True that....
But how the fuk could George Bush suck up to the Saudis after 9-11?
That was disgusting
-------------------------------------- heard it explained today on El Rushbo . THERE was conversation between Rush and another Conservative Gent named Willian F. Buckley that is now dead and the Conversation was about Saudi complicity in 9 -11 . Anyway the reasoning went that the Saudi --- 'FAMILY' --- did not do anything concerning 9 -11 . It may have been Saudi citizens involved in 9 -11 but it was not the Saudi --- 'Royal FAMILY' --- that was involved . This is the reasoning that allowed 'gwb' to embrace the Saudis according to Rush in a conversation with William F. Buckley that they had years ago RWinger .
Well IRAQ had NOTHING to do with September 11 at all but GWB and Dick Cheney and Co. were out there linking 911 and Saddam Hussein in the SAME sentence to brainwash the gullible idiots into supporting bombing Iraq and getting rid of Saddam because of September 11.
Show me a link showing Bush or Cheney saying any such thing! You bought into the media lies I see.
Yes I thought you were one of those arrogant Know It All Quasi-Leftist Teachers who know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING yet you cannot use Google to find the answer to my ACCURATE comment of:
"Well IRAQ had NOTHING to do with September 11 at all but GWB and Dick Cheney and Co. were out there linking 911 and Saddam Hussein in the SAME sentence to brainwash the gullible idiots into supporting bombing Iraq and getting rid of Saddam because of September 11."
It is not black and white as Saddam Hussein planned September 11, it is more nuanced than that and subliminal, the message right AFTER 9/11 and the lead up to the invasion of Iraq that those watching what GWB, Cheney etc were commenting were not in general taking in the in-between sections they would ONLY be hearing:
9/11, Saddam Hussein, September 11, Saddam Hussein, 9/11, Iraq, September 11, Iraq and THIS would connect in enough gullible minds Saddam Hussein with September 11.
Well Ben Carson agrees with me re. GWB linking Saddam with 9/11 as the final desperate basis to launch the POINTLESS invasion of Iraq:
Here's Donald Trump The Candidate attacking GWB on September 11 and the Iraq War and The Donald is correct the Iraq War WAS a mistake but it was a deliberate mistake, Trump also said that GWB LIED, that there were NO WMD and that GWB should have been Impeached and then Jeb Bush babbles the usual crap that your type probably still think that GWB did a GREAT thing invading Iraq etc.
With this it could have you in a dilemma because in order to DEFEND GWB and the invasion of Iraq and the handling of 9/11 then you will have to ATTACK Donald Trump:
Dick Cheney from his OWN mouth linking 9/11 to Saddam Hussein so he can push the invasion of Iraq and Regime Change thing:
"In the post 9/11 era, certain risks are unacceptable. The United States made our position clear - we could not accept the grave danger of Saddam Hussein and his terrorist allies turning weapons of mass destruction against us or our friends and allies. And gradually we are learning the details of this hidden weapons programme."
"Some claim we should not have acted because the threat from Saddam Hussein was not imminent. Yet as the president has said, since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike. I would remind the critics of the fundamental case the president made since September 11th. Terrorist enemies of our country hope to strike us with the most lethal weapons known to man, and it would be reckless in the extreme to rule out action and save our worries until the day they strike."
Better not forget this gem Donald Rumsfeld in 1983 shaking hands and having a nice meeting with Saddam Hussein when he was America's Friend before he outlived his usefulness as an American Puppet and then had to be Regime Changed: