"SAY GOODBYE REPUBLICANS" if you pull this shit, might as well eliminate the party...

Lets hope this is the New York Times doing their part to kill off the GOP


Oh, I think the GOP is doing that all on it's own.

The GOP has moved into a dwindling number of Red States with low electoral votes. They cannot win any urban area and rely on gerrymander and redistricting to maintain their power at the state level

That is their base. It cannot be expanded without an expansion of the Republican platform



This analysis makes your point painfully clear:

Statistikhengst's ELECTORAL POLITICS - 2013 and beyond: ELECTORAL COLUMNS - a map display

Y'all, to to the link and see the maps for yourself.

But this is the critical part:

1992-2012+-+the+6ers.png



Those are the states that have gone 6-for-6 for their respective party. Using the electoral allocation based on the 2010 census, the low-point for the Democratic party is 242 EV, for the GOP, 102.

Add in the 5-of-6ers to the 6-of-6ers and you get this:

1992-2012+-+the+6ers+plus+5+of+6ers.png


D 257 / R 158 - margin: D +99

Read the rest, cool stats from the gilded age and some very obvious parallels.

The "Clinton 6" are also in this analysis.
 
Last edited:
The only reasonable immigration reform is mass deportation of all illegal aliens + a stoppage of all legal immigration, until it is needed. (when US unemployment is zero, and there are more jobs than job seekers)

Even if this were the case, the many other harms of immigration would all have to be taken into account and weighed as well. It's hard to see how immigration could be beneficial to America, when we are already so horribly overpopulated.

Harms of Immigration

1. Americans lose jobs. (especially Whites due to affirmative action).

2. Wage reduction.

3. Tax $ lost (due to off books work + lower wages paid).

4. Remittance $$$ lost. ($40 Billion year).

5. Tax $$ lost to immigrants on welfare.

6. Increased crime.

7. Increased traffic congestion.

8. Increased pollution.

9. Overcrowding in hospital ERs.

10. Overcrowding in recreational facilities.

11. Overcrowding in government offices.

12. Overcrowding in schools.

13. Decrease in funds available for entitlements.

14. Cultural erosion.

15. Overuse of scarce resources (oil, gasoline, fresh water, jobs, electricity, food, etc)

16. Introduction of foreign diseases.

Like herding cats

The immigrants are here. They are working

Give them a work visa, Make them pay taxes, make them follow the laws, if they are good citizens make them permanent

This is insanity. So you're OK with all these 16 HARMS to the American people ? With friends like you, the American people don't need enemies.

Was it "insanity" when the nation started?

This is a nation of immigrants. What we have now is people that want to slam the door making the rules on immigration.

The process we now have in place is completely nuts.

And makes no sense whatsoever.

If you are rich you can buy your way into citizenship..but poor folks are barred?

That's nuts.
 
Oh, I think the GOP is doing that all on it's own.

The GOP has moved into a dwindling number of Red States with low electoral votes. They cannot win any urban area and rely on gerrymander and redistricting to maintain their power at the state level

That is their base. It cannot be expanded without an expansion of the Republican platform



This analysis makes your point painfully clear:

Statistikhengst's ELECTORAL POLITICS - 2013 and beyond: ELECTORAL COLUMNS - a map display

Y'all, to to the link and see the maps for yourself.

But this is the critical part:

1992-2012+-+the+6ers.png



Those are the states that have gone 6-for-6 for their respective party. Using the electoral allocation based on the 2010 census, the low-point for the Democratic party is 242 EV, for the GOP, 102.

Add in the 5-of-6ers to the 6-of-6ers and you get this:

1992-2012+-+the+6ers+plus+5+of+6ers.png


D 257 / R 158 - margin: D +99

Read the rest, cool stats from the gilded age and some very obvious parallels.

The "Clinton 6" are also in this analysis.

It all comes down to population density

People who live in densely populated areas want and need government services....schools, roads, mass transit, social programs ...they tend to vote Democratic

People who live in remote areas don't want those things. They do want farm subsidies, more defense spending...they tend to vote Republican
 
.

I clearly am missing something when it comes to this topic. Here's what I'd like to see, someone please tell me why it's so terrible:
  • If you're here, you get guest worker status. You can work and you pay our taxes.
  • When you get guest worker status, you go to the back of the immigration line.
  • Your kids have the same status.
  • You work (kids go to school) while you're waiting your turn.
  • When you reach the front of the line, you're in.
This seems so simple. What am I missing?

