Sarah Palin being considered for Secretary of Veterans Affairs

[Faun]

We're at full employment no matter how you try to spin it. Trump was elected because America didn't have enough trust and confidence in Hillary. As far as Obama, his job approval rating is as high as Reagan's was at this point in his presidency.

Who was polled to determine his job approval? How many americans? where do they live? Give us the stats of the poll or STFU

Here ya go, contact Gallup for those details...

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval

1500 people out of 330,000,000. Gallop also predicted that HRC would win and that there was no path to 270 EC votes for Trump.

you are free to buy this shit if you want, but the election of novermber 2016 proved that the pollsters are both biased and incompetent.

LOLOL

You're lying again ... post Gallup's election poll numbers......

have you been under a rock for the last few months?

Stop stalling and post Gallup's election poll numbers.....

 

[Faun]

Discuss what you want, but the fact remains -- 4.9% unemployment, 72 consecutive months of job growth, and a record high stock market is not the definition of a mess.

If you want to see what a mess looks like, look at the end of 2008 and early 2009 when unemployment was 7.8% and growing, over million people became unemployed in January, 2009, and the stock market lost half of its valuation.

Jobs are SO GOOD that America rushed to extend the Obama policies through Hillary.

Oh, wait....

Imagine if just once, you had a thought that didn't come from Alternet or one of the Soros hate sites? Ah, but that will never happen.

We're at full employment no matter how you try to spin it. Trump was elected because America didn't have enough trust and confidence in Hillary. As far as Obama, his job approval rating is as high as Reagan's was at this point in his presidency.

Who was polled to determine his job approval? How many americans? where do they live? Give us the stats of the poll or STFU

Here ya go, contact Gallup for those details...

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval

1500 people out of 330,000,000. Gallop also predicted that HRC would win and that there was no path to 270 EC votes for Trump.

you are free to buy this shit if you want, but the election of novermber 2016 proved that the pollsters are both biased and incompetent.

Here .... lemme help you with those Gallup election poll numbers you're struggling to find....

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

 

[Redfish]

1. a market correction brought on by bad mortgage policy is not a recession
2. the PV count is still pending, once the fraudulent votes are removed, Trump is likely to win, but it doesn't really matter, we don't elect president by PV.

Might be time to call the nurse for your daily meds and catheter change.

Just so everyone else sees what I've already seen -- I note, you still flat out refuse to offer what economic conditions you think are needed to occur to qualify as a recession.

And the reason you won't is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

check 1929, do some research. you might learn something. 2008 was NOT a recession. Calling it a recession is an excuse dreamed up by both parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

"Bush's great recession" = your all time most idiotic post.

"1929" is not a definition of a recession.

Keep running, Redfish.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

OK, let me try again so you might understand. I do not agree with the definition created by the political parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

Unlike you, I actually have a mind and am able to reason and think for myself.

So post your definition......

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

1929 was the beginning of a depression, the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession.

bad mortgage policy and a market correction is not a recession.

but continue to be deluded if it makes you feel good, I really don't give a shit what you believe.

 

[Faun]

Just so everyone else sees what I've already seen -- I note, you still flat out refuse to offer what economic conditions you think are needed to occur to qualify as a recession.

And the reason you won't is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

check 1929, do some research. you might learn something. 2008 was NOT a recession. Calling it a recession is an excuse dreamed up by both parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

"Bush's great recession" = your all time most idiotic post.

"1929" is not a definition of a recession.

Keep running, Redfish.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

OK, let me try again so you might understand. I do not agree with the definition created by the political parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

Unlike you, I actually have a mind and am able to reason and think for myself.

So post your definition......

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

1929 was the beginning of a depression, the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession.

bad mortgage policy and a market correction is not a recession.

but continue to be deluded if it makes you feel good, I really don't give a shit what you believe.

What you think is not a recession is not a definition of a recession.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

 

[Redfish]

Jobs are SO GOOD that America rushed to extend the Obama policies through Hillary.

Oh, wait....

Imagine if just once, you had a thought that didn't come from Alternet or one of the Soros hate sites? Ah, but that will never happen.

