SO far I haven't seen a clue as to where Trump got the information that Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. Knowing that Trump is a pathological liar, I wasn't about to take his word on anything.. I searched for any clue that any one of the 17 US intelligence agencies was involved with the report Trump received. The result? NADA. I listened to all the media coverage and not one asked who provided the Intel Trump used to make his strike. TO me, that omission was very suspicious but all I could do was continue to search for some validation of those suspicions. Shortly thereafter I found this:
Thanks for the video. It shows clearly why no one took Ron Paul seriously when he ran for president.
On the contrary, I think Paul was one of the more viable candidates on the right.The video shows that he is a thinking man who skipped the kool-aid.
As a candidate he was a side show; perhaps you don't know what the word, viable, means. The video shows he is neither a thinking man nor an honest man. He makes bizarre claims such as "peace was at hand" or "everything was going so well" or claims there is some doubt about whether Assad did it. All of these are false claims he uses to provide some basis for his rants about warmongers and perpetual war. He is simply an isolationist by disposition making up stories to try to persuade others to follow him.
The Russian bombing has shifted the momentum of the war, but there are no indications the rebels or their supporters are about to be wiped out or will give up, so his claim that peace was at hand is a flat out lie. In fact, if Russia ever stops bombing, the momentum will shift again and Assad will be in danger of being overrun. His claim that everything was going so well is not only bizarre but sickening. The bombing by Assad and Russia has killed 200,000 civilians and created millions of homeless refugees and since Assad cannot be kept in power if the bombing ever stops, "everything going so well" means hundreds of thousands more dead civilians and millions more homeless refugees. What kind of a sick mind thinks these things are indications things are going well?
Before the attack, the US shared its evidence that Assad did it with all of its top allies in NATO and others like Australia, Japan and Israel, and not one of them expressed any doubt that Assad was guilty and all of them supported the US strike. So when Paul says there is doubt about Assad's guilt, he is suggesting the whole world is made up of warmongers who want perpetual war and only Assad, Iran, Russia and Ron Paul and his followers are the exceptions.
The guy sounds a lot more like a cult leader than a political leader.