.

[MENTION=34298]Mac1958[/MENTION] makes some very solid and interesting points.

I want to tell you all two different small stories:

My mentor, with whom I apprenticed many, many years ago, is an arch-Conservative. He is a damned fine person with very, very strict Conservative beliefs. In terms of beliefs, he and I are like night and day.

Ca. 7 years ago, when then President Bush, Jr. tried to push immigration reform through, my mentor was visiting me, we met up not far from Vienna. Over a bottle of wine, as I asked him what he thought about this all, he, an arch-Conservative, said the following to me:

1.) It's a shitty situation, built on the backs of both parties.
2.) Illegal aliens have built a shadow economy that would better serve our economy were it to come into the open.
3.) Most illegal aliens do jobs that most Americans don't want to do.
4.) Most illegal aliens come from catholic backgrounds and tend to have a more Conservative worldview, at least at the onset.
5.) It would cost far more to root them all up and send them back than to find a way to incorporate them into the Union.
6.) If the GOP doesn't do it, one day there will be a DEM president and the DEMS will do it and then they will get the credit.

And those words came from the mouth of an arch conservative. 7 years ago. Pretty prophetic stuff.

Second story:

A man I worked with for a while, a guy who did administrative stuff, once told me that whenever he had to do some kind of disciplinary process on someone, it was always a matter of discerning between intent and perception. In other words, a person who may have screwed up badly may intend one thing, but it will be perceived in another way.

And so it is with the GOP. Do I think that most Republicans hate immigrants, esp. illegal immigrants? NO, I don't.

But there are just enough GOP freaks out there who have had access to a microphone or TV interview, who have said batshit crazy things about illegal immigrants - and let's be clear here: in almost every case they are talking about Latinos - and automatically linking LEGAL immigrants who are Latinos with illegal immigrants. And that is where the GOP shoots itself in the foot every day over this issue. Every single day.

So, even if many, many Republicans don't intend it, it sure as hell is being perceived that way. Mitt Romney was forced to shoot himself in the foot with the "self-deportation" thing in order to assuage the extreme-right of the GOP and those words came back to bite him squarely in the ass in the fall.

Now, back to you, Mac: I see no problem with your ideas. But be careful about the children part. Kids born here, irrespective of the nationality of their parents at that time, are US citizens.

[MENTION=28109]Amelia[/MENTION] makes the point - and correctly so imo, that, if we don't completely, hermetically seal the border (meaning, the Texas / Mexico border), then in 20 years, we will be right back where we are now. Please remember that the Obama administration has put more boots on the ground at the border than any other administration and the Obama adminstration has deported more illegal immigrants than any other, but that is not enough. We may have to build an electronic - and - physical fence, along the entire stretch, without exception.

My advice to the GOP would be to take part in this, for it is going to happen, anyway. If the GOP kills immigration reform once more, polling is already showing that the Latinos will simply give up on the GOP. There were already strong indications of this in 2012. Latinos really, really liked Bill Clinton. They are going to be crazy for Hillary, mark my word, and if she selects a Latino as her running mate, and I suspect she may just do that, then the sleeping bear that is the Latino vote will awaken.

What is not acceptable is the excuse on the part of GOPer that Latinos will never vote GOP and so, "**** 'em". Really?

President George W. Bush, Jr, got 45% of the Latino vote. A real GOP outreach could possibly bring the GOP more, but the situation is absolutely hopeless for the GOP so long as it continues to demonize Latinos, plain and simple. Whether or not it is intended, it is being perceived so. And as long as you have assholes like Rep. King from Iowa talking about Latino drug-dealing teenagers with calves the size of melons or a total whackazoid like Tommy Tancredo calling for literacy tests for LEGAL immigrants to be able to vote whilst also saying that we should nuke Mecca, or Louis Gohmert babbling on and on and on about El Quaida getting in bed with Mexicans so as to smuggle over "anchor babies" who will then grow up to blow up our cities - as long as your team has these kind of absolutely batshit crazy nutz going around doing this kind of shit, the Latino community will never, ever trust you.

