Sarah Palin all but says she was sexually assaulted at Fox News

Covenant communities are the end goal. Civil war and dismantling of the central government must happen first.
Charge, and shit.
I knew you were too stupid to give a real answer.
Ain't heard a real proposal.
It isn't a proposal, it is something that will and must happen.
Sure.
Okay...you're too dumb to discuss this with. Carry on...
 
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?
 
To add....I actually hate democracy, so to be fair...I don't want any voting in the long run. I want covenant communities that run on social contracts signed by the people living there at the time.
That would be a covenant community of 10 million like Los Angeles or would the covenant community of East Los Angeles declare war on South Central Los Angeles? What is your proposal for those who refuse to sign covenants?

What you want is an HOA with the force of law.
Like the confederacy attempted.
No. It would not be like the confederacy.
It won't get that far, yeah.
Oh it will...the dissolution of the US federal government is inevitable. All empires fall. Name one that hasn't?
Some day, of course. Like when the roman empire collapsed after the christians took over.
 
Suddenly, CNN loves themselves some Palin.
I loves me some Palin. ;)

sdd89y.jpg
 
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
 
I only watch Tucker on FOX. Other than that, I have been done with them for awhile. They have too many chick commentators, I honestly think 99.99% of women should not vote because they are too emotional and illogical to handle the responsibility. And their commentary on politics is always annoying.
^ There you go.....
To add....I actually hate democracy, so to be fair...I don't want any voting in the long run. I want covenant communities that run on social contracts signed by the people living there at the time.
Wonderful.
I am sure you're being sarcastic...so I just want to ask what your beef with my idea is? Communities formed by agreement are bad in your opinion, why?
Communities formed by agreement are HOAs. They have their place. There are people who refuse to live under HOA rules so they choose not to live in such places.
 
I only watch Tucker on FOX. Other than that, I have been done with them for awhile. They have too many chick commentators, I honestly think 99.99% of women should not vote because they are too emotional and illogical to handle the responsibility. And their commentary on politics is always annoying.
^ There you go.....
To add....I actually hate democracy, so to be fair...I don't want any voting in the long run. I want covenant communities that run on social contracts signed by the people living there at the time.
Wonderful.
I am sure you're being sarcastic...so I just want to ask what your beef with my idea is? Communities formed by agreement are bad in your opinion, why?
Communities formed by agreement are HOAs. They have their place. There are people who refuse to live under HOA rules so they choose not to live in such places.
No shit, never would.
 
What you call covenant communities is actually a return to tribalism. It will happen. The people are divided and no longer make decisions for the good of all. Just on the good of the tribe.

Out of that will rise warlords and feudalism, along the line, a return to representative government.
 
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
Exactly like I said, you want a central gov to force others to take care of losers who cannot take care of themselves. The difference between what I am talking about and feudalism is you can choose to have a socialistic covenant community. Nobody will stop you from doing so.
 
I only watch Tucker on FOX. Other than that, I have been done with them for awhile. They have too many chick commentators, I honestly think 99.99% of women should not vote because they are too emotional and illogical to handle the responsibility. And their commentary on politics is always annoying.
^ There you go.....
To add....I actually hate democracy, so to be fair...I don't want any voting in the long run. I want covenant communities that run on social contracts signed by the people living there at the time.
Wonderful.
I am sure you're being sarcastic...so I just want to ask what your beef with my idea is? Communities formed by agreement are bad in your opinion, why?
Communities formed by agreement are HOAs. They have their place. There are people who refuse to live under HOA rules so they choose not to live in such places.
No, HOA's are different.
 
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
Exactly like I said, you want a central gov to force others to take care of losers who cannot take care of themselves. The difference between what I am talking about and feudalism is you can choose to have a socialistic covenant community. Nobody will stop you from doing so.
Same thing. So you can't name one? What about yours, what's it called?
 
