with the abuse of power in the Ukraine, which the President has confessed to, and then there's the legality of having the American Attorney General going around the world asking foreign security agencies to investigate the American FBI, CIA and NSA on behalf of the President. All of these investigations are based on conspiracy theories, and so far, none of Trump's conspiracy lies has ever been proven true.

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

So you have nothing? Thanks for sharing your ignorance. We are all stocked up on libtard stupid here. Try selling that shit somewhere else.

LOLOL

Actually, we don't even need that anymore. Now we have a president illegally soliciting foreign aid with his campaign. And quid pro quo according to his own chief of staff.

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Personally, I think it's time for the Republicans to DEMAND an open hearing and impeachment vote...

Let's see what kind of losing hand the Democrats have...

And watch them lose their FOURTH impeachment vote when the Democrats from the districts that voted for Trump vote AGAINST the farce in order protect their jobs!!!

First the Democrats have to investigate to prepare the articles of impeachment. The rest of the House gets involved when they have actual articles of impeachment.

Thank you so much for admitting that this is a Democrat plot (conducted behind closed doors), instead of a legitimate impeachment process conducted by the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (AS DEMANDED BY THE U S CONSTITUTION)!!!

And guess what???

The American voters can see through your partisan bullshit...

She isn't even a US citizen.

Is that true Dragonsnatch? Are you a foreigner? If so, what is your home land, and why are you here?

She is a Canadian busybody who apparently has no life.

 

[Faun]

The were numberous counts of obstruction of justice which were slam dunk prosecutions in the Mueller Report. Threatening witnesses via Twitter is frowned upon. But the Democrats need both the Grand Jury evidence or to interview the same witnesses who appeared before the Grand Jury in order to determine whether they have the evidence to impeach. The White House has stonewalled this investigation.

Then there's the stonewalling of the Oversight Committee's valid investigation of security clearances for White House staffers, wherein Trump has overridden legitimate security concerns for members of his family and his staff, and ordered clearances issued. There are a number of legitimate oversight issues, including emoluments in regard to the Trump Hotel Washington, but the White House has decided it will not cooperate with any oversight, even though obstruction of oversight is an impeachable offence.

The current impeachment hearings have nothing to do with Mueller and everything to do with the abuse of power in the Ukraine, which the President has confessed to, and then there's the legality of having the American Attorney General going around the world asking foreign security agencies to investigate the American FBI, CIA and NSA on behalf of the President. All of these investigations are based on conspiracy theories, and so far, none of Trump's conspiracy lies has ever been proven true.

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

Hate to break it to you but the President does not Obstruct Justice when he exercises a given right or power. He was free to fire Mueller at any time for any reason.

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

Hate to break it to you but the President does not Obstruct Justice when he exercises a given right or power. He was free to fire Mueller at any time for any reason.

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

Trump wanted him fired because of the obvious conflict of interest. Trumps orders were ignored. Sessions, in a tribute to his incompetence, did not realize that on his own, and besides, Mueller was never fired!

How incredibly stupid are you? Stop taking that question as a challenge! You have succeeded!

 

[Faun]

The were numberous counts of obstruction of justice which were slam dunk prosecutions in the Mueller Report. Threatening witnesses via Twitter is frowned upon. But the Democrats need both the Grand Jury evidence or to interview the same witnesses who appeared before the Grand Jury in order to determine whether they have the evidence to impeach. The White House has stonewalled this investigation.

Then there's the stonewalling of the Oversight Committee's valid investigation of security clearances for White House staffers, wherein Trump has overridden legitimate security concerns for members of his family and his staff, and ordered clearances issued. There are a number of legitimate oversight issues, including emoluments in regard to the Trump Hotel Washington, but the White House has decided it will not cooperate with any oversight, even though obstruction of oversight is an impeachable offence.

The current impeachment hearings have nothing to do with Mueller and everything to do with the abuse of power in the Ukraine, which the President has confessed to, and then there's the legality of having the American Attorney General going around the world asking foreign security agencies to investigate the American FBI, CIA and NSA on behalf of the President. All of these investigations are based on conspiracy theories, and so far, none of Trump's conspiracy lies has ever been proven true.

