Rules For Traditionals: How People In Wedding Trades Can Defend Themselves

BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
You might think it makes him an asshole, but the law, courts, and constitution are on his side, not yours.

The courts are on his side. That's all. They're a gang of hand picked political stooges. The courts are just the way libturds get around the Constitution, the law, and the popular will.

Those damn liberals stacked the Roberts Court

:eek:

:cuckoo:
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
You might think it makes him an asshole, but the law, courts, and constitution are on his side, not yours.

The courts are on his side. That's all. They're a gang of hand picked political stooges. The courts are just the way libturds get around the Constitution, the law, and the popular will.

Those damn liberals stacked the Roberts Court

:eek:

:cuckoo:

Yes, including George Bush. Roberts is the guy who said Obamacare is a tax, if you don't recall.
 
We also don't have rule by judges.
We sure as hell fucking do. That's how we resolve things in this country you fucking dumbass.

LOL! No... that's how we "SOLVED" things... past tense. Ya see scamp, that was back when the court was OBJECTIVE... prior to the infection of RELATIVISM; which is to say, evil.

Now Relativism is the doctrine which holds that knowledge, truth, and morality exist only in relation to one's cultural, societal, historical and personal context, and, as such can never be the result of soundly reasoned absolutes.

It is through this, perversion of reason, wherein relativism axiomatically rejects the objectivity that is essential to truth.


And with truth being essential to trust and, both of those being critical to the establishment of a soundly reasoned morality, and because a soundly reasoned morality is essential to Justice... it becomes clear to reasonable people, that Relativism can never serve justice.

Therefore, because Relativism cannot serve justice, the judiciary which was designed for the service of such, becomes IRRELEVANT... and Justice is served on a more LOCAL level, one on one and man to feminized male.

At some point of course, the DOWNSIDE (consequences) to Relativism becomes apparent even to the Relativists... but sadly, as is so often the case, wherein those who once had something, turned from what they had and lost it... that they weep and gnash their tooth, begging that it should be returned to them... but they have destroyed it, and it remains no more. And the comfort and safety that it provided them, was destroyed with it.

But, hey... In fairness to you, Relativism being what it is and all... There's no way you can now that truth.

 
Last edited:
Do you see Friends how the Demon works?

He points to the system of justice, and claims it infallible even as it turns from justice, declaring then that injustice is equal to justice.

It is a lie... .

Just as it is a lie that sexual gratification is a goal unto itself and that such can reasonably and justly be achieved by any means and that there is a right to murder one's own pre-born child and that the property of another is not theirs, because you have a need of it.

There is no potential for good in the Ideological Left... its purpose is purely and entirely, that of destruction.
 
They picked thier job, dumbass.

Again, you don't get to decide what the responsibilities of their jobs are, dumbass.
Yes, we do. Capitalism is regulated. Time to grow up now pee boy.

Yes, we have become a fascist country due to the likes of you.
then leave. Seriously leave and shut the fuck up already. Put up or shut up.

You leave, asshole. You and your ilk are constantly whining about how this country works, and then whenever anyone objects to your schemes to remake society you tell them to get the hell out. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
well no, what i object to is you attempting to spread your stupid to other people in ear shot. im telling you to leave because i dont like you. You are too stupid for america. Plenty of people disagree with my opinions and i dont tell them to leave. You on the other hand are one of those special brand of stupids that you come across every so often.

kinda like the OP, someone that is so fundamentally stupid that she actually has to think to make sure she is breathing.You are a troll, and thus will be treated like one.
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
States have always had the power to tell business what they can and cannot do. :rofl:

Same sex marriage is largely the work of unelected federal judges, not state legislatures.
see, you are too stupid to understand how our government works.
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
States have always had the power to tell business what they can and cannot do. :rofl:

Same sex marriage is largely the work of unelected federal judges, not state legislatures.
see, you are too stupid to understand how our government works.

He actually has it correct.

In that in the vast majority of the States, were elected the vast majority of the Legislators, who publicly debated and passed bills which defended the natural standards of Marriage. Which were then signed into law by the Majority of the Governors.

Laws which were 'over-turned' by a half dozen individuals on the Federal Judiciary, who came to their decisions on specious grounds.

Now, those are the facts, contest them if you like, but you will not enjoy the process.
 
The courts were never asked to define marriage. The court rulings through the years have referred to the right to marry. Historically, marriage has only been between a man and a woman, but same sex couples have been marriage within religious institutions for as far back as the 1970s and probably further.

Civil marriages are recent.
civil marriages are the ones the courts have ruled on -- all civil marriages have been between two person withiyes of the law.
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
You might think it makes him an asshole, but the law, courts, and constitution are on his side, not yours.

The courts are on his side. That's all. They're a gang of hand picked political stooges. The courts are just the way libturds get around the Constitution, the law, and the popular will.

Those damn liberals stacked the Roberts Court

:eek:

:cuckoo:

Yes, including George Bush. Roberts is the guy who said Obamacare is a tax, if you don't recall.

No one said Obamacare was a tax.

Chief Justice Roberts said in the Court's decision that the shared responsibility payment within the mandate in the PPACA was a penalty that for constitutional purposes functions as a tax. The law was NOT reworded to say the payment is a tax.

gawd, you're dumb as dirt
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
You might think it makes him an asshole, but the law, courts, and constitution are on his side, not yours.