We're at full employment no matter how you try to spin it. Trump was elected because America didn't have enough trust and confidence in Hillary. As far as Obama, his job approval rating is as high as Reagan's was at this point in his presidency.

Who was polled to determine his job approval? How many americans? where do they live? Give us the stats of the poll or STFU

Here ya go, contact Gallup for those details...

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval

1500 people out of 330,000,000. Gallop also predicted that HRC would win and that there was no path to 270 EC votes for Trump.

you are free to buy this shit if you want, but the election of novermber 2016 proved that the pollsters are both biased and incompetent.

Here .... lemme help you with those Gallup election poll numbers you're struggling to find....

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

Uh, Gallop is not on the RCP list that you cited. Got anything else?

 

[Redfish]

check 1929, do some research. you might learn something. 2008 was NOT a recession. Calling it a recession is an excuse dreamed up by both parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

"Bush's great recession" = your all time most idiotic post.

"1929" is not a definition of a recession.

Keep running, Redfish.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

OK, let me try again so you might understand. I do not agree with the definition created by the political parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

Unlike you, I actually have a mind and am able to reason and think for myself.

So post your definition......

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

1929 was the beginning of a depression, the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession.

bad mortgage policy and a market correction is not a recession.

but continue to be deluded if it makes you feel good, I really don't give a shit what you believe.

What you think is not a recession is not a definition of a recession.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

LOL, do you enjoy making a fool of yourself? Keep posting the same shit, that'll show em!

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Learn how to use the quote function. People still won't understand what you write, but it will help.

Meanwhile, no one called for a 14 year old to be raped. That's a delusion in your mindless head.

No one expects understanding from you, meat puppet. We expect and get, the mindless recitation of talking points from the Soros hate sites, That really is the extent of you "intellect."

Oh, and you keep telling the same lie over and over, even after noting that Letterman apologized for what you claim he didn't do.

You twist yourself in knots with your absurd lies, all because you define reality by the goals of your filthy party, the Khmer Rouge.

 

[Faun]

We're at full employment no matter how you try to spin it. Trump was elected because America didn't have enough trust and confidence in Hillary. As far as Obama, his job approval rating is as high as Reagan's was at this point in his presidency.

Who was polled to determine his job approval? How many americans? where do they live? Give us the stats of the poll or STFU

Here ya go, contact Gallup for those details...

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval

1500 people out of 330,000,000. Gallop also predicted that HRC would win and that there was no path to 270 EC votes for Trump.

you are free to buy this shit if you want, but the election of novermber 2016 proved that the pollsters are both biased and incompetent.

Here .... lemme help you with those Gallup election poll numbers you're struggling to find....

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

Uh, Gallop is not on the RCP list that you cited.

Exactly. Because Gallup didn't weigh in with such polls.

Got anything else?

LOLOL

That's your homework assignment. Have you forgotten already? You're the one who claimed Gallup's polls predicted a Hillary victory. It's your job to prove that, not mine.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sorry, but I can't help you understand the words, "and the 3 states they got wrong."

Trump won in a landslide, retard.

You honestly have no grip on reality at all, do you?

 

[Faun]

[
Learn how to use the quote function. People still won't understand what you write, but it will help.

Meanwhile, no one called for a 14 year old to be raped. That's a delusion in your mindless head.

No one expects understanding from you, meat puppet. We expect and get, the mindless recitation of talking points from the Soros hate sites, That really is the extent of you "intellect."

Oh, and you keep telling the same lie over and over, even after noting that Letterman apologized for what you claim he didn't do.

You twist yourself in knots with your absurd lies, all because you define reality by the goals of your filthy party, the Khmer Rouge.

You're too retarded. When did I ever claim Letterman apologized for something he didn't do?

He told a joke for which he apologized. I never said he didn't tell the joke.

What I did say, but you're too dimwitted to comprehend, was his intended target of the joke was 18 year old (at that time) Bristol Palin, not 14 year old Willow.

 

[Faun]

Sorry, but I can't help you understand the words, "and the 3 states they got wrong."

Trump won in a landslide, retard.

You honestly have no grip on reality at all, do you?

