Sally Yates: A Long-Neck DUD

[toobfreak]

What did she "reveal"?....that she had no idea what she was talking about in refusing to defend the travel-ban.

Soooo, Tom, what then exactly did ol' Sally accomplish by giving up a very good paying cushy job refusing to uphold a travel ban that would be stricken down by the 9th Circuit in a few days anyway? She could have stuck around and continued to be an inside spy for the democrats!

 

[Valerie]

lies and personal attacks are all the trumpswabs ever have...

Funny. I was about to say the same thing about you . . . .

We must be looking at TWO different forums.

about me, huh? **** off, n00b.


please note, that's the very first time i've ever addressed you. NOW you can go play victim!

 

[Kosh]

lies and personal attacks are all the trumpswabs ever have...

Funny. I was about to say the same thing about you . . . .

We must be looking at TWO different forums.

about me, huh? **** off, n00b.


please note, that's the very first time i've ever addressed you. NOW you can go play victim!

Says the far left drone!

 

[Tom Horn]

Soooo, Tom, what then exactly did ol' Sally accomplish by giving up a very good paying cushy job refusing to uphold a travel ban that would be stricken down by the 9th Circuit in a few days anyway? She could have stuck around and continued to be an inside spy for the democrats!

That's true....at least until Sessions was confirmed. There's something more to her story and now that we had her testify under oath that she didn't leak, she could be in deep doodoo.

 

[Valerie]

lies and personal attacks are all the trumpswabs ever have...

Funny. I was about to say the same thing about you . . . .

We must be looking at TWO different forums.

about me, huh? **** off, n00b.


please note, that's the very first time i've ever addressed you. NOW you can go play victim!

Says the far left drone!

FAKE NEWS ^

 

[BlindBoo]

The Dems and liberal media said 0 illegal voters.

Kewl, More Fake News. 0 is such an absolute. I'll bet the number nationwide of illegals voting is much closer to 0 than 3 million.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

What did she "reveal"?....that she had no idea what she was talking about in refusing to defend the travel-ban.

Soooo, Tom, what then exactly did ol' Sally accomplish by giving up a very good paying cushy job refusing to uphold a travel ban that would be stricken down by the 9th Circuit in a few days anyway? She could have stuck around and continued to be an inside spy for the democrats!

She was true to her conscience and to the law ...Trump and his rubes [that would be you Sucker] do not have such a things as a "conscience" and the only law you all believe in is "Might Makes Right"
Do not whine about name calling you cheap sad weak Bimbo

 

[Divine Wind]

What did she "reveal"?....that she had no idea what she was talking about in refusing to defend the travel-ban.

Soooo, Tom, what then exactly did ol' Sally accomplish by giving up a very good paying cushy job refusing to uphold a travel ban that would be stricken down by the 9th Circuit in a few days anyway? She could have stuck around and continued to be an inside spy for the democrats!

An excellent question. Looking forward to a calm, cool and collected answer.

 

[Tom Horn]

Madcow has a giraffe neck too.......hmmmm. Is Yates even a real person or Rachael in drag?

 

[leftwinger]

circumstantial evidence of wrongdoing is so obvious

ahhh.........right. WikiLeaks posted DNC, Podesta emails. Veritas recorded some criminals. Now its' the the fault of DJT? Russians? I forget? Who did what exactly?

 

[Syriusly]

What did she "reveal"?....that she had no idea what she was talking about in refusing to defend the travel-ban.

Soooo, Tom, what then exactly did ol' Sally accomplish by giving up a very good paying cushy job refusing to uphold a travel ban that would be stricken down by the 9th Circuit in a few days anyway? She could have stuck around and continued to be an inside spy for the democrats!

LOL- there is less evidence of her being a 'spy' for the Democrats than there is of Trump being a spy for the Russians.....

In other words there isn't any.

 

[Syriusly]

What did she "reveal"?....that she had no idea what she was talking about in refusing to defend the travel-ban.

Soooo, Tom, what then exactly did ol' Sally accomplish by giving up a very good paying cushy job refusing to uphold a travel ban that would be stricken down by the 9th Circuit in a few days anyway? She could have stuck around and continued to be an inside spy for the democrats!

