Russian missiles 'sink cargo ship carrying UK weapons for Ukraine'

[justoffal]

An underground bunker containing 56 Storm Shadow missiles, 32 Patriot air defense missiles and 53 ATACMS missiles was reportedly destroyed in Lutsk.
These missiles were delivered to Ukraine 5 days ago

Whoever gave zelensky the go ahead on the drone strike had better be prepared to pay for a shit ton of Ukrainian funerals.

 

[Zavulon]

Whoever gave zalensky the go ahead on the drone strike has better be prepared to pay for a shit run of Ukrainian funerals.

Not only Ukrainian. More likely - his own. I mean, British, French and American nuclear forces are even more vulnerable to this type of deniable proxy attacks.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Whoever gave zalensky the go ahead on the drone strike has better be prepared to pay for a shit run of Ukrainian funerals.

Zelensky didn't need approval from anyone, and Russia isn't doing anything differently from what it has done for the past three years. Deliberately targeting civilians.

 

[justoffal]

Zelensky didn't need approval from anyone, and Russia isn't doing anything differently from what it has done for the past three years. Deliberately targeting civilians.

He absolutely did need the permission...
There is no way he was able to pull that off with his own indigenous technology. He got that permission illegally from Lindsey Graham.

 

[AZrailwhale]

He absolutely did need the permission...
There is no way he was able to pull that off with his own indigenous technology. He got that permission illegally from Lindsey Graham.

What the Ukrainians did was intelligently use off the shelf technology. That is something they have excelled at throughout the entire war.

 

[Litwin]

Let them sink it.

DO YOU REMEMBER THEM , HOLE ?

 

[Litwin]

MSN

Russia unleashed a missile strike to 'sink' a cargo ship amid an unconfirmed claim it was carrying British weapons for use by Ukraine.

Two Iskander-M ballistic missiles hit the Panama-flagged container ship MSC LEVANTE F - reportedly Swiss-owned - soon after it arrived in Odesa on March 1, after making a stop in Turkey.

The report of the attack comes as British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer today hosts Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders to discuss the future of the wartorn nation following the Ukrainian president's televised spat with US president Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance.

Russian Telegram war channel Talipov Online said: 'It was established that in Turkey the ship loaded additional containers of two colours on board - red and yellow - which contained British sea drones and weapons from the Turkish NATO base.

'Upon arrival at the port of Odesa, the ship was hit by two missiles at berth number two at 18:00.

'After the strike detonations began, the cargo was completely destroyed, the ship sank.'

So, secondary explosions after the strike.

Meh, if you don't want your ships sunk, don't put weapons on them and send them to a war zone.

If it was carrying weapons, I'd say it was a legit target. That precedent was set in WW1 and has been solidified ever since.

Interesting that it was sunk at the port. Trying to create a hazard to navigation or block access to a pier/dock in addition to destroying the cargo?

Of course, a stationary target is easier to hit.

YOU ARE LYING AGAIN, WHY ?
REALITY :

 

[Litwin]

Zelensky:

"Guns? What guns? I lost all of mine in a tragic boating accident."

Thread 'Germany has confiscated the OIL tanker — part of putin’s “shadow 🇷🇺 fleet” — carrying a cargo of oil worth €40 million. A part of Trump´s game ?'

Mar 21, 2025

Good move There is no "shadow fleet." There’s a fleet of tankers transporting oil for the moscow-centered terror enterprise—and every single one of them can and should be impounded. Every. One. Of. Them.
yes, 'Decolonization of Moscow empire is the only way to end Moscow wars of conquest, And I don’t mean Putin´s imperialism, but Moscow imperialism in general , from Solzhenitsyn and #Brodsky to #Navalny and Dugin.

related :...

• Litwin

• 
• 

 

[Zavulon]

Zelensky didn't need approval from anyone, and Russia isn't doing anything differently from what it has done for the past three years. Deliberately targeting civilians.

Of course he need. Those who pay a girl, those say her what to do. He is merely a hired gun. And no, now we are in the situation "deniable proxy attacks against nuclear forces", so wait the Houthies (or anybody else) attack US B-52s at Diego Garcia airbase (or anywhere else), or attack again British Vanguard-class submarines at HMNB Clyde by the "Army Liberation of Scotland" (or by the unmanned boats from a cargo ship, passing by).

 

[Ringo]

 

[Zavulon]

It is not "in response". It is to prevent further attempts. "In response", highly likely, there will be Houthies attack against US bomber on Diego Garcia or unknown pirates will attack HMBN Clyde in Scotland.

 

[Crepitus]

MSN

Russia unleashed a missile strike to 'sink' a cargo ship amid an unconfirmed claim it was carrying British weapons for use by Ukraine.

Two Iskander-M ballistic missiles hit the Panama-flagged container ship MSC LEVANTE F - reportedly Swiss-owned - soon after it arrived in Odesa on March 1, after making a stop in Turkey.

The report of the attack comes as British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer today hosts Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders to discuss the future of the wartorn nation following the Ukrainian president's televised spat with US president Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance.

Russian Telegram war channel Talipov Online said: 'It was established that in Turkey the ship loaded additional containers of two colours on board - red and yellow - which contained British sea drones and weapons from the Turkish NATO base.

'Upon arrival at the port of Odesa, the ship was hit by two missiles at berth number two at 18:00.

'After the strike detonations began, the cargo was completely destroyed, the ship sank.'

So, secondary explosions after the strike.

Meh, if you don't want your ships sunk, don't put weapons on them and send them to a war zone.

If it was carrying weapons, I'd say it was a legit target. That precedent was set in WW1 and has been solidified ever since.

Interesting that it was sunk at the port. Trying to create a hazard to navigation or block access to a pier/dock in addition to destroying the cargo?

Of course, a stationary target is easier to hit.

Russia declaring war on the rest of Europe.