It's a policy............policy can be changed on a whim.Because you can't indict a sitting president. We've been over this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a policy............policy can be changed on a whim.Because you can't indict a sitting president. We've been over this.
I freely admit Clinton did bad shit. What he didn't do was break any serious laws in the process. (Sorry, perjury in a bullshit lawsuit in a non-germaine issue isn't a big deal.)
Clinton hasn't been president in 24 years. He's not coming back any time soon, so I don't worry about him that much.
I do worry that Trump wants to get back into power and is threatening "revenge" against all his "enemies".
Actually, it's more than a policy. It's more a practicality.It's a policy............policy can be changed on a whim.
Can you cite the law that makes an NDA illegal? Hint, it's not illegal, and that's not why TRUMP! is on trial.It has to be. Because what he did with her is illegal.
PS. Think about the sentence you just typed. Boy how far have you sunk?
First of all we don't know that to be true. Stormy Daniels is not a very credible witness. Those other people had real jobs and weren't pornstarsOh, please, we've sent people to prison for "accounting errors" that are far less.
You are thinking of Gary Hart. But you raise an interesting point. Hart, Clinton, Edwards were all held to account for sticking their dicks in places they didn't belong.
So should Trump.
Trump is perfectly free to get on the witness stand and tell the jury his side of the story.First of all we don't know that to be true. Stormy Daniels is not a very credible witness. Those other people had real jobs and weren't pornstars
Did those other people sign an affidavit denying the affair to then renig on it?
Did those other people testify to salacious details that weren't even relevant to the case?
She's just a Ho in search of money.
Even Avenetti, the love of the left opposes her now. LOL, how ironic that a low life like that is now turning on an even bigger low life.
Can you cite the law that makes an NDA illegal? Hint, it's not illegal, and that's not why TRUMP! is on trial.
Why should he. They haven't proven anything from what I can see. This is about embarrassing him (Which the details are not from reliable witnesses) and hamstringing his campaign (with gag orders). It's bullshit, like it has always been. Maybe Alvin Bragg should be putting people that chop up another human being in jail and not worry if Trump made hush money payments to a porn star.Trump is perfectly free to get on the witness stand and tell the jury his side of the story.
I don't think he will, though.
If the details are salacious, you guys should vote for a guy who engages in that kind of behavior. Say what you want about Slick Willie, and I've said plenty, but that guy was at least discreet.
"Wow, that porn star I fucked turned out to be sleazy!" isn't much of an endorsement.
You're guilty of prostitution but I dont think Stormy was paid for the sex, (at least she's never said she was) just paid for her silence about the sexSo if I pay a hooker to raw dog her for 3 minutes with my mushroom penis and I have her sign a NDA, I've broken no laws?
The salacious details weren't germane to the case. Hell, whether or not they actually had sex has zero relevance to this case certainly the circumstances of it aren't.Trump is perfectly free to get on the witness stand and tell the jury his side of the story.
I don't think he will, though.
If the details are salacious, you guys should vote for a guy who engages in that kind of behavior. Say what you want about Slick Willie, and I've said plenty, but that guy was at least discreet.
"Wow, that porn star I fucked turned out to be sleazy!" isn't much of an endorsement.
No, the NDA is perfectly legal. Prostitution is not. The last I checked, TRUMP! wasn't charged with soliciting a prostitute. What's at question is where the hush money came from. If he used only private funds, no problem. If he used campaign funds, problem, the size of which has been ludicrously inflated.So if I pay a hooker to raw dog her for 3 minutes with my mushroom penis and I have her sign a NDA, I've broken no laws?
Why should he. They haven't proven anything from what I can see. This is about embarrassing him (Which the details are not from reliable witnesses) and hamstringing his campaign (with gag orders). It's bullshit, like it has always been. Maybe Alvin Bragg should be putting people that chop up another human being in jail and not worry if Trump made hush money payments to a porn star.
That's not entirely true. If the prosecution can PROVE that Trump only paid Daniels to keep quiet as part of his candidacy then the fact that he used his own funds would actually prove the DA's case. I'd be willing to bet if Trump had used campaign funds for this the DA would be making the case that he illegally used campaign funds to pay off his mistress so his wife wouldn't find out. IMO proving either case would be wildly difficult unless Trump told someone explicitly why he was making the payment.No, the NDA is perfectly legal. Prostitution is not. The last I checked, TRUMP! wasn't charged with soliciting a prostitute. What's at question is where the hush money came from. If he used only private funds, no problem. If he used campaign funds, problem, the size of which has been ludicrously inflated.
LOL that's complete bull shit.If Trump had come clean about Daniels in 2016, he wouldn't have won. So we were all cheated.
That's kind of a big deal.
But you do go on with your denial.
LOL that's complete bull shit.
Do you really think anyone cares that Trump fucked a Porn star? He was on tape talking about grabbing women by the pussy. Trump won because Hilary was a terrible candidate.
Actually, Hillary got the most votes... but that's a different discussion.
If people knew about the porn star, that would have shifted about 80K votes in the Swing states. That's why he paid to cover it up.
Here's a tip. That isnt how we elect Presidents. Something you and Hilary cant seem to wrap your collective heads around. Probably one of the reasons she lost.
Oh, I don't know, was it suppressed? Everyone heard about it. Most people doubted it because it was just too silly on face value.Ok the Hunter laptop story being covered up by the media shifted ummmmm lets see...... 125K votes in swing states and proves that the 2020 election was stolen... Am I right?