Viacheslav
Silver Member
- Mar 16, 2017
- 297
- 82
- 90
State contracts for the supply of an experimental-industrial batch of T-14 "Armata" tanks for testing were signed, said Colonel-General Oleg Salyukov.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
State contracts for the supply of an experimental-industrial batch of T-14 "Armata" tanks for testing were signed, said Colonel-General Oleg Salyukov.
The tank is rated the best and most modern.the USA is technologically 50 ahead of Muscovy, in software in 70 yearsWe're also still waiting on their new super carriers and hypersonic missiles.
Any... day... now...
What tank, and rated by who? You?The tank is rated the best and most modern.
Russian Armata tank 'is 20 years ahead of anything in the West' | Daily Mail OnlineWhat tank, and rated by who? You?The tank is rated the best and most modern.
Russian Armata tank 'is 20 years ahead of anything in the West' | Daily Mail OnlineWhat tank, and rated by who? You?The tank is rated the best and most modern.
Russia makes its own stuff.Provided the Russians can get the chips and software from the US; they are banned from it being sent at any cost
This is not the T-84 Oplot. The T-14 uses this Diesel engine:Provided the Russians can get the engines from the Ukranians. Good luck on that one. It uses a Ukranian helicopter engine turbine.
Don´t be that silly. Not only the US is able to make advanced weaponry.Russia is in the process of trying to do these things domestically but are way behind the power curve. The Russians have a tendancy to make claims that are on paper but get caught up some place. Plus, the Tank, if they build it locally, will cost as much as a front lined jet fighter. So far, it's estimated they have only 14 of these turkeys. They had a surplus of engines but with Ukraine refusing to sell them new engines, they have to come up with something else. I guess it wasn't too bright to invade Ukraine afterall.
Just keep hiding the tow rope where we can't see it. We might be duped into believing it just like the
Myasishchev M-4 hoax.
Russia makes its own stuff.Provided the Russians can get the chips and software from the US; they are banned from it being sent at any cost
This is not the T-84 Oplot. The T-14 uses this Diesel engine:Provided the Russians can get the engines from the Ukranians. Good luck on that one. It uses a Ukranian helicopter engine turbine.
12Н360 - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Don´t be that silly. Not only the US is able to make advanced weaponry.Russia is in the process of trying to do these things domestically but are way behind the power curve. The Russians have a tendancy to make claims that are on paper but get caught up some place. Plus, the Tank, if they build it locally, will cost as much as a front lined jet fighter. So far, it's estimated they have only 14 of these turkeys. They had a surplus of engines but with Ukraine refusing to sell them new engines, they have to come up with something else. I guess it wasn't too bright to invade Ukraine afterall.
Just keep hiding the tow rope where we can't see it. We might be duped into believing it just like the
Myasishchev M-4 hoax.
Russian Armata tank 'is 20 years ahead of anything in the West' | Daily Mail OnlineWhat tank, and rated by who? You?The tank is rated the best and most modern.
You are not serious and it appears to be clear now why you can´t take money for your offerings.Russia makes its own stuff.Provided the Russians can get the chips and software from the US; they are banned from it being sent at any cost
This is not the T-84 Oplot. The T-14 uses this Diesel engine:Provided the Russians can get the engines from the Ukranians. Good luck on that one. It uses a Ukranian helicopter engine turbine.
12Н360 - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Don´t be that silly. Not only the US is able to make advanced weaponry.Russia is in the process of trying to do these things domestically but are way behind the power curve. The Russians have a tendancy to make claims that are on paper but get caught up some place. Plus, the Tank, if they build it locally, will cost as much as a front lined jet fighter. So far, it's estimated they have only 14 of these turkeys. They had a surplus of engines but with Ukraine refusing to sell them new engines, they have to come up with something else. I guess it wasn't too bright to invade Ukraine afterall.
Just keep hiding the tow rope where we can't see it. We might be duped into believing it just like the
Myasishchev M-4 hoax.
What you are saying is that they are using an X Engine. The US gave up on that configuration in the early 40s. It's a dud. The lower two banks will have a bad problem of oil.
