Roy Moore says he'll sue WaPo

[The Derp]

So what you are asking is that he testify under oath that he went on dates with willing women above the legal age of consent of 16 years of age. That's not a crime, bub.

So it's not a lie that as a man in his thirties, he pursued high school girls. So what's the lie?

 

[Valerie]

Liberals get all hot over accusations with never any proof don't they? Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

 

[Pogo]

He should.

------------------ For?

 

[The Derp]

Why do Men in there thirties pursue Men in there thirties? Curious people want to know.

So OK, you're at least now admitting the accusation that Moore pursued high school girls isn't a lie. So what's the lie, then?

 

[bodecea]

Testimony by the victims

There has been no testimony, just allegations in the press with no actual proof.

McConnell Says He Believes Women Accusing Moore
November 13, 2017 at 11:47 am ESTBy Taegan Goddard185 Comments


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said that Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore (R) should leave the race, Politico reports.

Said McConnell: “I think he should step aside. I believe the women, yes.”

That's funny. I bet you hate McConnell and don't believe him on other subjects.

We Democrats are having fun indeed watching you all destroy yourselves.

Popcorn just doesn't work any longer. We have eaten waaay too much already.

Is Popcorn the name of the squirrel in the Oak tree behind your trailer?

Again.....why are you forgetting the topic of this thread and talking only about the poster, MarkDuffy? Surely you are confident enough to stand with the relevant topic material alone........?

 

[MarkDuffy]

Many of our Grandparents did the same. That's historical fact.

Were they criminals?

Excusing it like some others in Alabama are, eh?

I know a vet, seriously wounded at Normandy, though in a wheelchair would kick your silly little ass for calling him a pervert.

He undressed himself in front of a 15 year old when he was 32? Then he would be a pervert....regardless.

Proof? He denies that this happened. So, unless there is actual evidence, sounds like a political hit job to me.

Then we are all in agreement that he should sue, right?

If Moore does not sue, he will be additionally a liar and a coward besides admitting guilt of sexual assault of a minor.

 

[Pogo]

What would the WP be claiming if a DEM negro man was running and had been accused?
100% guaranteed the WP would be screaming 'INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!
Hearsay means nothing in a court of law.
The ***** has been purchased by the WAPO. She's accused three priests over the years of sexual assaulting her.
Those bullshit lies nearly ended her up in prison.
She'll roll on the ***** at the WAPO who bought the lies against Moore.

The post printed a story

It can be viewed as accurate or not

Zackly. Some wags continue to fail at reading comprehension --- the story is not "Roy Moore groped a 14-year-old". The story is that a woman says she was groped by him at age 14. Which is true, she does say that. And of that there is no dispute.

Not rocket surgery, end of discussion.

 

[martybegan]

Dunno, ask most people in Hollywood.

"Most people in Hollywood" diddle 14-17 year old high school kids?

I must have missed that story

Or date people ridiculously younger than them, which is really all the Moore thing has proved out so far.

And have you heard of Roman Polanski?

 

[bodecea]

At worst it would be the MF version of pederasty, not pedophilia.

And that's better? You're making a partisan bargain with a creeper of high school girls. So much for morality!

The other 3 stories involved 17-18 year olds, which can consent in Alabama and other states.

Why was a man in his thirties pursuing high school girls?

So you're not denying the accusation that he pursued high school girls, you're denying the accusation he did anything sexual with them?

Why do Men in there thirties pursue Men in there thirties? Curious people want to know.

I don't believe that is the topic of this thread either. Why can't you stay on the topic of Roy Moore saying he's gonna sue the WaPost? I'm curious why all the off-topic tangents.

 

[The Derp]

Or date people ridiculously younger than them, which is really all the Moore thing has proved out so far.

Trouble is that Moore is running on a platform of righteous Christian family values...there's not much righteous family values there when you are a 30 year old pursuing high school girls.

And have you heard of Roman Polanski?

Yeah, he lives abroad because if he comes back to the states, he will face charges for anally raping a girl not that much younger than the ones Moore pursued.

Why was Moore even pursuing high school girls in the first place?

 

[martybegan]

At worst it would be the MF version of pederasty, not pedophilia.

And that's better? You're making a partisan bargain with a creeper of high school girls. So much for morality!

The other 3 stories involved 17-18 year olds, which can consent in Alabama and other states.

So you're not denying the accusation that he pursued high school girls, you're denying the accusation he did anything sexual with them? Well, why was a man in his thirties pursuing high school girls?

I'm using the appropriate word for the situation. Words mean things.

So far the other 3 just said it involved dating or a little making out. Again, considering we have a story about Charlie Sheen cornholing Corey Haim and the proven stuff about Polanski, the lefts concern over this issue is comical.

In hollywood men in their 60's gun for the late teens/early 20's crowd. again, your call for morality is comical.

And in the end Roy Boy married the last one in the series, his current wife.

 

[bodecea]

Dunno, ask most people in Hollywood.

"Most people in Hollywood" diddle 14-17 year old high school kids?

I must have missed that story

Or date people ridiculously younger than them, which is really all the Moore thing has proved out so far.

