Rules regarding accusations of paedophilia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not allowed to criticize?


Seems like critique is allowed.



Critique is clearly allowed, to the point of genocide.

IMHO

The next pogram will come from the US. Certainly not Ukraine.

Because they killed almost all the Jews there already.
uh. .. I think you have one too many tabs open there Ropey.

:auiqs.jpg:
 
So, if all you do is dress up a boy in girl’s clothing, that’s OK?
It's not for me, but if a parent wants to do that to their own child with their consent, usually trying to market the kid in a way to make money off of it, there isn't much you can do unless it evolves into actual physical abuse.
 
Basically if we think you are using it to imply a member is pedo, we will act on it. I strongly recommend you do NOT call a member a groomer in the context of children or you risk an infraction.

That doesn’t mean you can’t talk about grooming and groomers, just don’t call a member that. If we think you are using Disney for that purpose, you take the same risk.

It’s like porn…we can’t always define it, but we know when we see it.
Hell...there shouldn't be a rule against calling anyone anything.

Because of this very problem...you get a wanker like Tommy Taint crying crocodile tears because someone might possibly called him a bad word that he doesn't like... solely to use the power structure to silence the detractors of and agenda he supports...mostly because the detractors tactic is working.

If you can call someone a wanker or a nazi or a fuckchop or a cracker or a peckerwood...you should equally be able to call someone a groomer, a pedo or a ****.
 
are they promoting preteen sex?
I wouldn't be the expert on every case, but I have heard that some or many employees working at Disney actually DO have child-criminal backgrounds.


That makes it rather a hard topic to debate now if the word Groomer if used in the context of Disney is considered an "infraction."
 
Hell...there shouldn't be a rule against calling anyone anything.

Because of this very problem...you get a wanker like Tommy Taint crying crocodile tears because someone might possibly called him a bad word that he doesn't like... solely to use the power structure to silence the detractors of and agenda he supports...mostly because the detractors tactic is working.

If you can call someone a wanker or a nazi or a fuckchop or a cracker or a peckerwood...you should equally be able to call someone a groomer, a pedo or a ****.

I've never known anyone to get hurt by a word, in fact, growing up, I was taught:

"Sticks and Stones may break my bones but NAMES will never hurt me!"

The me generation created by the progressive left sure has turned out a bunch of WEENIES.
 
:lol:

But that's where your best thinking gets you.

Wrong.
oh. . . I get it, it was in reaction to toobfreak's meme.

IMO, I don't think that was a generalization of the entire Jewish nation. It was more targeted at the criminal organization. Don't be so touchy.

When folks slag Italian gangsters, they aren't slagging all Italians. :rolleyes:

The Koch Brothers are Dutch. The Rockefellers are German, from the Rhineland. The Morgan family came out of Whales. William Henry Gates II was the son of a gold prospector. . . . pretty sure he weren't a Jew though. The elites, whether they are old money or new, come from all different background here in America. The Astor's are from Germany and England. The Du Ponts are French protestants. And the Vanderbilt's seem to be devil worshiping atheists going back generations. . . :auiqs.jpg:

. . . so that leaves us with Soros and Rockefeller. . . :rolleyes:

And a plethora of other new money. . .

Don't be so quick to get triggered.
 
oh. . . I get it, it was in reaction to toobfreak's meme.

IMO, I don't think that was a generalization of the entire Jewish nation. It was more targeted at the criminal organization. Don't be so touchy.

When folks slag Italian gangsters, they aren't slagging all Italians. :rolleyes:

The Koch Brothers are Dutch. The Rockefellers are German, from the Rhineland. The Morgan family came out of Whales. William Henry Gates II was the son of a gold prospector. . . . pretty sure he weren't a Jew though. The elites, whether they are old money or new, come from all different background here in America. The Astor's are from Germany and England. The Du Ponts are French protestants. And the Vanderbilt's seem to be devil worshiping atheists going back generations. . . :auiqs.jpg:

. . . so that leaves us with Soros and Rockefeller. . . :rolleyes:

And a plethora of other new money. . .

Don't be so quick to get triggered.
tl;dr
 
That makes it rather a hard topic to debate now if the word Groomer if used in the context of Disney is considered an "infraction."
.

It's all semantics in fantasyland ... :yapyapyapf:

It's like trying to capture the moral high ground in an outhouse.
They want you to call someone what they aren't and avoid calling them what they aren't at the same time.

.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be the expert on every case, but I have heard that some or many employees working at Disney actually DO have child-criminal backgrounds.


That makes it rather a hard topic to debate now if the word Groomer if used in the context of Disney is considered an "infraction."
That makes it rather a hard topic to debate now if the word Groomer if used in the context of Disney is considered an "infraction."

Really?

Just because SOME Disney employees have records, doesn't make ALL of Disney child predators.
 
^ So, let the some go for the good of the all?

R.jpg
 
Really?

Just because SOME Disney employees have records, doesn't make ALL of Disney child predators.
It doesn't, but it sure does illustrate how often pedophiles arrive in situations where they are surrounded by children, or even worse - in a position of trust and authority over them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top