Yes, Russia can build modern military equipment if you factor in they are 20 years behind in almost all areas. Yes, your vaunted SU-57 is twenty years behind in everything and so is your Armata Tank. This is what happens when the Russians build it all by themselves.
And there are only 14 Armatas ever built and they aren't operational. They are incomplete. Shades of the Bounder on this one.
You are not serious and it appears to be clear now why you can´t take money for your offerings.Russia makes its own stuff.Provided the Russians can get the chips and software from the US; they are banned from it being sent at any cost
This is not the T-84 Oplot. The T-14 uses this Diesel engine:Provided the Russians can get the engines from the Ukranians. Good luck on that one. It uses a Ukranian helicopter engine turbine.
12Н360 - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Don´t be that silly. Not only the US is able to make advanced weaponry.Russia is in the process of trying to do these things domestically but are way behind the power curve. The Russians have a tendancy to make claims that are on paper but get caught up some place. Plus, the Tank, if they build it locally, will cost as much as a front lined jet fighter. So far, it's estimated they have only 14 of these turkeys. They had a surplus of engines but with Ukraine refusing to sell them new engines, they have to come up with something else. I guess it wasn't too bright to invade Ukraine afterall.
Just keep hiding the tow rope where we can't see it. We might be duped into believing it just like the
Myasishchev M-4 hoax.
What you are saying is that they are using an X Engine. The US gave up on that configuration in the early 40s. It's a dud. The lower two banks will have a bad problem of oil.
Yes, Russia can build modern military equipment if you factor in they are 20 years behind in almost all areas. Yes, your vaunted SU-57 is twenty years behind in everything and so is your Armata Tank. This is what happens when the Russians build it all by themselves.
And there are only 14 Armatas ever built and they aren't operational. They are incomplete. Shades of the Bounder on this one.
Did you know, by the way, that US aircraft in Syria do have Russian troll jets behind them?
Russische Piloten nach Einsatz in Syrien: "Waren immer Sieger bei Luftkämpfen mit US-Kampfjets"
You forget that there is no American airspace but only Syrian and the only foreign airfocre permitted to roam there is the Russian. Any other aircraft´s presence is a provocation. US aircraft hampered Russian jets and thus were acting as ISIL airforce. Russia can deploy many jets to Syria within hours.The Russians are more than a little over zealous. The only reason it hasn't turned into a shooting war in Syria (Russia is greatly outnumbered) is the restraint by the US Pilots. The deescalation line is there for a purpose that seems to be lost to the irrational behavior you seem to see as heroic. You seem to relish a limited war between the US and Russia. IF it came to that in Syria, you can bet pretty sure that the Russians would not fair very well. At the same time, the Syrian Government will cease to exist and Iran will be booted out. It will escalate well past a managed problem. I suggest you read the last book of the Bible. That just might bring it to fruition. The military leaders of both sides are aware of this and will try and prevent it from happening. Even if it means a limited shooting match that neither side can afford. You can kiss Syria and Iran goodbye even from that.
The Nato has currently nothing to offer. They are arming the Kurds although they promised Turkey they stopped it. Turkey would probably stand by and pick the winner.Given things as they are, I really don't have a clue whether Turkey will support Nato or just sit on it's hands. And neither do you. But I believe the Military Leaders will work hard to either not allow it to happen or minimize the scope. You arm chair Generals all talk the same way. You have no idea what the repercussions would be.
You forget that there is no American airspace but only Syrian and the only foreign airfocre permitted to roam there is the Russian. Any other aircraft´s presence is a provocation. US aircraft hampered Russian jets and thus were acting as ISIL airforce. Russia can deploy many jets to Syria within hours.The Russians are more than a little over zealous. The only reason it hasn't turned into a shooting war in Syria (Russia is greatly outnumbered) is the restraint by the US Pilots. The deescalation line is there for a purpose that seems to be lost to the irrational behavior you seem to see as heroic. You seem to relish a limited war between the US and Russia. IF it came to that in Syria, you can bet pretty sure that the Russians would not fair very well. At the same time, the Syrian Government will cease to exist and Iran will be booted out. It will escalate well past a managed problem. I suggest you read the last book of the Bible. That just might bring it to fruition. The military leaders of both sides are aware of this and will try and prevent it from happening. Even if it means a limited shooting match that neither side can afford. You can kiss Syria and Iran goodbye even from that.