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

So you have nothing? Thanks for sharing your ignorance. We are all stocked up on libtard stupid here. Try selling that shit somewhere else.

LOLOL

Actually, we don't even need that anymore. Now we have a president illegally soliciting foreign aid with his campaign. And quid pro quo according to his own chief of staff.

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

 

[Faun]

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

Hate to break it to you but the President does not Obstruct Justice when he exercises a given right or power. He was free to fire Mueller at any time for any reason.

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

Trump wanted him fired because of the obvious conflict of interest. Trumps orders were ignored. Sessions, in a tribute to his incompetence, did not realize that on his own, and besides, Mueller was never fired!

How incredibly stupid are you? Stop taking that question as a challenge! You have succeeded!

Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so.

Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel.

Would you like me to post the relevant law again?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

So you have nothing? Thanks for sharing your ignorance. We are all stocked up on libtard stupid here. Try selling that shit somewhere else.

LOLOL

Actually, we don't even need that anymore. Now we have a president illegally soliciting foreign aid with his campaign. And quid pro quo according to his own chief of staff.

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Hate to break it to you but the President does not Obstruct Justice when he exercises a given right or power. He was free to fire Mueller at any time for any reason.

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

Trump wanted him fired because of the obvious conflict of interest. Trumps orders were ignored. Sessions, in a tribute to his incompetence, did not realize that on his own, and besides, Mueller was never fired!

How incredibly stupid are you? Stop taking that question as a challenge! You have succeeded!

Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so.

Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel.

Would you like me to post the relevant law again?

One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted. If he does not, the President can then simply fire the Attorney General, which he eventually did, for being a spineless bastard, and not because he did not fire Mueller. He could then appoint another Attorney General who could then fire the Special Prosecutor. I guess Watergate was before your time, or else you would not be this fucking dense.

I guess your reading skills will improve with more experience and eventually you might achieve proficiency when you finally reach high school level instruction.

 

[Faun]

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

So you have nothing? Thanks for sharing your ignorance. We are all stocked up on libtard stupid here. Try selling that shit somewhere else.

LOLOL

Actually, we don't even need that anymore. Now we have a president illegally soliciting foreign aid with his campaign. And quid pro quo according to his own chief of staff.

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

LOLOL

Your delusions are noted and laughed at. Roberts is the new Kennedy. He's not about to be biased by throwing out evidence you think is pesky.

 

[Faun]

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

Trump wanted him fired because of the obvious conflict of interest. Trumps orders were ignored. Sessions, in a tribute to his incompetence, did not realize that on his own, and besides, Mueller was never fired!

How incredibly stupid are you? Stop taking that question as a challenge! You have succeeded!

Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so.

Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel.

Would you like me to post the relevant law again?

One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted. If he does not, the President can then simply fire the Attorney General, which he eventually did, for being a spineless bastard, and not because he did not fire Mueller. He could then appoint another Attorney General who could then fire the Special Prosecutor. I guess Watergate was before your time, or else you would not be this fucking dense.

I guess your reading skills will improve with more experience and eventually you might achieve proficiency when you finally reach high school level instruction.

"One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted."

Aww, you poor thing. Bless your heart. You really don't understand what I said, do you? I already pointed out the president can ask his Attorney General to fire a Special Counsel. I also pointed out the president can't fire the Special Counsel and that his Attorney General does not have to fire the Special Counsel just because a president asks him/her to. Here I am, telk you what you just said to me as though I didn't already say this...

"Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so. Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel." ~ Faun​

Deal with it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So you have nothing? Thanks for sharing your ignorance. We are all stocked up on libtard stupid here. Try selling that shit somewhere else.

LOLOL

Actually, we don't even need that anymore. Now we have a president illegally soliciting foreign aid with his campaign. And quid pro quo according to his own chief of staff.

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

LOLOL

Your delusions are noted and laughed at. Roberts is the new Kennedy. He's not about to be biased by throwing out evidence you think is pesky.