I also would like to know why Republicans are so damned defeatist about their chances at recruiting Latinos into the GOP. Were the Congress to adopt Obama's proposal from LAST YEAR, then that would mean at least 12 years would have to pass before the first illegal aliens would be naturalized, which means that they would probably first vote in the 2028 elections. Does anyone think that the GOP is SOOOO paralyzed that it cannot convince Latinos on the battlefield of ideas that maybe their party is better, when they would have about 14 years to get the job done? Really?

Had Republicans been that defeatist in 1980, then the Reagan Revolution would never have happened, for Reagan brought people into the GOP whom most GOPers thought would never sign-up.

So, those were my two cents.

[MENTION=20412]JakeStarkey[/MENTION] [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:
President George W. Bush, Jr, got 45% of the Latino vote. A real GOP outreach could possibly bring the GOP more, but the situation is absolutely hopeless for the GOP so long as it continues to demonize Latinos, plain and simple. Whether or not it is intended, it is being perceived so. And as long as you have assholes like Rep. King from Iowa talking about Latino drug-dealing teenagers with calves the size of melons or a total whackazoid like Tommy Tancredo calling for literacy tests for LEGAL immigrants to be able to vote whilst also saying that we should nuke Mecca, or Louis Gohmert babbling on and on and on about El Quaida getting in bed with Mexicans so as to smuggle over "anchor babies" who will then grow up to blow up our cities - as long as your team has these kind of absolutely batshit crazy nutz going around doing this kind of shit, the Latino community will never, ever trust you.

That is a key point. It goes beyond the "free stuff" the Republicans keep babbling about. It comes down to respect

Minorities read what is posted on the internet. They hear what the talking heads on rightwing hate radio say. They hear the code words from politicians

They ask.....Is this the party I want to belong to?
 
Meh, the stupidity if the American voter, who put the left in charge of things is responsible for the ruination of this country. It is more than likely irrepairably damaged. I say let it collapse on the democrat party's watch. They completely deserve the blame. I kind of pity the young since they will suffer the most but hey, much of it is their fault.
 
Meh, the stupidity if the American voter, who put the left in charge of things is responsible for the ruination of this country. It is more than likely irrepairably damaged. I say let it collapse on the democrat party's watch. They completely deserve the blame. I kind of pity the young since they will suffer the most but hey, much of it is their fault.

Republicans are not giving the American voter much reason to vote for them

In actuality, they are giving them many reasons not to vote for them
 
President George W. Bush, Jr, got 45% of the Latino vote. A real GOP outreach could possibly bring the GOP more, but the situation is absolutely hopeless for the GOP so long as it continues to demonize Latinos, plain and simple. Whether or not it is intended, it is being perceived so. And as long as you have assholes like Rep. King from Iowa talking about Latino drug-dealing teenagers with calves the size of melons or a total whackazoid like Tommy Tancredo calling for literacy tests for LEGAL immigrants to be able to vote whilst also saying that we should nuke Mecca, or Louis Gohmert babbling on and on and on about El Quaida getting in bed with Mexicans so as to smuggle over "anchor babies" who will then grow up to blow up our cities - as long as your team has these kind of absolutely batshit crazy nutz going around doing this kind of shit, the Latino community will never, ever trust you.

That is a key point. It goes beyond the "free stuff" the Republicans keep babbling about. It comes down to respect

Minorities read what is posted on the internet. They hear what the talking heads on rightwing hate radio say. They hear the code words from politicians

They ask.....Is this the party I want to belong to?



Exactly.

Intent - Perception.


It's really that simple.
 
President George W. Bush, Jr, got 45% of the Latino vote. A real GOP outreach could possibly bring the GOP more, but the situation is absolutely hopeless for the GOP so long as it continues to demonize Latinos, plain and simple. Whether or not it is intended, it is being perceived so. And as long as you have assholes like Rep. King from Iowa talking about Latino drug-dealing teenagers with calves the size of melons or a total whackazoid like Tommy Tancredo calling for literacy tests for LEGAL immigrants to be able to vote whilst also saying that we should nuke Mecca, or Louis Gohmert babbling on and on and on about El Quaida getting in bed with Mexicans so as to smuggle over "anchor babies" who will then grow up to blow up our cities - as long as your team has these kind of absolutely batshit crazy nutz going around doing this kind of shit, the Latino community will never, ever trust you.

