Russia could destroy Ukraine in a day without using nuclear weapons

US and Ukey Nazis fleeing

Total Carnage as Ukey army dissolves

ā€œItā€™s winter and the positions are open; thereā€™s nowhere to hide,ā€ said a Ukrainian soldier from the unit with the call sign Rusin.

At one frontline hospital in the Donbas, the morgue was packed with the bodies of Ukrainian soldiers in white plastic bags. In another hospital, stretchers with wounded troops covered in gold foil thermal blankets crowded the corridors, and a steady stream of ambulances arrived from the front nearly all day long."

 
Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and author. He formerly held a sub-cabinet office in the United States federal government as well as teaching positions at several U.S. universities. He is a promoter of supply-side economics and an opponent of recent U.S. foreign policy.

Roberts received a doctorate from the University of Virginia where he studied under G. Warren Nutter. He worked as an analyst and adviser at the United States Congress where he was credited as the primary author of the original draft of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. He was the United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Ronald Reagan and ā€“ after leaving government ā€“ held the William E. Simon chair in economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies for ten years and served on several corporate boards. A former associate editor at The Wall Street Journal, his articles have also appeared in The New York Times and Harper's, and he is the author of more than a dozen books and a number of peer-reviewed papers.

According to western whores MS presstitutes he's an anti-semite, paid by Putin troll, idiot, Trump lover,bigot, criminal, insane, etc etc etc


Paul Craig Roberts

Moon of Alabama has proven to be a reliable source of reporting on the conflict in Ukraine. The posting of November 23 indicates that some part of the Russian government or military has finally realized that Russia is at war. You can read the account here: MoA - Ukraine - Lights Out, No Water And Soon No Heat

The eight-month old Kremlin policy of protecting Ukraine from attack, thus helping Ukraine to conduct war against the Russian forces, seems to have come to an end. The infrastructureā€“power, transportation, waterā€“of Ukraine is being shut down. The real war Russian attacks on Ukraineā€™s ability to function have gradually escalated, resulting in wider and more serious damage. It seems that the Russians donā€™t want to destroy everything unless the West and its puppet Ukraine government fail to come to their senses.

The Western whore media, of course, doesnā€™t report the true situation. The Western presstitutes are a propaganda ministry and have created a picture of Russian defeat. It would be difficult to identify the worst liar in the Western media as there are endless candidates, but the UK Telegraphā€™s Charles Moore is a leading candidate for posting the most far-fetched reports: See, for example,ā€ Vladimir Putinā€™s only hope now is to terrify the West into negotiating away Ukraineā€™s victories.ā€ Vladimir Putinā€™s only hope now is to terrify the West into negotiating away Ukraineā€™s victories The Telegraph also tells us that ā€œUkraine could reach Crimea by Christmasā€ Russia-Ukraine war: Ukraine 'could reach Crimea by Christmas'

American so-called ā€œRussian expertsā€ spread the same delusions.

Consequently, the Western peoples have a totally false picture of the situation.
Russia could destroy Ukraine in a day without using nuclear weapons. The Kremlinā€™s restraintā€“in my view a strategic blunder as it enabled the West to get involved and widen the warā€“in Ukraine has a number of legitimate reasons. Ukraine and the population there have been a part of Russia for centuries. There is much intermarriage. Most Ukrainians are not favorable to the neo-Nazis who have dominated Ukraine since the US overthrew the government in 2014 and have suffered at their hands. The Kremlin doesnā€™t want a poverty-stricken ruin of a country on its border, and the Kremlin doesnā€™t want the responsibility for rebuilding Ukraineā€™s infrastructure.

It is inconceivable to me that ā€œexpertsā€ and ā€œreportersā€ in the West are so stupid and corrupt to have written the ridiculous accounts of the conflict that bear their names. It is total nonsense and has encouraged the false belief that Russia can be defeated and that ā€œUkraine can be in Crimea by Christmas.ā€

That such absurd propaganda can be effective can result in the US/NATO putting boots on the ground, and then we have World War III.