The courts are on his side. That's all. They're a gang of hand picked political stooges. The courts are just the way libturds get around the Constitution, the law, and the popular will.

Those damn liberals stacked the Roberts Court

:eek:

:cuckoo:

Yes, including George Bush. Roberts is the guy who said Obamacare is a tax, if you don't recall.
Chief Justice Roberts said in the Court's decision that the shared responsibility payment within the mandate in the PPACA was a penalty that for constitutional purposes functions as a tax. The law was NOT reworded to say the payment is a tax.
 
The religious and the gay mafia are enemy camps. As soon as the religious people recognize that they are dealing with enemies determined that only the mafia survive the sooner they will start dealing realistically with the problem.
 
Our whole economy depends on peddling gluteus sugary confections to straight people. I don't care anymore, cakes for weasel groomers. Cakes for left handed albino card counters. they make money making cakes, what is the problem?
 
Our whole economy depends on peddling gluteus sugary confections to straight people. I don't care anymore, cakes for weasel groomers. Cakes for left handed albino card counters. they make money making cakes, what is the problem?

I think we should all have a right on what we (as bakers) want to write on one

How about someone request: Obama is a Muslim and a faggot loser. would you put that for someone?

It's OUR BUSINESS paid with our blood, sweat and tears. I'm not REQUIRED to serve anyone if I didn't want to
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
Isn't that what the communist right is doing?
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
Isn't that what the communist right is doing?

and they call themselves "liberal" here's a good one. they call themselves "progressive" ooooooooooooooooooo
deep down they are red boned Fascist/commies
 
Our whole economy depends on peddling gluteus sugary confections to straight people. I don't care anymore, cakes for weasel groomers. Cakes for left handed albino card counters. they make money making cakes, what is the problem?

I think we should all have a right on what we (as bakers) want to write on one

How about someone request: Obama is a Muslim and a faggot loser. would you put that for someone?

It's OUR BUSINESS paid with our blood, sweat and tears. I'm not REQUIRED to serve anyone if I didn't want to
I have every respect for your craft , that post was tongue in cheek. But really, playing the devil's advocate here, what's wrong with selling a really expensive cake to a gay couple? You are going to profit, and that is the bottom line, isn't it?
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
Isn't that what the communist right is doing?

and they call themselves "liberal" here's a good one. they call themselves "progressive" ooooooooooooooooooo
deep down they are red boned Fascist/commies
just like the Right; a bunch of communists and don't even know it.
 
Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
You might think it makes him an asshole, but the law, courts, and constitution are on his side, not yours.

The courts are on his side. That's all. They're a gang of hand picked political stooges. The courts are just the way libturds get around the Constitution, the law, and the popular will.

Those damn liberals stacked the Roberts Court

:eek:

:cuckoo:

Yes, including George Bush. Roberts is the guy who said Obamacare is a tax, if you don't recall.
Chief Justice Roberts said in the Court's decision that the shared responsibility payment within the mandate in the PPACA was a penalty that for constitutional purposes functions as a tax. The law was NOT reworded to say the payment is a tax.

Yes, we know what he said. He changed the meaning of the word "tax" to mean "penalty."
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“In other words, bend over and take it up the ass. That's the kind of freedom loving attitude we've come to expect from the likes of you.”

No.

Conduct yourself like a professional business owner and serve your patrons accordingly, by following necessary and proper regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause.

This is a non-issue, a ridiculous 'controversy' the consequence of the social right and their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution and its case law.

Here's another asshole who believes he's entitled to tell business owners how to run their businesses. That's the lib/fascist mentality in a nutshell: telling other people how to run their lives/businesses.
Isn't that what the communist right is doing?

The "communist right?" Did you intend to post this oxymoron?
 
Our whole economy depends on peddling gluteus sugary confections to straight people. I don't care anymore, cakes for weasel groomers. Cakes for left handed albino card counters. they make money making cakes, what is the problem?

I think we should all have a right on what we (as bakers) want to write on one

How about someone request: Obama is a Muslim and a faggot loser. would you put that for someone?

It's OUR BUSINESS paid with our blood, sweat and tears. I'm not REQUIRED to serve anyone if I didn't want to
I have every respect for your craft , that post was tongue in cheek. But really, playing the devil's advocate here, what's wrong with selling a really expensive cake to a gay couple? You are going to profit, and that is the bottom line, isn't it?

It wasn't the selling to homosexuals. I believe it had more to do with what they wanted written on it and another one was to Cater a wedding. Like they did to the poor pizza joint. they told them they didn't Cater to anything, but they went and filed a complaint against them...this is getting out of hand and they are trying to FORCE a business to do something they find distasteful. They have A RIGHT to refuse and homosexual or not. People can find another business. We do it every single day if one store is out of the product you want, you go to another one. or wait until for gawd knows how long for them to get it in stock.
Small business people better start standing up to this.
 
OK, lets step back here. If you own a business, any business, say, regrinding brakes or making cell phones, theoretically: can you afford to exclude some class of people you don't agree with? Is that even an option?
 

Forum List

Back
Top