Zone1 Savages continuing to be savages. I guess when the last savage is alive, then the shootings will stop.

[Mikeoxenormous]

Three days. 10 mass shootings. More than 50 victims. US sees worst weekend of 2023.

Five people were injured near a parade in New Orleans.
Six people were shot on a Chicago expressway.
That's just half of the reported mass shooting violence over the weekend.
There were 10 mass shootings from Feb. 17 through Feb. 19 – the most of any weekend so far this year, according to data from the Gun Violence Archive. That’s considering all shootings from Friday to Sunday in which four or more people were shot, not including the shooter or shooters.

When people arent allowed to defend themselves and must rely on the police for safety, the defund the police movement by the Marxists, well, just made it less safe for the law abiding citizens. This is why under Joe Biteme, he, Joe has out done his boss, Gun Salesman of the 2010s, Barrack Hussain Obammy.

Gun industry declares Biden salesman of the year

President Joe Biden has seen almost as many gun sales during his first year in office than his two predecessors combined.

bearingarms.com

 

[Moonglow]

Questions of Police Duty
The answer is no. In the 1981 case Warren v. District of Columbia, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that police have a general "public duty," but that "no specific legal duty exists" unless there is a special relationship between an officer and an individual, such as a person in custody.Jun 14, 2022

Do the Police Have an Obligation to Protect You? - FindLaw​

 

[Moonglow]

Police Have No Duty to Protect You, Federal Court Affirms Yet ...​

https://mises.org › power-market › police-have-no-duty...


The US Supreme Court has made it clear that law enforcement agencies are not required to provide protection to the citizens who are forced to pay the police ...
You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 2/17/23

People also ask

 

[longly]

Police Have No Duty to Protect You, Federal Court Affirms Yet ...​

https://mises.org › power-market › police-have-no-duty...


The US Supreme Court has made it clear that law enforcement agencies are not required to provide protection to the citizens who are forced to pay the police ...
You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 2/17/23

People also ask

The unfortunate reality is that the police do not have the ability to protect individuals. They protect society by enforcing the laws made by lawmakers. Even if all guns were eliminated, the individual citizen would still be at risk of abuse by criminals. The criminal always had the advantage; he could choose the time and place of his attack and attack either one on one or in a group. The individual who has no means of self-defense is just a potential victim; of course, it makes a big difference where one lives; some areas are much safer than others.

 

[1srelluc]

Stay strapped and keep your strong hand free.

 

[AZrailwhale]

The unfortunate reality is that the police do not have the ability to protect individuals. They protect society by enforcing the laws made by lawmakers. Even if all guns were eliminated, the individual citizen would still be at risk of abuse by criminals. The criminal always had the advantage; he could choose the time and place of his attack and attack either one on one or in a group. The individual who has no means of self-defense is just a potential victim; of course, it makes a big difference where one lives; some areas are much safer than others.

There were thieves, rapists and murderers long before firearms existed. Getting rid of guns will not make a dent in crime. The only result would be the criminals shifting weapons.

 

[Meister]

Thread closed, this doesn't comply with Zone 1 rules