The Nato has currently nothing to offer. They are arming the Kurds although they promised Turkey they stopped it. Turkey would probably stand by and pick the winner.Given things as they are, I really don't have a clue whether Turkey will support Nato or just sit on it's hands. And neither do you. But I believe the Military Leaders will work hard to either not allow it to happen or minimize the scope. You arm chair Generals all talk the same way. You have no idea what the repercussions would be.
Thank you frackers....
Russia can deploy the planes within hours. The start in Russia and land in Syria - deployed. Quite easy.You forget that there is no American airspace but only Syrian and the only foreign airfocre permitted to roam there is the Russian. Any other aircraft´s presence is a provocation. US aircraft hampered Russian jets and thus were acting as ISIL airforce. Russia can deploy many jets to Syria within hours.The Russians are more than a little over zealous. The only reason it hasn't turned into a shooting war in Syria (Russia is greatly outnumbered) is the restraint by the US Pilots. The deescalation line is there for a purpose that seems to be lost to the irrational behavior you seem to see as heroic. You seem to relish a limited war between the US and Russia. IF it came to that in Syria, you can bet pretty sure that the Russians would not fair very well. At the same time, the Syrian Government will cease to exist and Iran will be booted out. It will escalate well past a managed problem. I suggest you read the last book of the Bible. That just might bring it to fruition. The military leaders of both sides are aware of this and will try and prevent it from happening. Even if it means a limited shooting match that neither side can afford. You can kiss Syria and Iran goodbye even from that.
The Nato has currently nothing to offer. They are arming the Kurds although they promised Turkey they stopped it. Turkey would probably stand by and pick the winner.Given things as they are, I really don't have a clue whether Turkey will support Nato or just sit on it's hands. And neither do you. But I believe the Military Leaders will work hard to either not allow it to happen or minimize the scope. You arm chair Generals all talk the same way. You have no idea what the repercussions would be.
You mean within weeks. You seem to think there is some sort of Space Transporter. There isn't. Russia doesn't have the tanker fleet to get a large number of AC into Syria unless they were already there. Meanwhile, the US has large forces in Iraq, Kuwait, and Afghanistan and they have the tanker support already in place along with the Aerial Communications birds already in place.
Both would have to fly in reenforcements. Russia from Russia and the US from Europe. The US, with it's more numerous tanker force could do it within 72 hours. The Russians might do it in 3 days.By the time both countries get in a situation to actually send the reenforcements the shoot part is already done. And the Rebels far outnumber the Russian and Syrian forces. At that point, I think Israel will boot Iran clean back to Iran.
Neither the US nor Russia wants this to happen. It's going to take a lot more than one trigger happy pilot to bring this about.
Really....pretty simple.Russian econ is built on oil.....lower prices due to increase in supply = less money to Russain and terrorist states to buy weapons.....fortuttious since our armed forces are in disrepairThank you frackers....
Mano, you might want to expand that, if you will.
Russia can deploy the planes within hours. The start in Russia and land in Syria - deployed. Quite easy.
Really....pretty simple.Russian econ is built on oil.....lower prices due to increase in supply = less money to Russain and terrorist states to buy weapons.....fortuttious since our armed forces are in disrepairThank you frackers....
Mano, you might want to expand that, if you will.
Why would there be a war between us in Syria....we should leave......ISIS is crushedReally....pretty simple.Russian econ is built on oil.....lower prices due to increase in supply = less money to Russain and terrorist states to buy weapons.....fortuttious since our armed forces are in disrepairThank you frackers....
Mano, you might want to expand that, if you will.
The terrorists temporarily switched to Poppy fields until lately. They are losing that income. They have lost the lucrative Oil, draining the villages dry. They may have to get a job.
Russia is stretched pretty thin with Georgia, Ukraine and Syria. If Russia makes it a point then they will probably lose the Ukrainian holdings and maybe even Georgia. So the last thing on Russias mind is going head to head against the US in Syria. While the US will be hurt, it would be suicidal for Russia.