Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The 10th amendment states that any law that is not written into federal law can be introduced at the state level. Since federal law says nothing about same-sex marriage being legal, any state can ban it under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution.
Now what will you do? Poor RuPaul.The 10th amendment states that any law that is not written into federal law can be introduced at the state level. Since federal law says nothing about same-sex marriage being legal, any state can ban it under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution.
1) It's irrelevantIt also states in the 14th amendment of the Constitution that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
The original text of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.constitution.congress.gov
www.usmessageboard.com
1) It's irrelevant
2) The decision of the constitutional court is legally void, because such an interpretation of the 14th amendment is impossible.
Did the Supreme Court commit fraud or is it just dementia?
How does the law on marriage as the union of a man and a woman differ from any other law? If we assume that the 14th Amendment protects against restrictions on implicit rights (that is, rights that follow from the absence of a prohibition), then any law in the United States is contrary to the...
Such an interpretation of the 14th Amendment is logically impossible.Well anti LGBT marriage laws can be declared unconstutional on the very basis that it spits on the equal protection clause.
www.usmessageboard.com
Based on this, the 14th amendment can only apply to explicit (explicitly declared) rights.
However, the right to same-sex marriage is nowhere explicitly written.
Permission for a different sexual orientation is also not written anywhere. Therefore, states can prohibit not only same-sex marriage, but also homosexuality as is
Well at one time stuff like women's rights like suffrage,equal protection for POC(people of color) and such were also not in the Constitution.
The US Constitution is a living breathing document which changes over time.
Like one time it was legal to keep slaves,but that got abolished by the Constitution.
Damn that is stupid! Laws that are based on a compelling government/societal interest, or at minimum have a rational basis do no vio;ate the 14th amendment. Examples that cometo mind are murder, robery, kidnapping, fraud. Laws that limit or deny rights arbitrarily where there is no rational reason DO VIOLATE the 14th. Bans on same sex marriage is an exampleSo simple even a cave man can understand itIf we assume that the 14th Amendment protects against restrictions on implicit rights (that is, rights that follow from the absence of a prohibition), then any law in the United States is contrary to the 14th Amendment, because any law restricts implicit rights.
What the fuck is it with you and same sex marriage and gay rights in general? What have they done to you? How does their existance effect your daily life? How many hours a day do you think about gay people and how disgusting they are? I suspect that you have some serious issues with your own sexuality. Your obsession is clearly an indication of emotional disturbanceThe 10th amendment states that any law that is not written into federal law can be introduced at the state level. Since federal law says nothing about same-sex marriage being legal, any state can ban it under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution.
If you follow the women's logic of the Supreme Court, you could not prohibit murder if it was not previously prohibited, because if murder is not prohibited, it is an implicit right and, according to their logic, falls under the 14th amendmentDamn that is stupid! Laws that are based on a compelling government/societal interest, or at minimum have a rational basis do no vio;ate the 14th amendment. Examples that cometo mind are murder, robery, kidnapping, fraud. Laws that limit or deny rights arbitrarily where there is no rational reason DO VIOLATE the 14th. Bans on same sex marriage is an exampleSo simple even a cave man can understand it
It has nothing to do with the matter, just your emotionsWhat the fuck is it with you and same sex marriage and gay rights in general? What have they done to you? How does their existance effect your daily life? How many hours a day do you think about gay people and how disgusting they are? I suspect that you have some serious issues with your own sexuality. Your obsession is clearly an indication of emotional disturbance
It has nothing to do with the matter, just your emotions
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
www.psychologytoday.com
Holy fucking shit! You are dangerous!If you follow the women's logic of the Supreme Court, you could not prohibit murder if it was not previously prohibited, because if murder is not prohibited, it is an implicit right and, according to their logic, falls under the 14th amendment
Bullshit! You are the emotional one. Emotionally disturbedIt has nothing to do with the matter, just your emotions
It's strange that gay advocates are trying to accuse someone of being gay, don't you think?Are you a in the closet gay?
I read the more someone hates gay people, the more likely they are to be gay or had a gay experience.
Women's right to vote is explicitly written into the constitution and falls under the 14th Amendment. That is, no state can abolish the right of women to vote at the local level.
Same-sex marriage rights are not written anywhere, so they are not regulated by the 14th Amendment.
This is the difference
I didn’t understand anything, but for fools, I explain once again: if implicit rights fall under the 14th amendment, then it is impossible to issue lawsIt is not whether same-sex marriage rights are written anywhere.
It is the fact that straight marriage is accepted and recognized. The 14th amendment provides for equal protection under the law.