And have you heard of Roman Polanski?

Yes......and he ran away from the U.S. to avoid prosecution. Moore isn't running away from prosecution....he is running for the Senate. Funny how the reaction to him is so very different.

(BTW...Polanski, imo, is guilty as hell)

 

[MarkDuffy]

Dunno, ask most people in Hollywood.

"Most people in Hollywood" diddle 14-17 year old high school kids?

I must have missed that story

Or date people ridiculously younger than them, which is really all the Moore thing has proved out so far.

And have you heard of Roman Polanski?

Roman Polanski is not running for the Senate when his own party hates his depravity

 

[bodecea]

At worst it would be the MF version of pederasty, not pedophilia.

And that's better? You're making a partisan bargain with a creeper of high school girls. So much for morality!

The other 3 stories involved 17-18 year olds, which can consent in Alabama and other states.

So you're not denying the accusation that he pursued high school girls, you're denying the accusation he did anything sexual with them? Well, why was a man in his thirties pursuing high school girls?

I'm using the appropriate word for the situation. Words mean things.

So far the other 3 just said it involved dating or a little making out. Again, considering we have a story about Charlie Sheen cornholing Corey Haim and the proven stuff about Polanski, the lefts concern over this issue is comical.

In hollywood men in their 60's gun for the late teens/early 20's crowd. again, your call for morality is comical.

And in the end Roy Boy married the last one in the series, his current wife.

Charlie Sheen should be prosecuted to find out if the accusations are true........NOT elected to the Senate.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Yeah sure, like his fellow perv The Angry Creamsicle in the White House - Creepy Roy is full of hot air.



Roy Moore threatens to sue Washington Post over report - CNNPolitics

No, Roy Moore Isn't Going to Sue Anyone
Just to state it explicitly, there is absolutely no way Roy Moore is going to sue the Washington Post over their reporting on his dating teenagers when he was in his early thirties. This is likely obvious to most. But I wanted to make it clear in case there’s any question. As a public figure, the standard Moore would have to meet to sustain a suit is all be impossible. Particularly, as a candidate in a major election, his behavior is inherently newsworthy and closest to the more civically important forms of speech. Even if you assume for the sake of conversation that all the accusers are lying, that wouldn’t be enough for Moore to win a suit. Since he is a public figure he would have to show actual malice in the Post’s reporting. That essentially means that the Post knew the allegations were false or had a reckless disregard for the truth, simply didn’t care. The depth of the sourcing which is visible in the story makes that all but impossible. Moore knows all this. This is just a way to signal to low information voters or ones desperate to believe him that he’s fighting the charges rather than admitting their truth. He’s not suing anyone.

 

[martybegan]

Or date people ridiculously younger than them, which is really all the Moore thing has proved out so far.

Trouble is that Moore is running on a platform of righteous Christian family values...there's not much righteous family values there when you are a 30 year old pursuing high school girls.

And have you heard of Roman Polanski?

Yeah, he lives abroad because if he comes back to the states, he will face charges for anally raping a girl not that much younger than the ones Moore pursued.

Why was Moore even pursuing high school girls in the first place?

Have you even read the bible? Age difference is found throughout the damn thing.

He married the last one he went after, although she was 24 when they got hitched. Still 14 years younger than him.

The point about Polanski is that lefties bend over backwards to support his dumb ass, but since they already hated Moore is A-ok to just assume he's guilty.

 

[DrLove]

Excusing it like some others in Alabama are, eh?

Entirely too much inbreeding has taken place in that state.

 

[miketx]

Liberals get all hot over accusations with never any proof don't they? Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

But but but... I usually don't mention Benghazi because I don't have any direct knowledge of it. Unlike liberal scum, I believe in innocent until proven guilty.

 

[martybegan]

At worst it would be the MF version of pederasty, not pedophilia.

And that's better? You're making a partisan bargain with a creeper of high school girls. So much for morality!

The other 3 stories involved 17-18 year olds, which can consent in Alabama and other states.

So you're not denying the accusation that he pursued high school girls, you're denying the accusation he did anything sexual with them? Well, why was a man in his thirties pursuing high school girls?

I'm using the appropriate word for the situation. Words mean things.

So far the other 3 just said it involved dating or a little making out. Again, considering we have a story about Charlie Sheen cornholing Corey Haim and the proven stuff about Polanski, the lefts concern over this issue is comical.

In hollywood men in their 60's gun for the late teens/early 20's crowd. again, your call for morality is comical.

And in the end Roy Boy married the last one in the series, his current wife.

Charlie Sheen should be prosecuted to find out if the accusations are true........NOT elected to the Senate.

Which just goes to show you how much of a political operation this is. If he does lose the story will die off, having served it's purpose.

Any retraction will be on page 57, right next to the obituaries.

 

[MarkDuffy]

Why do Men in there thirties pursue Men in there thirties? Curious people want to know.

So OK, you're at least now admitting the accusation that Moore pursued high school girls isn't a lie. So what's the lie, then?

Moore already admitted on Hannity that he pursued high school girls while in his 30s