She was true to her conscience and to the law ...Trump and his rubes [that would be you Sucker] do not have such a things as a "conscience" and the only law you all believe in is "Might Makes Right"
Do not whine about name calling you cheap sad weak Bimbo

Yep- the Trumpsters get very pissy whenever anyone testifies and makes anyone question the legitimacy of their God-Child.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The incoming Administration is not allowed to talk to the Russian Ambassador.

I did not know that.

 

[Divine Wind]

Madcow has a giraffe neck too.......hmmmm. Is Yates even a real person or Rachael in drag?

Yates will always be better looking than Maddow. Heck, Yates' dog is better looking than Rachel.

Yates is smarter and more honorable too.

 

[Tom Horn]

To continue my conspiracy theory that Yates may not be a real person et al, I've come up with a reason she (if she is a "she") got herself fired. Nothing high falutin or fancy.....if she'd stayed in the DOJ she would have been subject to random polygraphs without notice. I believe they know Yates leaked classified information to the NYTimes. Trump is pretty sure it's her (if she is a "her") and so must Sessions. So by leaving the DOJ, she could refuse to comply with an order to be polygraphed (a spy named Polly Graff invented the lie detector machine) and evade capture.

 

[jc456]

There is no Russian and Trump collusion !

Correction- we don't know if there was any Russian and Trump collusion.

The FBI- and Congress are investigating whether there was any.

And Trumptards sure want to pretend that they aren't investigating.

You will never know because you will never find any evidence of it. You idiots will be "investigating it" until the end of time, and when asked about it, you'll say "We haven't found anything yet."

The President controls all of the investigative agencies and the Republicans control the legislative investigation entities. The Republicans have a majority on the Supreme Court. The "We haven't found anything yet" folks would be the Republicans and trump administration themselves. They know the whole claim is a farce, so they won't even attempt an investigation.

Then why is it being investigated?

Because the circumstantial evidence of wrongdoing is so obvious that for the Republicans to not investigate would be a scandal of epic proportions. That plus there are plenty of Republicans in favor to the congressional investigations and the FBI, DOJ and intelligence agencies would be breaking the law if they did not investigate. At some point, our institutions overrule politics of the day. The American system of politics and justice are stronger than any one person or group.

so what is the circumstantial evidence you are referring to? which ones, the same two John McCain and Mitch McConnell? LOL.

 

[Timmy]

lies and personal attacks are all the trumpswabs ever have...

If a woman is in their crosshairs, it's a guaranteed misogynistic attack. Always have to insult her looks . Ironic since she is a nice looking older woman.

 

[Divine Wind]

Yep- the Trumpsters get very pissy whenever anyone testifies and makes anyone question the legitimacy of their God-Child.

Correct, just like the Clintonites get very pissy whenever anyone testifies and makes anyone question the legitimacy of their "right" to lead. What do they have in common here? What, in your opinion, is the solution?

 

[Divine Wind]

lies and personal attacks are all the trumpswabs ever have...

If a woman is in their crosshairs, it's a guaranteed misogynistic attack. Always have to insult her looks . Ironic since she is a nice looking older woman.

LOL. Interesting that you had to throw in the adjective "older". What are you? 22?

 

[Divine Wind]

To continue my conspiracy theory that Yates may not be a real person et al, I've come up with a reason she (if she is a "she") got herself fired. Nothing high falutin or fancy.....if she'd stayed in the DOJ she would have been subject to random polygraphs without notice. I believe they know Yates leaked classified information to the NYTimes. Trump is pretty sure it's her (if she is a "her") and so must Sessions. So by leaving the DOJ, she could refuse to comply with an order to be polygraphed (a spy named Polly Graff invented the lie detector machine) and evade capture.

Anyone guilty of a crime should be prosecuted regardless of their political affiliation.

IF Yates leaked classified info, she should be prosecuted.

IF anyone in the Trump campaign, including Trump himself, did anything illicit with the Russians, they should be prosecuted too. Do you agree, Tom Horn?