"H.R. 1526, the No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025.

One man in particular who was mistakenly deported

He was an illegal alien, right?
He was deported, right?
What's the problem?

The only issue is that he was deported using the wrong tool
The SCOTUS is apparently trying to insure that doesn't become a precedent.
 
Sad sack skittle hair person.
1744383772475.webp
 
And the the power of the Supreme Court flows to the lower courts. Just as the power of the executive flows to its internal entities.

Their disputes are with executive orders issued by the President. Only the SC is at the equivalent level to handle that.
 

House Repubs are on board with the false narrative the WH is trying to foment regarding lower court rulings that have blocked or delayed the implementation of the regime's draconian, radical, agenda. Hence the bill they passed and the name they gave it. There are a number of talking points reverberating around the right wing echo chamber in support of this. "Legislating from the bench," "judicial overreach," "unelected, activist judges," blah, blah, blah. trump supporters parrot them like a mantra.

One of the more high profile, consequential cases being the regime's deportation of around 270 men to an El Salvadorian gulag. One man in particular who was mistakenly deported posing a problem for Team trump. Because the SC ruling on the return of Abrego Garcia to the US drove a truck over the false narrative by reaffirming lower courts have all the authority they need to order the regime to do what it is told when it commits executive overreach.
The right's war on the rule of law and Constitution continues.
 
The SC should deal with anything involving the executive branch, as the equivalent level of the judicial branch.

District courts were never meant to be able to apply rulings outside their district.

Congress has the power to do this, as they have the power to authorize lower courts. Only the SC itself is enshrined in the Constitution.
Ignorant and wrong.

The Supreme Court is an appellate court, the last in the Federal system.
 
One man in particular who was mistakenly deported

He was an illegal alien, right?
He was deported, right?
What's the problem?

The entirety of the Supreme Court stated what was wrong.
 
One man in particular who was mistakenly deported

He was an illegal alien, right?
He was deported, right?
What's the problem?
Right. And that moron is acting like all 270 of those deported were in the same boat anyway. ONE admitted mistake translates to about 1/3 of 1% of the total. That is a ratio that I can live with.
 
Ignorant and wrong.

The Supreme Court is an appellate court, the last in the Federal system.
Article III, Section 2, Clause 2:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
 
Right. And that moron is acting like all 270 of those deported were in the same boat anyway. ONE admitted mistake translates to about 1/3 of 1% of the total. That is a ratio that I can live with.

To me, IMHO, it's not that a mistake was made.

It's the refusal to correct the mistake that is problematic.

If the administration had owned up to the mistake, had El Salvador return the contract detainee we are paying for and returned him to Texas for further action?

This would not be the stinking pile of bullshyte it currently is.

WW
 
They did when they publicly admitted that a mistake was made. This is nothing but more overblown, democrat BS to distract from the fact that Biden promoted and aided this illegal invasion in the first place.

Ummm ...

They did, in court.

Then the DOJ fired*** Erez Reuveni, Acting Deputy Director for the Office of Immigration Litigation, they had just promoted to the position and who was in court saying what a great lawyer he was.

WW
.
.
.
*** Techncially he was removed from the case and placed on administrative leave. But given the Trump admin, he'll get fired for doing his job in court.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom