Same sex marriage OR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

[Judicial review]

Take your pick. This is the decision that the Supreme Court just forced itself to hvae to make in the future by ruling same sex marriage as a right equal to freedom of religion, speech and protest as stated in the 1st amendment or if you will the 1st bill of rights. It should have NEVER listened to this case for THIS exact reason. Period.

 

[Socialist]

"NO MORE SLAVERY OR FREEDOM, TAKE YOUR PICK"
"NEGROS SHARING OUR WATER FOUNTAINS OR FREEDOM, TAKE YOUR PICK."
"WOMEN VOTING OR MALE FREEDOM, TAKE YOUR PICK."
"VOLUNTARY CHILD LABOR OR FREEDOM, TAKE YOUR PICK"
"A MINIMUM WAGE OR FREEDOM, TAKE YOUR PICK"
Just shut up already.

 

[Moonglow]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

 

[Judicial review]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

 

[S.J.]

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

 

[Socialist]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

You don't even understand, churches won't be forced to hold marriages.

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

You can't actually believe what you're post says, that's fear mongering and idiocy.

 

[HappyJoy]

Churches aren't even obligated to marry straight couples.

 

[Skylar]

Take your pick. This is the decision that the Supreme Court just forced itself to hvae to make in the future by ruling same sex marriage as a right equal to freedom of religion, speech and protest as stated in the 1st amendment or if you will the 1st bill of rights. It should have NEVER listened to this case for THIS exact reason. Period.

They aren't mutually exclusive. You're using the false choice fallacy.

 

[Judicial review]

Take your pick. This is the decision that the Supreme Court just forced itself to hvae to make in the future by ruling same sex marriage as a right equal to freedom of religion, speech and protest as stated in the 1st amendment or if you will the 1st bill of rights. It should have NEVER listened to this case for THIS exact reason. Period.

They aren't mutually exclusive. You're using the false choice fallacy.

They are separate rights now guaranteed. They will be forced to go up against one another and any ruling in favor of one or the other make the other one null and void.

 

[BlackSand]

Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

They won't shut them down ... They will remove their tax exempt status.
People are still going to pray ... The government just wants their cut.

Churches aren't even obligated to marry straight couples.

Minor oversight ... Not that it matters.

But anyway ... It is pretty much a done deal and some people had a really good day.
You might as well be happy for them ... Because that is about all you have left.

.

 

[Judicial review]

Nutz SmarterThanTheAverageBear Toro emilynghiem

 

[Skylar]

Take your pick. This is the decision that the Supreme Court just forced itself to hvae to make in the future by ruling same sex marriage as a right equal to freedom of religion, speech and protest as stated in the 1st amendment or if you will the 1st bill of rights. It should have NEVER listened to this case for THIS exact reason. Period.

They aren't mutually exclusive. You're using the false choice fallacy.

They are separate rights now guaranteed. They will be forced to go up against one another and any ruling in favor of one or the other make the other one null and void.

You can have religious freedom and you can have same sex marriage. Its not one or the other. Your premise is the false choice fallacy. As you can have both.

As far as forcing one to go against the other, your premise is that the Supreme Court will rule against churches being able to deny gays. And that's nonsense. You have no idea what you're talking about and have no real sense of probability. Making your assessment of what's gonna happen essentially meaningless.

 

[Socialist]

Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

They won't shut them down ... They will remove their tax exempt status.
People are still going to pray ... The government just wants their cut.

.

They shouldn't have a tax exempt status in the first place.

 

[S.J.]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

You don't even understand, churches won't be forced to hold marriages.

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

You can't actually believe what you're post says, that's fear mongering and idiocy.

Tell that to the bakers and photographers who were sued for not bowing to the radical homosexual agenda.

 

[Socialist]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

You don't even understand, churches won't be forced to hold marriages.

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

You can't actually believe what you're post says, that's fear mongering and idiocy.

Tell that to the bakers and photographers who were sued for not bowing to the radical homosexual agenda.

Jesus christ, do you want to talk about shit done by the right wing? Let's not start this idiocy. I'm sure you fully support the "right" of businesses to discriminate and not hire blacks, that's cool, but to you, I say fuck off.

 

[Skylar]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

You don't even understand, churches won't be forced to hold marriages.

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

You can't actually believe what you're post says, that's fear mongering and idiocy.

Tell that to the bakers and photographers who were sued for not bowing to the radical homosexual agenda.

They violated state PA laws. If your religion makes it impossible to do your job, find another job.

 

[S.J.]

Churches aren't even obligated to marry straight couples.

Of course not, there's no political gain in that, Clueless.

 

[S.J.]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

You don't even understand, churches won't be forced to hold marriages.

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

You can't actually believe what you're post says, that's fear mongering and idiocy.

Tell that to the bakers and photographers who were sued for not bowing to the radical homosexual agenda.

Jesus christ, do you want to talk about shit done by the right wing? Let's not start this idiocy. I'm sure you fully support the "right" of businesses to discriminate and not hire blacks, that's cool, but to you, I say fuck off.

Thanks for the compliment but I'm not Jesus Christ, and to the rest of your bullshit, fuck you.

 

[BlackSand]

They shouldn't have a tax exempt status in the first place.

Oh well ... You can put your shoulda, coulda , woulda's in a in a pipe and smoke them for all I care.

.

 

[Judicial review]

religion does not have a monopoly on social contracts or constructs...in the USA...

It has the right to not perform them due to their religious beliefs. BOOM! You just got blown the fuck up.

You don't even understand, churches won't be forced to hold marriages.

It's an incremental step toward dismantling religion. Churches will be forced to marry homosexuals or be shut down.

You can't actually believe what you're post says, that's fear mongering and idiocy.

Tell that to the bakers and photographers who were sued for not bowing to the radical homosexual agenda.

They violated state PA laws. If your religion makes it impossible to do your job, find another job.

Church isn't job or a business. It's a protected non profit under the constitution to practice it's religion. It accepts donations not charges a members fee. You are what is wrong with a democracy not what is right.