From Washingtonā€™s standpoint, the more Ukraine is destroyed the better. If Putin finally abandons his half-way measures and gets down to real war, the war will soon be over. If Washington can prevent Zelensky from surrendering until Ukraine is destroyed, Washington gets the benefit of the economic and financial drain on Russia that rebuilding will impose. From Washingtonā€™s standpoint, the more problems for Russia the better regardless of the cost to Ukrainians.

What we are witnessing is the enormous inhumanity of Washington and the NATO capitals. It is unjust that it is Ukraine that is paying the cost of Western inhumanity and not Washington and the European capitals.

Even if Russia was able to destroy the Ukraine cities with bombs and missiles in a day, that would not win the war. It would continue as a Gorilla war with the West supplying Ukraine forces. However, would the cost in money and Russia lives be worth it to Russia?

Putin can't negotiate. Moscow controlled only 16.% of Ukrainian territory at the end of 2022, compared to 24% at the end of March, at the height of its advance āˆ’ including 6% of territory already occupied. So far Russia's war against Ukraine has been a total failure and so it must continue until Putin can declare some kind of victory. Ukraine has no option but to continue or see the country destroyed by Russia. I expect this war to go on for years.
 
Last edited:
Could?

Not without setting aside all the mutually agreed upon limitations of the war between Russia and America.

This is the discussion that needs to take place on this board.

And too, the gradual dispensing with many of the limitations, until Russia faces defeat and has to dispense with the ultimate limitation?

No US propaganda efforts are ever going to convince Russia that the enemy isn't America!
The US is not going to involve itself in the war other than suppling weaponry. Putin wants a cold with the west, not a hot one.
 
The US is not going to involve itself in the war other than suppling weaponry. Putin wants a cold with the west, not a hot one.
Last night's speech was telling in that America's war against Russia was played down to the point of saying nothing much more than that America will not stop it's support of the Ukraine. No victory propaganda.
 
Last night's speech was telling in that America's war against Russia was played down to the point of saying nothing much more than that America will not stop it's support of the Ukraine. No victory propaganda.
Because victory is assured, there is no need for victory propaganda.
 
Last night's speech was telling in that America's war against Russia was played down to the point of saying nothing much more than that America will not stop it's support of the Ukraine. No victory propaganda.
And that is exactly what America's position should be. We'll support the Ukraine, but we're not going to fight their war.
 
And that is exactly what America's position should be. We'll support the Ukraine, but we're not going to fight their war.
It is not just their war, just as the Nazi attack on Czechoslovakia was not just their war. The Russian invasion of Ukraine occurred in the context of Russia violating nuclear treaty, investing heavily in hypersonic missiles to gain an advantage in the event of nuclear war, demands that NATO withdraw from eastern Europe and now threats of nuclear attacks on the UK, Germany and the US, all the while Putin proclaiming this is the start of a new world order in which Russia will sit at the top and the western democracies will just fade away.

This said, so long as the West provides Ukraine with appropriate weapons in appropriate quantities, there is no possibility the US or other western states will have to fight, but mistakenly believing the West has nothing to lose if Russia wee to win could lead to a slackening of support for Ukraine, and Russia's only path to victory runs through a slackening of support for Ukraine.
 
Ruzzian bot.

What exactly do you like to say to me? That you are not able to be a realist? Or that you feel well with your mistakes? Or that you never in your life spoke with a real German?




Every thing has three sides: One positive, one negative and one funny.
Karl Valentin
 
Last edited:
Last night's speech was telling in that America's war against Russia was played down to the point of saying nothing much more than that America will not stop it's support of the Ukraine. No victory propaganda.
America is not at war with Russia you idiot.
 
It is not just their war, just as the Nazi attack on Czechoslovakia was not just their war.

Give me a clear answer why this unstable construct from the winners of world war 1 not was called "Czecho-Germano-Slovakia". Why was the second greatest group of people - who had also lived since a longer time there than all others - ignored after world war 1 and was either murdered or displaced (=genocided) after world war 2?
 