What you call covenant communities is actually a return to tribalism. It will happen. The people are divided and no longer make decisions for the good of all. Just on the good of the tribe.

Out of that will rise warlords and feudalism, along the line, a return to representative government.
It may become feudalistic, I won't deny that because I don't have a crystal ball...however what I am talking about are communities of consent and these are more respectful of human nature than any other form of society you could come up with. Of course, because what I am talking about is natural and voluntary.
 
What you call covenant communities is actually a return to tribalism. It will happen. The people are divided and no longer make decisions for the good of all. Just on the good of the tribe.

Out of that will rise warlords and feudalism, along the line, a return to representative government.
It may become feudalistic, I won't deny that because I don't have a crystal ball...however what I am talking about are communities of consent and these are more respectful of human nature than any other form of society you could come up with. Of course, because what I am talking about is natural and voluntary.
You were going to name one of these, yeah? Tell us where this is going on?
 
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
Exactly like I said, you want a central gov to force others to take care of losers who cannot take care of themselves. The difference between what I am talking about and feudalism is you can choose to have a socialistic covenant community. Nobody will stop you from doing so.
Same thing. So you can't name one? What about yours, what's it called?
Well we had them during Jim Crow times....beautiful communities(both white and black) that only went to shit when idiots like you called for gubmint to force everyone together.
 
What you call covenant communities is actually a return to tribalism. It will happen. The people are divided and no longer make decisions for the good of all. Just on the good of the tribe.

Out of that will rise warlords and feudalism, along the line, a return to representative government.
Actually tribal societies here did make decisions for the good of all, for tens and hundreds of thousands of years. But then the americas got "discovered" and the virus arrived.
 
15th post
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
Exactly like I said, you want a central gov to force others to take care of losers who cannot take care of themselves. The difference between what I am talking about and feudalism is you can choose to have a socialistic covenant community. Nobody will stop you from doing so.
No. It just won't survive long. A covenant community based on socialism was tried in the first years of the settlement of this country. Read William Bradford's account of how it turned out.

Today, the way socialistic communities solve problems of self induced shortages is to take what they need from the unwilling. Right now it's to raise taxes on the productive. A few changes here and there and it's raids on the next door covenant community.
 
But Fentom....tell me what is BAD about covenant communities? Why are communities based on agreement horrible in your opinion?

Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
Exactly like I said, you want a central gov to force others to take care of losers who cannot take care of themselves. The difference between what I am talking about and feudalism is you can choose to have a socialistic covenant community. Nobody will stop you from doing so.
No. It just won't survive long. A covenant community based on socialism was tried in the first years of the settlement of this country. Read William Bradford's account of how it turned out.

Today, the way socialistic communities solve problems of self induced shortages is to take what they need from the unwilling. Right now it's to raise taxes on the productive. A few changes here and there and it's raids on the next door covenant community.
So what? I am NOT the keeper of strangers. I am my brothers(and sisters) keeper.
 
Where is one?
Answer my question first. What is your beef with the concept? You want a central government to force everyone to live with each other because losers like you couldn't survive on your own or what?

Sounds like feudalism, we tried that. Wall, moat, starving masses outside. We're pretty close to that in america now.

Where is one again?
Exactly like I said, you want a central gov to force others to take care of losers who cannot take care of themselves. The difference between what I am talking about and feudalism is you can choose to have a socialistic covenant community. Nobody will stop you from doing so.
Same thing. So you can't name one? What about yours, what's it called?
Well we had them during Jim Crow times....beautiful communities(both white and black) that only went to shit when idiots like you called for gubmint to force everyone together.
No hon, you don't know anything about anyone. So there are none, got it. Intentional communities I get. What you're referring to was collections of the unsubstantial people banding together in non-cooperation and non-participation, and in defiance of an authoritarian pwoer structure that was in essence mining the resources of the labor of human beings. Anything along those lines I heartily support and actively seek opportunites to be part of.
 
Back
Top Bottom