Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 23,508
- 11,186
- 950
In short, the use of depleted uranium rounds in Ukraine will be considered a nuclear attack, and will respond in kind. So... What are the gonna feed these Leopard tanks now..?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh they are? LOL... Nobody noticed.In short, the use of depleted uranium rounds in Ukraine will be considered a nuclear attack, and will respond in kind. So... What are the gonna feed these Leopard tanks now..?
Russia complaining about the environmental impacts of depleted uranium while they destroy occupied territory is disingenuousIt's amusing to see how some posters consider the Russian opinion on this issue as a matter of debate. If they consider the use of depleted uranium as analogous to the use of a dirty bomb... Don't say you weren't warned. And one can't really say they're wrong about it. Depleted uranium ***** lots of shit up. And this is land Russia claims as its territory, and plans on keeping it. Ignore their warning at your own peril...
Russia is already using depleted uranium shells. If you look at the poor military ability of Russia and that of the rest of the world, it looks like the peril would be Russia's.It's amusing to see how some posters consider the Russian opinion on this issue as a matter of debate. If they consider the use of depleted uranium as analogous to the use of a dirty bomb... Don't say you weren't warned. And one can't really say they're wrong about it. Depleted uranium ***** lots of shit up. And this is land Russia claims as its territory, and plans on keeping it. Ignore their warning at your own peril...
Time will tell. You have a link for Russian use of depleted uranium? Truly curious. But... There's a big difference between choosing to use nuclear material on your own land ( the position Russia takes) vs. a foreign power doing so on your land...Russia is already using depleted uranium shells. If you look at the poor military ability of Russia and that of the rest of the world, it looks like the peril would be Russia's.
Correct, they use depleted uranium rounds for the density of the metal not nuclear capability.Depleted Uranium is not a nuke
Hence the term “depleted”
Still radioactive, and tantamount to a "dirty bomb" which is Russias contention...
While Russia might take the position that they are using the depleted uranium on it's own land, it is a false flag argument used historically by despots like Putin when they want to acquire a neighboring country. Hitler used this argument early on as an excuse for invasion. Perhaps you shouldn't just blindly follow Putin and instead think for yourself.Time will tell. You have a link for Russian use of depleted uranium? Truly curious. But... There's a big difference between choosing to use nuclear material on your own land ( the position Russia takes) vs. a foreign power doing so on your land...
Enough depleted uranium rounds ARE extremely toxic. An uncle of mine who used to work at Picatinny arsenal in Delware talked extensively with me about this. It is still not unlike a dirty bomb. A radioactive one. And it would run the risk of poisoning ukrainians not just Russians. In fact, more likely since the war is mostly on Ukrainian soil. Ukrainian children will end up dying because of it.Depleted Uranium is not a nuke
Hence the term “depleted”
I do. And neither I, nor the US government is in a position to dictate terms to Russia. If they say they'll use this as a justification for escalation in kind... Prudence demands that it's taken into consideration.While Russia might take the position that they are using the depleted uranium on it's own land, it is a false flag argument used historically by despots like Putin when they want to acquire a neighboring country. Hitler used this argument early on as an excuse for invasion. Perhaps you shouldn't just blindly follow Putin and instead think for yourself.
Picatinny is in NJEnough depleted uranium rounds ARE extremely toxic. An uncle of mine who used to work at Picatinny arsenal in Delware talked extensively with me about this. It is still not unlike a dirty bomb. A radioactive one. And it would run the risk of poisoning ukrainians not just Russians. In fact, more likely since the war is mostly on Ukrainian soil. Ukrainian children will end up dying because of it.
Not talking about the air. I'm talking about groundwater. Big difference. Do you have any idea of the firing rate F weapons that use depleted uranium rounds?? Russia is not using dirty bombs in this war so far, but I think it's a matter of time before the Biden administration gives Ukraine whatever sick stuff they need keep the illegal U.S. sponsored surrogate government in office. The Biden administration will probably use dirty bombs just to frame Russia and CNN will be on site to document it.Picatinny is in NJ
Depleted rounds are extremely high density to penetrate armor. They are not released into the surrounding Atmosphere like a dirty bomb would be.
War is not friendly to the environment, small quantities of depleted uranium are insignificant compared to what Russia is doing in this war
Depleted uranium has been used in tanks and missiles for decadesNot talking about the air. I'm talking about groundwater. Big difference. Russia is not using dirty bombs in this war so far, but I think it's a matter of time before the Biden administration gives Ukraine whatever sick stuff they need keep the illegal U.S. sponsored surrogate government in office. The Biden administration will probably use dirty bombs just to frame Russia and CNN will be on site to document it.
Not officially. Don't you think governments hang on to their best weapons at the expense of truth? No? Couldn't be, huh?Depleted uranium has been used in tanks and missiles for decades
It is not a WMD