Speaking of being divorced from reality -- where did I ever deny Trump won the election in a landslide?

Oh, wait, I never did. You're just another demented conservative.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Sorry, but I can't help that George Soros has infected your brain and mind ***** you daily.

Fawn, you can't do ANYTHING other than read from a script provided to you by the hate sites.

THAT is my point. You have zero knowledge and zero intellect.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Discuss what you want, but the fact remains -- 4.9% unemployment, 72 consecutive months of job growth, and a record high stock market is not the definition of a mess.

If you want to see what a mess looks like, look at the end of 2008 and early 2009 when unemployment was 7.8% and growing, over million people became unemployed in January, 2009, and the stock market lost half of its valuation.

Jobs are SO GOOD that America rushed to extend the Obama policies through Hillary.

Oh, wait....

Imagine if just once, you had a thought that didn't come from Alternet or one of the Soros hate sites? Ah, but that will never happen.

We're at full employment no matter how you try to spin it. Trump was elected because America didn't have enough trust and confidence in Hillary. As far as Obama, his job approval rating is as high as Reagan's was at this point in his presidency.

Who was polled to determine his job approval? How many americans? where do they live? Give us the stats of the poll or STFU

Here ya go, contact Gallup for those details...

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval

1500 people out of 330,000,000. Gallop also predicted that HRC would win and that there was no path to 270 EC votes for Trump.

you are free to buy this shit if you want, but the election of novermber 2016 proved that the pollsters are both biased and incompetent.

The national poll average that you claimed was meaningless only missed the final margin by 1.4 points.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Sorry, but I can't help you understand the words, "and the 3 states they got wrong."

Trump won in a landslide, retard.

You honestly have no grip on reality at all, do you?

You don't win by a landslide when the other person gets more votes than you do.

 

[Faun]

"1929" is not a definition of a recession.

Keep running, Redfish.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

OK, let me try again so you might understand. I do not agree with the definition created by the political parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

Unlike you, I actually have a mind and am able to reason and think for myself.

So post your definition......

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

1929 was the beginning of a depression, the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession.

bad mortgage policy and a market correction is not a recession.

but continue to be deluded if it makes you feel good, I really don't give a shit what you believe.

What you think is not a recession is not a definition of a recession.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

LOL, do you enjoy making a fool of yourself? Keep posting the same shit, that'll show em!

If highlighting your lies makes a fool of me, so be it.

You still refuse to post what you believe the definition of a recession is.

Now let's move onto your next lie ...

the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession

... prove that.

Quote one single notable economist saying the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession....

 

[NYcarbineer]

check 1929, do some research. you might learn something. 2008 was NOT a recession. Calling it a recession is an excuse dreamed up by both parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

"Bush's great recession" = your all time most idiotic post.

"1929" is not a definition of a recession.

Keep running, Redfish.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

OK, let me try again so you might understand. I do not agree with the definition created by the political parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

Unlike you, I actually have a mind and am able to reason and think for myself.

So post your definition......

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

1929 was the beginning of a depression, the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession.

bad mortgage policy and a market correction is not a recession.

but continue to be deluded if it makes you feel good, I really don't give a shit what you believe.

What you think is not a recession is not a definition of a recession.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

Redfish thinks he's right based on his belief that he gets to define what a recession is.

And apparently he defines winning the popular vote as getting less than the other guy.

 

[Faun]

[
Sorry, but I can't help that George Soros has infected your brain and mind ***** you daily.

Fawn, you can't do ANYTHING other than read from a script provided to you by the hate sites.

THAT is my point. You have zero knowledge and zero intellect.

Sadly for you, his mind-******* your brain persists.

 

[NYcarbineer]

We're at full employment no matter how you try to spin it. Trump was elected because America didn't have enough trust and confidence in Hillary. As far as Obama, his job approval rating is as high as Reagan's was at this point in his presidency.

Who was polled to determine his job approval? How many americans? where do they live? Give us the stats of the poll or STFU

Here ya go, contact Gallup for those details...

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval

1500 people out of 330,000,000. Gallop also predicted that HRC would win and that there was no path to 270 EC votes for Trump.

you are free to buy this shit if you want, but the election of novermber 2016 proved that the pollsters are both biased and incompetent.

