Rules regarding accusations of paedophilia

[Tommy Tainant]

Could a Mod please clarify how this rule is being enforced on the site ?
My observation is that it isnt being enforced at all.

 

[Moonglow]

Could a Mod please clarify how this rule is being enforced on the site ?
My observation is that it isnt being enforced at all.

It is by some mods while being used by coded words. All you can do as s report it and maybe some day they may not allow it.

 

[Auld Phart]

as stated before:

One problem.

'Grooming' is not just done by pedophiles.

It is also done by the 'trans' and LQG+ members of society.

When we get a report, or see the see the term groomer used, we check the reference.

If it refers to pedo, they get deleted and warned.
if pedo is not part of the conversation, no action is taken.

 

[Moonglow]

Disneys is also code word for pedophile also.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Who else agrees with me that there is something very fucked up about the fact that those who are willfully and knowingly complicit in the sexual grooming and abuse of children are allowed to openly defend and advocate for such, but any of us who dare to call them out on it risk being sanctioned and censored for it?

I'm generally not in favor of censorship, but if we're not to be allowed to call out supporters of child abuse for what they clearly are, then perhaps fairness demands that it also not be allowed to defend or advocate for such abuse, don't you think?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

as stated before:

One problem.

'Grooming' is not just done by pedophiles.

It is also done by the 'trans' and LQG+ members of society.

When we get a report, or see the see the term groomer used, we check the reference.

If it refers to pedo, they get deleted and warned.
if pedo is not part of the conversation, no action is taken.

I find that to be a ridiculous argument. All groomers are paedos. That is why they are grooming. And that is why the word grooming is being used by these idiots..

All you are doing is giving people a get out from their accusations. You show yourself to be hopelessly ou of touch Will.

Perhaps you could explain where I rank on your LGBT scale when I am being accused of grooming. I am a married man and a father of 3.
I am not trans or any other variation. So when I am called a groomer the obvious assumption is that I am being accused of being a paedo.
There is no other interpretation.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Who else agrees with me that there is something very fucked up about the fact that those who are willfully and knowingly complicit in the sexual grooming and abuse of children are allowed to openly defend and advocate for such, but any of us who dare to call them out on it risk being sanctioned and censored for it?

I'm generally not in favor of censorship, but if we're not to be allowed to call out supporters of child abuse for what they clearly are, then perhaps fairness demands that it also not be allowed to defend or advocate for such abuse, don't you think?

This is a great example. I know that Bob is stupid but it shouldnt give him the right to call me or others a paedo. He makes this acusation every week.
Sometimes I ask him for proof of this but he can never back it up.
It is wrong and should be dealt with.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I find that to be a ridiculous argument. All groomers are paedos. That is why they are grooming. And that is why the word grooming is being used by these idiots..

All you are doing is giving people a get out from their accusations. You show yourself to be hopelessly ou of touch Will.

Perhaps you could explain where I rank on your LGBT scale when I am being accused of grooming. I am a married man and a father of 3.
I am not trans or any other variation. So when I am called a groomer the obvious assumption is that I am being accused of being a paedo.
There is no other interpretation.

Those who promote depraved sexual perversions to young children's; if they are not pedophile themselves, then they undeniably are, at the very least, willfully complicit in pedophilia.

If you don't want to be accused of being a pedophile, perhaps you could be wary of who you defend doing what to children.

Otherwise, you should expect to be known by the company that you keep.

 

[Moonglow]

Who else agrees with me that there is something very fucked up about the fact that those who are willfully and knowingly complicit in the sexual grooming and abuse of children are allowed to openly defend and advocate for such, but any of us who dare to call them out on it risk being sanctioned and censored for it?

I'm generally not in favor of censorship, but if we're not to be allowed to call out supporters of child abuse for what they clearly are, then perhaps fairness demands that it also not be allowed to defend or advocate for such abuse, don't you think?

I doubt very seriously anyone at USMB defends or participates in pedophilia.

 

[Oddball]

This is a great example. I know that Bob is stupid but it shouldnt give him the right to call me or others a paedo. He makes this acusation every week.
Sometimes I ask him for proof of this but he can never back it up.
It is wrong and should be dealt with.

But those of us who want nothing to do with Europe's endless military squabbles are Putin stooges.

Yup, I see what you did there.