It is not "pesky". It is hear-say, pure and simple.

Once again, you prove you are an ignorant POS loudmouth with no education.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

Trump wanted him fired because of the obvious conflict of interest. Trumps orders were ignored. Sessions, in a tribute to his incompetence, did not realize that on his own, and besides, Mueller was never fired!

How incredibly stupid are you? Stop taking that question as a challenge! You have succeeded!

Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so.

Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel.

Would you like me to post the relevant law again?

One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted. If he does not, the President can then simply fire the Attorney General, which he eventually did, for being a spineless bastard, and not because he did not fire Mueller. He could then appoint another Attorney General who could then fire the Special Prosecutor. I guess Watergate was before your time, or else you would not be this fucking dense.

I guess your reading skills will improve with more experience and eventually you might achieve proficiency when you finally reach high school level instruction.

"One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted."

Aww, you poor thing. Bless your heart. You really don't understand what I said, do you? I already pointed out the president can ask his Attorney General to fire a Special Counsel. I also pointed out the president can't fire the Special Counsel and that his Attorney General does not have to fire the Special Counsel just because a president asks him/her to. Here I am, telk you what you just said to me as though I didn't already say this...

"Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so. Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel." ~ Faun​

Deal with it.

You need to deal with the fact that you have been schooled and just need to say "Yes, sir!", STFU and open your textbook to the section on the Constitution.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Actually, we don't even need that anymore. Now we have a president illegally soliciting foreign aid with his campaign. And quid pro quo according to his own chief of staff.

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

LOLOL

Your delusions are noted and laughed at. Roberts is the new Kennedy. He's not about to be biased by throwing out evidence you think is pesky.

It is not "pesky". It is hear-say, pure and simple.

Once again, you prove you are an ignorant POS loudmouth with no education.

It's not hearsay, you dumb fucking idiot. Taylor testified today about conversations he had. Not about conversations he heard about. He testified about notifying the Secretary of State about his concerns. Not that he heard Pompeo was notified .
At least try not to be a demented freak.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Except for the fact, dumbass, he never said what you think he said, and there is no proof of any of your ridiculous allegations.

Remind me again, what year will you graduate from high school? I know middle school is tough but maybe you'll make it out by the time you get to be 16. Most schools don't allow kids to drive to middle school.

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

LOLOL

Your delusions are noted and laughed at. Roberts is the new Kennedy. He's not about to be biased by throwing out evidence you think is pesky.

It is not "pesky". It is hear-say, pure and simple.

Once again, you prove you are an ignorant POS loudmouth with no education.

It's not hearsay, you dumb fucking idiot. Taylor testified today about conversations he had. Not about conversations he heard about. He testified about notifying the Secretary of State about his concerns. Not that he heard Pompeo was notified .
At least try not to be a demented freak.

How do you know this? Were you in the hearing? Why does his testimony conflict with the tweets he received from Sondland? He has no proof of these conversations but Sondland has the tweets they exchanged. That doesn't say much for his claims.

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOLOLOL

No proof of quid pro quo??

5 separate people testified before Congress indicating you're brain-dead; culminating with yesterday's testimony. So damning, even rightwing Fox news had to report on it...

Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes

Lock him up!

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

LOLOL

Your delusions are noted and laughed at. Roberts is the new Kennedy. He's not about to be biased by throwing out evidence you think is pesky.

It is not "pesky". It is hear-say, pure and simple.

Once again, you prove you are an ignorant POS loudmouth with no education.

It's not hearsay, you dumb fucking idiot. Taylor testified today about conversations he had. Not about conversations he heard about. He testified about notifying the Secretary of State about his concerns. Not that he heard Pompeo was notified .
At least try not to be a demented freak.

How do you know this? Were you in the hearing? Why does his testimony conflict with the tweets he received from Sondland? He has no proof of these conversations but Sondland has the tweets they exchanged. That doesn't say much for his claims.

Dumbfucking cuck, they released 15 pages of Taylor's opening testimony -- that's how I know.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? Just how mentally retarded are you?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He also testified that he was given that information from his fellow diplomat who already testified before Congress and said it didn't happen. You need to stop reading only the leaks from your libtard Congressman and pay attention to what is really going on. Those 5 libtards all had reasons to go after Trump. They provided hear-say evidence that will not stand up in court.

Go ahead and hold the vote! See how well the Senate trial goes when the Chief Justice throws out all of your so-called "evidence" as being hear-say and starts charging the House managers with contempt.

LOLOL

Your delusions are noted and laughed at. Roberts is the new Kennedy. He's not about to be biased by throwing out evidence you think is pesky.

It is not "pesky". It is hear-say, pure and simple.

Once again, you prove you are an ignorant POS loudmouth with no education.

It's not hearsay, you dumb fucking idiot. Taylor testified today about conversations he had. Not about conversations he heard about. He testified about notifying the Secretary of State about his concerns. Not that he heard Pompeo was notified .
At least try not to be a demented freak.

How do you know this? Were you in the hearing? Why does his testimony conflict with the tweets he received from Sondland? He has no proof of these conversations but Sondland has the tweets they exchanged. That doesn't say much for his claims.

Dumbfucking cuck, they released 15 pages of Taylor's opening testimony -- that's how I know.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? Just how mentally retarded are you?

Did he address the obvious conflict between his statements and those of Sondland? If not, his testimony is worthless.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If what you claim is true (which it isn't), why did Mueller testify before Congress that no one obstructed hi investigation?

BTW, that "numerous counts" comes from a DNC talking point that has no basis in reality because no one has ever compiled a list of those "counts".

All we have is to suffer your unending stream of libtard bullshit!

Mueller said no attempts to obstruct his investigation were successful. And of course, obstruction of justice is still a crime even if attempts to obstruct are unsuccessful.

Hate to break it to you but the President does not Obstruct Justice when he exercises a given right or power. He was free to fire Mueller at any time for any reason.

As always, you are woefully misinformed.

28 CFR § 600.7

The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies.​

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

He can tell the Attorney General to do it shit for brains.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Once again you prove without a doubt that you have shit for brains.

Who does the attorney general work for? There was a definitive conflict of interest in that Mueller was wanting the job as FBI Director and then was turned down and magically was appointed as Special Prosecutor the very next fucking day, dumbass!

It doesn't get any bigger conflict of interest than that!

Dumbfuck, no Attorney General has to fire a Special Counsel at the whim of the president. Now you're merely projecting about having shit for brains as I just proved the president can't fire a Special Counsel despite your vacuous objections.

Trump wanted him fired because of the obvious conflict of interest. Trumps orders were ignored. Sessions, in a tribute to his incompetence, did not realize that on his own, and besides, Mueller was never fired!

How incredibly stupid are you? Stop taking that question as a challenge! You have succeeded!

Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so.

Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel.

Would you like me to post the relevant law again?

One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted. If he does not, the President can then simply fire the Attorney General, which he eventually did, for being a spineless bastard, and not because he did not fire Mueller. He could then appoint another Attorney General who could then fire the Special Prosecutor. I guess Watergate was before your time, or else you would not be this fucking dense.

I guess your reading skills will improve with more experience and eventually you might achieve proficiency when you finally reach high school level instruction.

"One more time shit for brains, he can instruct the Attorney General to fire the special prosecutor for conflict of interest as specified in the law you posted."

Aww, you poor thing. Bless your heart. You really don't understand what I said, do you? I already pointed out the president can ask his Attorney General to fire a Special Counsel. I also pointed out the president can't fire the Special Counsel and that his Attorney General does not have to fire the Special Counsel just because a president asks him/her to. Here I am, telk you what you just said to me as though I didn't already say this...

"Trump's "orders" to fire a Special Counsel have no teeth as he can't force the Attorney General to do so. Again, the part you're too dense to comprehend.... a president cannot fire a Special Counsel." ~ Faun​

Deal with it.

It is not obstruction if he orders the AG to fire him. No matter what the AG does. Ohh and the AG serves at the pleasure of the President so firing him is not obstruction either.