Well, I have to admit I think I did a pretty good job the first time. I don't know what I would do to simplify it.
What, precisely, are you not understanding?
.
All of it.
First off, does the GOP really have only one of two choices? Couldn't they do both. Or neither. Or some third or fourth thing?
Second, how will the GOP jerk the country to the left? Hasn't the Democrat Party already done that? Why would the GOP jerk the country to the left? How would they even do that if they wanted to?
What do you mean by "doing the heavy lifting"? I assume you mean a steady patient sustained effort to make the case for whatever policies the GOP wants (The "GOP" is made up of individuals, many of whom want different and in many cases incompatible things). Do you think this isn't going on right now? Karl Rove writes a column in the WSJ. Non profit orgs stage meetings and organize protests. The list goes on and on.
So your post was a bunch of cliches and bumper sticker thoughts. I was hoping there was something deeper there.
In order:
Sure, there are shades of gray everywhere. But overall, a party needs to at least have one general direction. Right now, the party is battling itself, and while they may want to deny that, it's pretty clear. The Tea Party wants everything now, the rest of the party sees that just can't be done.
Second, you're absolutely right, shit. I meant "jerk the country to the right". My fault, thanks. Shit. Fixed.
Finally, by "heavy lifting" I mean that our problems are, at their foundation, cultural in nature, not political. This can't be reversed by mere politics; hearts and minds have to be changed. Look at Obamacare: Purely political, passed by one party. Now look how many people are against it, because the Democrats didn't change hearts and minds. That's much tougher and requires more patience than leveraging advantage for temporary political victories.
.