San Francisco business owner arrested for doing the government’s job

[fncceo]

If someone is loitering around, even on a public sidewalk, in front of your home or business, perhaps PC 653.22, loitering for/with intent to commit prostitution will apply.

 

[B. Kidd]

If someone is loitering around, even on a public sidewalk, in front of your home or business, perhaps PC 653.22, loitering for/with intent to commit prostitution will apply.

View attachment 752612

 

[Concerned American]

I do know. Public sidewalks are public sidewalks. They are public if they are in front of my house and if they are in front of the mini Mart down the street or even the power plant down the road.

You would have to be pretty freaking stupid to actually believe their was a difference.

Then park on one and see what happens--after all it is a public sidewalk. BTW, have you ever seen a public sidesleep

 

[Catsnmeters]

Then park on one and see what happens--after all it is a public sidewalk. BTW, have you ever seen a public sidesleep

Why would I park on a sidewalk? That is illegal. Are you ok?

Are you claiming that sidewalks are only for walking? You can't stand, run, sit or lay?

Good grief you flailing hard. I suppose you think it's wrong for people to park on a driveway? Lol.

 

[Concerned American]

That is illegal.

So is sleeping on the sidewalk in SF.

You can't stand, run, sit or lay?

Or roller skate or skateboard. Or impede someone's right to pass.

 

[Concerned American]

I suppose you think it's wrong for people to park on a driveway

Park in front of a driveway, moron. You are the one flailing and exhibiting ignorance with each post.

 

[Catsnmeters]

So is sleeping on the sidewalk in SF.

Or roller skate or skateboard. Or impede someone's right to pass.

Why don't you stop with the false equivalencies and simply look up the law?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

If the government isn't doing it's job, it isn't vigilantism, that only happens in the presence of viable government projection and ownership of power.

Horseshit. It's vigilantism. And you aren't any sort of objective observer regarding our government 'doing its job'.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Why would I park on a sidewalk? That is illegal. Are you ok?

Are you claiming that sidewalks are only for walking? You can't stand, run, sit or lay?

Good grief you flailing hard. I suppose you think it's wrong for people to park on a driveway? Lol.

It's just a stupid concern troll. Waste of time.

 

[Concerned American]

It's just a stupid concern troll. Waste of time.

Both of you are ignorant fucks. Educate yourselves.

SEC. 169. PROMOTION OF SAFE AND OPEN SIDEWALKS.

Legal publisher offering ordinance codification services for local governments, specializing in providing codes of ordinances in print and on the Internet

codelibrary.amlegal.com

San Francisco’s Sit/Lie Ordinance: Criminalizing Homelessness for Cleaner Streets

SF Penal Code – 168(B) MPC Intent of Law The Civil Sidewalks Ordinance, Section 168(B) of the San Francisco Penal Code, commonly known as the “Sit/Lie” Ordinance, finds it unlawful for…

foundationsoflawandsociety.wordpress.com

 

[Mac-7]

He will be treated as the law requires.

He should have thought of that before he broke the law.

You make him sound like a mass murderer

Imagine you own a small business and must pay taxes, rent, utilities, insurance, cost of goods, aka inventory, and sundry other expenses

And right outside your door in the very front of your modest little shop you have a crazy woman shouting at your customers as they walk by

She really is crazy you know

Even the disgusting little prick who turned the store owner into the cops admitted that

I think the liberal voters in SF as well as the ones on this forum (Marener Blues Man , ect) are as nuts as the crazy woman for demanding that taxpayers be driven out of business so that street bums can poop on the sidewalks

 

[Blues Man]

San Francisco Business Owner Arrested for Spraying Homeless Person With Water

Officers with the San Francisco Police Department on Wednesday arrested a business owner filmed spraying water on a homeless woman

ijr.com

He has since been bullied and threatened into making a Soviet-style confession and apology

But he neednt have bothered

The libs at city hall will probably throw the book at him anyway

If you want to know what he did open the link and see for yourself

It was a public sidewalk he has no right to stop anyone from using it.

 

[Mac-7]

Both of you are ignorant fucks. Educate yourselves.

SEC. 169. PROMOTION OF SAFE AND OPEN SIDEWALKS.

Legal publisher offering ordinance codification services for local governments, specializing in providing codes of ordinances in print and on the Internet

codelibrary.amlegal.com

San Francisco’s Sit/Lie Ordinance: Criminalizing Homelessness for Cleaner Streets

SF Penal Code – 168(B) MPC Intent of Law The Civil Sidewalks Ordinance, Section 168(B) of the San Francisco Penal Code, commonly known as the “Sit/Lie” Ordinance, finds it unlawful for…

foundationsoflawandsociety.wordpress.com

Marener are you listening?

 

[Mac-7]

It was a public sidewalk he has no right to stop anyone from using it.

See post #190

 

[martybegan]

Horseshit. It's vigilantism. And you aren't any sort of objective observer regarding our government 'doing its job'.

No, it isn't because the governments in many places have decided to break the compact vis a vis law enforcement.

We don't give up our rights of self policing to the government, we lend them to it, and if it decides it doesn't want to perform their duties anymore, we retain them.

 

[Mac-7]

Your rights are not contingent on what you “contribute to society”.

They are endowed by our creator.

Right?

True, but common sense should warn you that only taxpayers contribute to and pay for the government services that libs treasure so much

Street bums contribute nothing and take much

 

[Catsnmeters]

You make him sound like a mass murderer

Imagine you own a small business and must pay taxes, rent, utilities, insurance, cost of goods, aka inventory, and sundry other expenses

And right outside your door in the very front of your modest little shop you have a crazy woman shouting at your customers as they walk by

She really is crazy you know

Even the disgusting little prick who turned the store owner into the cops admitted that

I think the liberal voters in SF as well as the ones on this forum (Marener Blues Man , ect) are as nuts as the crazy woman for demanding that taxpayers be driven out of business so that street bums can poop on the sidewalks

I can picture it. I can picture him breaking the law too.what is it with Trump supporters who seem to claim law and order but are always quick to dismiss it when it's politically expedient.

Are you guys law and order or not or is just a salad bar?

 

[Mac-7]

I can picture it. I can picture him breaking the law too.what is it with Trump supporters who seem to claim law and order but are always quick to dismiss it when it's politically expedient.

Are you guys law and order or not or is just a salad bar?

You think this is only about the rights of one dirty, crazy homeless woman and totally ignore the harm she is causing

We have a failure of liberal Trump-hating local government

And it shouldn't take MAGA to see that

 

[Catsnmeters]

You think this is only about the rights of one dirty, crazy homeless woman and totally ignore the harm she is causing

We have a failure of liberal Trump-hating local government

And it shouldn't take MAGA to see that

It is about this woman's rights and the law.

The guy broke the law, she didn't.

Not sure what else you want me to say.

 

[Mac-7]

It is about this woman's rights and the law.

The guy broke the law, she didn't.

Not sure what else you want me to say.

See post 190

She broke the law first and the pinheads at city hall did not do their job