SAME SEX RULING SETS UP NATIONAL RECIPROCITY FOR CONCEALED CARRY

[Lovebears65]

Same Sex Ruling Sets Up National Reciprocity for Concealed Carry - Breitbart

Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, no State shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The fundamental liberties protected by this Clause include most of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

Now the question–Are 2nd Amendment rights among those “protected by this Clause”?

If we take the SCOTUS at its word, then yes, 2nd Amendment rights are protected under the 14th Amendment. After all, it was by viewing 2nd Amendment rights as incorporated under the 14th Amendment that the SCOTUS struck down Chicago’s gun ban inMcDonald v Chicago (2010).

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Already a thread on this, and, who gives a fuck? Oh right, no one.

 

[deltex1]

PMS is baking his wedding cake...a bit on edge...

 

[OKTexas]

Already a thread on this, and, who gives a fuck? Oh right, no one.

Your right, we don't need the commie court, congress is already working on a fix.

 

[NYcarbineer]

No it doesn't.

 

[bodecea]

I am all for Gay Americans getting CC permits.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I am all for Gay Americans getting CC permits.

Sorry, people with mental disorders are banned from obtaining one

 

[jwoodie]

Same Sex Ruling Sets Up National Reciprocity for Concealed Carry - Breitbart

Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, no State shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The fundamental liberties protected by this Clause include most of the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

Now the question–Are 2nd Amendment rights among those “protected by this Clause”?

If we take the SCOTUS at its word, then yes, 2nd Amendment rights are protected under the 14th Amendment. After all, it was by viewing 2nd Amendment rights as incorporated under the 14th Amendment that the SCOTUS struck down Chicago’s gun ban inMcDonald v Chicago (2010).

Of course not. The Constitution is a "living" document that can be expanded or contracted at the whim of the political operatives who are appointed to the Court.

 

[Silhouette]

Well upon checking, there's nowhere in the Constitution that explicity speaks about protection for behaviors. And since having sex with someone of the same gender routinely is a routine/behavior, we have to extrapolate that this new type of coverage under the Constitution (which I think only Congress can do), would, in the interest of "equality" have to apply to any type of behavior, no matter how repugnant to the individual states.

???

ie: now that the SCOTUS has revised the Constitution to newly include covering a right to behavior as an identity, I suppose that people with an orientation to want to conceal-carry (fears, legitimate defense etc., "inborn"), you know Conceal-Carry Americans, would have a civil right to express their habit as a matter of undeniable law.

 

[bodecea]

I am all for Gay Americans getting CC permits.

Sorry, people with mental disorders are banned from obtaining one

Sorry to hear that your guns were taken away...also you have an odd way of putting people on Ignore like you claim.