 

[Moonglow]

Those who promote depraved sexual perversions to young children's; if they are not pedophile themselves, then they undeniably are, at the very least, willfully complicit in pedophilia.

If you don't want to be accused of being a pedophile, perhaps you could be wary of who you defend doing what to children.

Otherwise, you should expect to be known by the company that you keep.

Does a defense attorney become accused and charged with the same charges as their client when defending them in court?

 

[Auld Phart]

I find that to be a ridiculous argument. All groomers are paedos. That is why they are grooming. And that is why the word grooming is being used by these idiots..

All you are doing is giving people a get out from their accusations. You show yourself to be hopelessly ou of touch Will.

Perhaps you could explain where I rank on your LGBT scale when I am being accused of grooming. I am a married man and a father of 3.
I am not trans or any other variation. So when I am called a groomer the obvious assumption is that I am being accused of being a paedo.
There is no other interpretation.

All groomers are paedos.

Hardly.

Some groomers try to convert people into their lifestyle, (trans, gay, etc), and sex with preteens is not their goal.

and, pedophilia is sex involving an adult and a preteen child.

I've had people on here claim Roy Moore, Gaetz, and others are pedos.

They aren't, unless they were soliciting preteens for sex.

I don't agree with them focusing attention on teenagers, but it is NOT pedophilia.

 

[Moonglow]

But those of us who want nothing to do with Europe's endless military squabbles are Putin stooges.

Yup, I see what you did there.

Off topic.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I doubt very seriously anyone at USMB defends or participates in pedophilia.

Then you are blind.

 

[Moonglow]

Then you are blind.

Hardly

 

[Coyote]

Basically if we think you are using it to imply a member is pedo, we will act on it. I strongly recommend you do NOT call a member a groomer in the context of children or you risk an infraction.

That doesn’t mean you can’t talk about grooming and groomers, just don’t call a member that. If we think you are using Disney for that purpose, you take the same risk.

It’s like porn…we can’t always define it, but we know when we see it.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Basically if we think you are using it to imply a member is pedo, we will act on it. I strongly recommend you do NOT call a member a groomer in the context of children or you risk an infraction.

That doesn’t mean you can’t talk about grooming and groomers, just don’t call a member that. If we think you are using Disney for that purpose, you take the same risk.

It’s like porn…we can’t always define it, but we know when we see it.

And yet is is perfectly fine for perverted filth to openly defend and support sexual grooming of children.

The violation of forum rule sonly comes into play when someone else observes that that is what is happening.

What is wrong with this picture?

Why should one who openly defends and advocates the sexual grooming, exploitation, or other abuse of children be protected by this forum's rules from being called out on it?

 

[Fueri]

I find that to be a ridiculous argument. All groomers are paedos. That is why they are grooming. And that is why the word grooming is being used by these idiots..

All you are doing is giving people a get out from their accusations. You show yourself to be hopelessly ou of touch Will.

Perhaps you could explain where I rank on your LGBT scale when I am being accused of grooming. I am a married man and a father of 3.
I am not trans or any other variation. So when I am called a groomer the obvious assumption is that I am being accused of being a paedo.
There is no other interpretatpesos.

Wrong.

All groomers are not pedos.

Sometimes, quite often obviously, they're just morons supporting the latest narrative. Defending actions that would be undertaken by groomers etc.

We understand why the left hates this so much, although after years of being called Nazis in the same derogatory vein, of which the OP is extremely guilty, I find it laughable that suddenly he is concerned about the use of this sort of loaded pejorative language.

Whiny little bitch.

 

[Briss]

Could a Mod please clarify how this rule is being enforced on the site ?
My observation is that it isnt being enforced at all.

Why are you opposed to joe being called out for not being able to keep his hands and face off little girls?

 

[Coyote]

And yet is is perfectly fine for perverted filth to openly defend and support sexual grooming of children.

The violation of forum rule sonly comes into play when someone else observes that that is what is happening.

What is wrong with this picture?

Why should one who openly defends and advocates the sexual grooming, exploitation, or other abuse of children be protected by this forum's rules from being called out on it?

One of USMB’s strongest rules is the pedo one. Unless someone is openly and specifically advocating pedo, and you clear it with moderation (read flacaltenn ‘s post) then you run a moderation risk trying to get around the rule. It really is that simple.