Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
You must thing Trump briefs are like your moronic posts.All have been laughed out of court for being stupid.
That is what you have.
As always, you are very wrong again.
Oh, Trump's legal arguments have been a spectacular failure. Judge Matthew Brann had this to say:
One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.
And the circuit courts didn't have much use for Trump's legal arguments either:
Nor does the Campaign deserve an injunction to undo Pennsylvania’s certification of its votes. The Campaign’s claims have no merit. The number of ballots it specifically challenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters. Plus, tossing out millions of mail-in ballots would be drastic and unprecedented, disenfranchising a huge swath of the electorate and upsetting all down-ballot races too. That remedy would be grossly disproportionate to the procedural challenges raised. So we deny the motion for an injunction pending appeal.
And the Supreme Court tossed Trump's 'big one' out on its ass.
There's a reason too......the legal arguments were inept shit that would only convince sycophants and rubes.