That is a key point. It goes beyond the "free stuff" the Republicans keep babbling about. It comes down to respect

Minorities read what is posted on the internet. They hear what the talking heads on rightwing hate radio say. They hear the code words from politicians

They ask.....Is this the party I want to belong to?



Exactly.

Intent - Perception.


It's really that simple.

And in the end...it is all unnecessary

Republicans can tell their pundits to STFU. They are hurting the party brand and driving people away
 
Some points to make:

(1) anyone who discounts the strength of the voting public discounts what makes America great and good when that happens

(2) some to the far right in my party don't want to share power with people of color or from immigrant backgrounds

(3) the GOP will continue its road to being a minority party if it does not reach out to Hispanics, immigrants, and women

(4) the framing of our language must be non-confrontational in pursuit of #3 (yes, Huckabee framed his comments about Democrats, women, contraception, and sluts stupidly if ignorantly)
 
Some points to make:

(1) anyone who discounts the strength of the voting public discounts what makes America great and good when that happens

(2) some to the far right in my party don't want to share power with people of color or from immigrant backgrounds

(3) the GOP will continue its road to being a minority party if it does not reach out to Hispanics, immigrants, and women

(4) the framing of our language must be non-confrontational in pursuit of #3 (yes, Huckabee framed his comments about Democrats, women, contraception, and sluts stupidly if ignorantly)

Yeah, I just don't get the slut thing at all. I mean, I assume that most GOP men are married and know what kind of wrath a woman can have (and rightly so) when called such. Calling women "sluts" when you want their vote is a little like when someone throws you a left hook and you lean in, right?

Wow... just wow.
 
The sensible start to fixing our immigration situation is to push for the Dream Act. If I were Reince Priebus I would make that part of the party's national campaign this year. Give the ones who were brought here as children the opportunity to earn their citizenship through either four years of military service or a trade school or college degree. I mean, those are the kind of people we want here in the first place, people with education and military experience who have proven they will be able to pull their own weight and not mooch off the system. This really should be a no-brainer for the GOP and when the hardliners start complaining they can tell them to eat shit. It's morally the right thing to do and definitely the Christian thing to do.

After this is done then you start determining how to deal with the millions of others already here who don't fall under the Dream Act and you also start working to relax our immigration laws. Frankly, anybody who wants to come here and work should be able to without hassle. They aren't going to take jobs away from native born Americans. The market will work that out. If there is nowhere for the immigrants to work they simply won't come.
 
Last edited:
Some points to make:

(1) anyone who discounts the strength of the voting public discounts what makes America great and good when that happens

(2) some to the far right in my party don't want to share power with people of color or from immigrant backgrounds

(3) the GOP will continue its road to being a minority party if it does not reach out to Hispanics, immigrants, and women

(4) the framing of our language must be non-confrontational in pursuit of #3 (yes, Huckabee framed his comments about Democrats, women, contraception, and sluts stupidly if ignorantly)

Republican need to concentrate on what they do best....fiscal restraint

When they stray into social issues they start to run into problems. They need to stop the offensive rhetoric. They need to reprimand those who engage in it. They need to hold off the attacks on those members of their party who differ on nonconsequential issues. A Republican can believe in global warming and still be a Republican. A Republican can support gay marriage and still be a Republican
 
After this is done then you start determining how to deal with the millions of others already here who don't fall under the Dream Act and you also start working to relax our immigration laws. .



We don't need to "relax" our immigration laws, we need to enforce them. When we really do that, then we can start working on other related issues.
 
15th post
One thing is for sure. . . .

Why in the world would the GOP take advice about what to do or how to handle things from the leftists/statists/progressives/political class/liberals/Jake Starkey? Do you really think they have any interest in giving the GOP good advice?
 
One thing is for sure. . . .

Why in the world would the GOP take advice about what to do or how to handle things from the leftists/statists/progressives/political class/liberals/Jake Starkey? Do you really think they have any interest in giving the GOP good advice?

I still have not seen any Republican responses as to their plan of action regarding their diminishing support among Hispanics

What is your advice? You are usually pretty good at it
 
Foxfyre does not like that mainstream Republicans, such as myself, have no use for the damage the far right reactionaries and libertarians have done to the party since 2009.

I am in line with the RNC, not the nutjobs.

So let's work on fiscal restraint and get out of the culture and religious wars, Republicans.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom