and how many did they do in the previous elections? why didn't obama, who knew of this heinous activity, stop it months ahead of time?
90% of the people did no such thing on net neutrality. if you knew what that really was you'd not likely be for it either. it's more subversive control of the net, not less. and if you didn't have issues pre-2015 then we just went back to those wild wild west days where we simply didn't have a problem. NN created a solution in search a problem and just assumed that people would take advantage of being able to charge / direct what they want.
was that an issue for you in 2010? 2012? 2015? if not, we just went back there. if so, what was it?
90% of the US wanted to keep it in place but the damn GOP voted to get rid of what 90% of the people wanted. you ever think these things through? the math alone says if 90% wanted it it would have happened.
that is a pretty bold reach, EW. you'd never allow such speculation the other way so i find it kinda funny you make stuff up then yell at trump for doing the same. if you don't make stuff up, tell me who said 90% of americans wanted net neutrality.
You lost credibility pointing your non-partisan finger at me IceBerg..
These Russians stole American identities by the thousands to make accounts on the Government website that allows Americans to weigh into a future vote.
They influenced who congress voted for Net Neutrality.. it was not Americans commenting to Congress..
And Blah Blah Blah 

on your partisen shit..this is about all Americans..You are so focused on what party someone supported and so ready to derail it , you are missing the important things.
Streaming is the future of watching TV..and now our internet providers can charge anything they want.. Netflix, Youtube will start charging you much more..
.
i find it funny you call me partisan but you have zero issue bending reality to ensure GOP BAD YOUR SIDE GOOD.
net neutrality. of course people wanted it because it was sold as YOU WILL GET SCREWED WITHOUT IT!!! when in fact its just a way the Gov can start to regulate it in the end, much like the FCC does airwaves now. CAN companies charge you more now with it repealed? yep. but they could in 2015 and at any time previous to this. are you aware of that? did comcast screw you over in 2014? did ANYONE screw you over, limit your surfing, block you from content you wanted??? just be honest and quit trying to "be right"?
did they?
competition will keep them from doing this cause if they try, i simply find another provider and move on and that company goes out of business. so in fact, if the gov would make it possible for me to have MORE choices for a provider vs. limit them as they do now it would be even less of a problem. so in fact, the gov created this potential by limiting your provider options so they can now fix a problem they created with more regulations.
that's all NN is. if you believe it to be something else stop watching fear driven sites pumping up your false impressions of what the law is and what it can actually do in the end.
now for 500k retweets. from twitter research statistics:
Every second, on average, around
6,000 tweets are tweeted on Twitter (visualize them here), which corresponds to over
350,000 tweets sent per minute,
500 million tweets per day and around
200 billion tweets per year.
so there are 500 MILLION tweets per a day and you're trying to say 500k retweets, which is .1% of the overall DAILY traffic somehow changed the course of the election.
500k retweets. This is YOUR NUMBER, eaglewings. if 500 MILLION tweets are done a day we're over 15 BILLION TWEETS A MONTH at this point. if this was going on for months as YOU STATE then 500k RETWEETS somehow took off over 30 BILLION tweets.
do the math, don't just get handed something and like it so you run with it. they call that fake news today.
you can get mad at me because i don't fall into scareville with you on every post you REPOST so you can try to scare other people into your horror, but if you stop and think, NN was a bag of crap pushed down to regulate even more how you surf the net and sold to you different. if i'm wrong don't just say BOO HOO YOU PARTISAN HACK - give me evidence of it happening from a non-attacking site. pull up the bill itself and show me where we are protected by this legislation and we're all going to die without it.
you know, like we'll all die from trump tax cuts.
so you're wrong on NN and i can show you technically but you'll ignore me. and you're wrong on 500k being anything as close to as "powerful" a number as you're trying to sell it off as. do the math, don't listen to me. how much traffic if 500k on twitter over the course of (2) months?
or just get mad and call me partisan and ignore me.