Here .... lemme help you with those Gallup election poll numbers you're struggling to find....

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

Uh, Gallop is not on the RCP list that you cited. Got anything else?

You claimed Gallup polls predicted a Clinton win. You lie.

 

[9thIDdoc]

I'm a veteran ...

John Kerry, on the other hand, doesn't deserve the title of veteran. He is, and was, a self serving egotist focused only on enhancing his own career while willingly, and intentionally, sacrificing his men in order to forward his career goals.

He is an embarrassment to the veteran community.

I'm a retired US Navy sailor, with over 20 years of service, and I respectfully disagree with you.

ANYONE who has served a full term and was discharged with Under Honorable Conditions discharge or better, gets to have the title of veteran. They earned it, regardless of what I think of their politics.

There are people on this board who are also veterans and we disagree quite a bit, but we recognize each others service and honor that part of them, if not the rest.

You should do so as well, even if you don't like Kerry. He served the time, he's a vet.

I disagree ... it has nothing to do with politics.

It has to do with his performance AS a veteran. He has forfeited my respect. (The operative word is "honor")

You gotta admit if you're being honest, that there are people currently in the military and those who have served honorably and gotten out, who were pretty crappy human beings. I had a LT on my first ship who was a ring knocker who thought he knew everything (he didn't), as well as have worked with enlisted people who did their job, did it fairly well, but were miserable to be around.

Even though I didn't like those people and thought they were piss poor excuses for human beings, I still recognized their service as veterans if they had a General Under Honorable Conditions or better discharge.

The only ones I don't consider veterans are those whose DD214s say General Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (OTH), Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD, also known as Big Chicken Dinner), or Dishonorable, because the military said they didn't recognize their service as honorable.

Everyone else? If the military recognizes their service as Honorable, that's good enough for me, even if I don't like them.

Kerry did serve and managed to come home after a shortened tour due to three band aid injuries. He did get an Honhiorable discharge and then got lower than whale shit as a veteran by throwing his military ribbons over the White House wall to protest the Vietnam war. He then testified before Congress:

"They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country."

4/22/71 War ended on 8/15/73

He gave aid and comfort to the enemy while we were still engaged in armed conflict and is in a tie with Jane Fonda for being a traitor and a sorry human being, IMHO.

I recall an interview with Kerry's wife where she spoke of Kerry being awakened often from the pain from one of his wounds. Degrading his service just shows what a dick you are. Actually, Kerry's post war actions helped end the Vietnam war earlier & that save soldier's lives

Those atrocities did happen.

Unmitigated horseshit!! What part of Kerry's lies were well and truly proven as such by CID investigation did you miss? Kerry and his crew (Winter Soldier cult)were liars in sworn testimony to Congress which is itself a serious criminal offence. Kerry met and conspired with enemy officials during time of war (treason). Kerry's "wounds" altogether might have been almost as serious as your average paper cut. Kerry never had any knowledge of actual atrocities. Yes he volunteered for swift boat duty and saw a minuscule amount of combat after which he dishonored himself in his efforts to abandon his boat crew and chicken out of the duty he had volunteered for. He was and is about on a par with pond scum and degrading his (lack of) service is in fact simply accepting reality.

 

[Faun]

"1929" is not a definition of a recession.

Keep running, Redfish.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

OK, let me try again so you might understand. I do not agree with the definition created by the political parties to cover their incompetent economic policies.

Unlike you, I actually have a mind and am able to reason and think for myself.

So post your definition......

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

1929 was the beginning of a depression, the years leading up to 1929 were years of recession.

bad mortgage policy and a market correction is not a recession.

but continue to be deluded if it makes you feel good, I really don't give a shit what you believe.

What you think is not a recession is not a definition of a recession.

Like I said, the reason you don't post the definition of a recession is because if you did, Bush's Great Recession would fit neatly into the definition.

Redfish thinks he's right based on his belief that he gets to define what a recession is.

And apparently he defines winning the popular vote as getting less than the other guy.

He can't even find a single notable economist who agrees with him; rendering his opinion, lies.