- Banned
- #81
Democrats proved they would indict a ham sandwich on Trumped up charges.Was it a ham sandwich? Maybe they could put the sandwich on trial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Democrats proved they would indict a ham sandwich on Trumped up charges.Was it a ham sandwich? Maybe they could put the sandwich on trial.
If, as reported, it was a Subway sandwich, you wouldn't be able to tell what kind of meat it was.Was it a ham sandwich? Maybe they could put the sandwich on trial.
To be fair, he didn't get to eat that cheap Subway foot long. Guess he's not on SNAP, eh? Maybe those poor illegals that he was trying to protect would have liked to eat it.They put Jan 6 mom and pop demonstrators away for four years for violations that hardly rose to the level of misdemeanor trespass but the guy who engaged in an unprovoked assault on federal officers goes free. WTF?
Like they say, ya can't make this stuff up.Or, in reality, nowhere, and you totally made that up out of thin air.
The only standards the No Kings crowd have is double-standards.They put Jan 6 mom and pop demonstrators away for four years for violations that hardly rose to the level of misdemeanor trespass but the guy who engaged in an unprovoked assault on federal officers goes free. WTF?
Any assault is still assault.Beating a cop with a fire extinguisher on J6: PARDON! Throwing a sandwich at the feet of a cop: FELONY!
Oh.....and he didn't beat anyone with it. He tossed it and it bounced off of a cop's helmet.Beating a cop with a fire extinguisher on J6: PARDON! Throwing a sandwich at the feet of a cop: FELONY!
Turned out to be the most expensive sandwich he'll ever buy.....and he went home hungry.Meh, at least he got put through "the process"......I bet he eats his sandwich next time.
Charlie Kirk was killed by a bullet that cost about as much as a subway sandwich. Is that funny too?To be fair, he didn't get to eat that cheap Subway foot long. Guess he's not on SNAP, eh? Maybe those poor illegals that he was trying to protect would have liked to eat it.
When was the last time someone was killed by a Subway sandwich that didn't involve choking on it. Don't act like a democrat.Charlie Kirk was killed by a bullet that cost about as much as a subway sandwich. Is that funny too?
*for the US taxpayerTurned out to be the most expensive sandwich he'll ever buy..
Except for the favt that you 100% made up the idea of getting charged for attempted murder iver finger guns. Why are you still trying to defend that dumb lie? I don't see what you have to gain.Like they say, ya can't make this stuff up.
![]()
Zero Tolerance Follies: TN 10-Year-Old Expelled for a Year Over Finger Gun Gesture
The principal’s action was the result of a new state law that had gone into effect just months earlier, heightening penalties for students who make threats at school. Passed after a former student…www.shootingnewsweekly.com
It was meant to be a humorous jab at that zero-tolerance policy. Recall that Rush used absurdity to point out absurdity.Except for the favt that you 100% made up the idea of getting charged for attempted murder iver finger guns. Why are you still trying to defend that dumb lie? I don't see what you have to gain.
Yes, the famously dishonest predator who preyed on ignorant and dumb people was, indeed, famous for such open-ended, specious horseshit.It was meant to be a humorous jab at that zero-tolerance policy. Recall that Rush used absurdity to point out absurdity.
I assume the defendant had to pay for a lawyer. Also, he lost his job. So, the cost wasn’t solely on the taxpayers.*for the US taxpayer
.I assume the defendant had to pay for a lawyer. Also, he lost his job. So, the cost wasn’t solely on the taxpayers.
The defendant was a dickhead. But I’ll say it again, it wasn’t an “assault” at all.
But was definitely more expensive for the taxpayers and was obviously theater by MAGAts trying to bank points for after Dear Leader exits this plane.I assume the defendant had to pay for a lawyer. Also, he lost his job. So, the cost wasn’t solely on the taxpayers.