Last edited:
Give me a clear answer why this unstable construct from the winners of world war 1 not was called "Czecho-Germano-Slovakia". Why was the second greatest group of people - who had also lived since a longer time there than all others - ignored after world war 1 and was either murdered or displaced (=genocided) after world war 2?
Regardless of what you may imagine was happening in Czechoslovakia, it did not provide grounds for the Nazi invasion, just as Putin's nonsensical complaints about Ukraine did not provide grounds for his invasion of Ukraine, and just as Germany was pushed back behind its borders Russia must be pushed back behind its borders or the whole notion of sovereignty becomes meaningless and we live in a world not ruled by law but only by the principle, might makes right.
 
Idiot. A rapist is by the way for us not a man.
In the Red Army they shot people for rape. Not always, but such behavior was strictly forbidden.
In any army, the rape of civilians is not welcome. First of all, because military regulations do not provide for it, and any behavior of a soldier that is not provided for in military regulations cannot be approved, because it violates discipline, the basis of any army.
By the behavior of German soldiers and their allies on Soviet territory and the official policy of genocide of russians, the population of Germany deserved the most cruel treatment. And by the way, the allies proposed to make Germany a "potato field" and the total bombing of Hamburg and Dresden is an example.
The germans were lucky, that the country with the most humanistic, internationalist ideology of communism was fighting against them. That's why in 1944 Comrade Stalin put forward the thesis that "Hitlers come and go, but the German people remain." That is why statements of scoundrels like you about "millions raped" are nothing but a revival of Goebbels propaganda.
 
A counterattack by the German II SS Panzer Corps failed to dislodge the British Second Army around Caen. When Gerd von Rundstedt phoned Berlin to report the failure, Chief of Staff Wilhelm Keitel purportedly asked, "What shall we do?", to which Rundstedt replied, "Make peace, you fools!"
 
Last edited:
Regardless of what you may imagine was happening in Czechoslovakia, it did not provide grounds for the Nazi invasion,

What's morally a totally wrong statement. Germany had every right to bring back Bohemia to Germany because it always had been Germany (and/or Austria) since Germans exists. The language of the Checks and the Slowaks always was able to be used in the courts of Bohemia. When the Chzechs ruled after world war 1 the Germans suddenly had not been allowed any longer to use their language in public.

Your form of argument says by the way also very clear that you and your allies not had any right to genocide for example the Bohemians (you genocided much more than only this nation), to take their country and to let pay all other Germans for this and similar crimes which you and your allies had done in, between and after world war 1+2.

just as Putin's nonsensical complaints about Ukraine did not provide grounds for his invasion of Ukraine,

Partially. The situation and status of the Crimea is indeed a little strange. But it is nevertheless a clear break of internatonal laws what Russia did do.

and just as Germany was pushed back behind its borders

Bohemia was always Germany since it had been existing. You wiped out Bohemia.

Russia must be pushed back behind its borders

no comment

or the whole notion of sovereignty becomes meaningless

"Sovereignity" is meaningless for the USA. You have everywhere soldiers in the world. And since 9/11 Germany follows this bad example of the USA. I would prefer to live in a world where no soldier has any right to leave the own country - except a world government would send them. And this world government is not able to be only the USA.

and we live in a world not ruled by law but only by the principle, might makes right.

For some people on our planet is always only sunday - and others never have a sunday.
 
Last edited:
In the Red Army they shot people for rape. Not always, but such behavior was strictly forbidden. ...

I spoke after the Russians attacked the Ukraine again with an old woman who had been a child in this time of history. She told me very detailed what she saw when she had been a child. She saw Russian soldiers in the end or after world war 2 systematically and groupwise rape German women. She saw also German women who did do suicide to end this tortures.

Again: You have absolutelly not any reason to be proud on the Red Army.
 
Last edited:
It is foolish to think Putin believes what he tells the Russian people.

So you think Putin thinks the USA is not in war with Russia but he tells the Russians that he thinks the USA is in war with Russia. Does this now mean he will send or not send intercontinental nukes to the USA because he thinks he is in war with the USA or because he thinks he is not in war with the USA?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top